Okay, so you are just willfully missing the point then. It matters because naturally acquired immunity In unvaccinated is better than vaccine induced immunity.
Okay, so you are just willfully missing the point then. It matters because naturally acquired immunity In unvaccinated is better than vaccine induced immunity.
"Of note is that these analyses do not aim to determine the probability of getting infected after vaccination or previous infection, but rather calculate the likelihood of getting infected with specific VOCs."
Okay, so you are just willfully missing the point then. It matters because naturally acquired immunity In unvaccinated is better than vaccine induced immunity.
That was not indicated by this study but if you have data to prove that please submit it.
That’s literally what the quote from the abstract said that I have directed you to twice. Maybe you should read more carefully.
No, it literally was not.
1) if you're vaccinated and you get covid the likelihood that it is a variant is X (and X > 50%).
2) if you're unvaccinated and recovered-sick and get covid it's an equal chance to be a variant and alpha.
That says nothing about the odds of either group catching covid in relation to reach other.
Here's a quote you obviously missed:
"Of note is that these analyses do not aim to determine the probability of getting infected after vaccination or previous infection, but rather calculate the likelihood of getting infected with specific VOCs."
The context is that studies which have looked at probability of reinfection have shown much greater durability in naturally acquired immunity.
But that has nothing to do with this study or it's results and you can't infer anything of that sort from this study like the OP is claiming.