5 Comments
User's avatar
Stacey Skold's avatar

Exactly. Thank you for your perseverance. It is having an impact!

Liz Lipman-Stern's avatar

You have given the wrong organization credit for a list of protocols. As you wrote <<America’s Frontline Doctors also have protocols - well-reasoned, back by observation, real-world data, clinical studies and meta-analyses - that all physicians should read. These are the IMASK+, MATH+, and I-RECOVER protocols, along with a Complete Guide to the Care of the COVID-19 Patient.>>

It is FLCCC that has produced those protocols, not America’s Frontline Doctors. Two very different organizations. Please correct this.

Liz Lipman-Stern's avatar

I didn’t mean to simply comment on the need for that correction. I deeply appreciate your continued effort to help steer us toward rationality.

Tim Mackey MD MS's avatar

I read all of Kory’s, McCullough’s and Marik’s observations, and opinions, watched Dr Kory’s testimony before Senator Johnson’s subcommittee. As a pediatrician and monitoring who was most at risk I knew most of my patients were most likely going to weather this ok. They did. I fortunately had a close friend who was an independent pharmacist who for some reason had an excess supply of Ivermectin. I bought what he had and sent adequate doses to my son’s in law’s here in CA and the same to my 7 siblings and spouses in Utah and Texas (everyone considerably north of 57 years) with the FLCCC protocols. At least 4 of this group got quite sick but recovered completely with no obvious complications. The vilification of those trying off label medication with various protocols, to this day I cannot wrap my head around. Especially when the risk ie. Ivermectin was so low. It truly saddens me that the decision makers for the US’s approach to this pandemic will never be held accountable.