"Of note is that these analyses do not aim to determine the probability of getting infected after vaccination or previous infection, but rather calculate the likelihood of getting infected with specific VOCs."
"Of note is that these analyses do not aim to determine the probability of getting infected after vaccination or previous infection, but rather calculate the likelihood of getting infected with specific VOCs."
Here's a quote you obviously missed:
"Of note is that these analyses do not aim to determine the probability of getting infected after vaccination or previous infection, but rather calculate the likelihood of getting infected with specific VOCs."
The context is that studies which have looked at probability of reinfection have shown much greater durability in naturally acquired immunity.
But that has nothing to do with this study or it's results and you can't infer anything of that sort from this study like the OP is claiming.