How do you think Scientific American's jumping into politics of choosing one candidate helps? In my opinion it makes anything they publish suspect as having a bias. I guess they do and just proved it. As a neophyte isn't science just an observation of a set of conditions to discover the yet unknown? Otherwise a great article that tries t…
How do you think Scientific American's jumping into politics of choosing one candidate helps? In my opinion it makes anything they publish suspect as having a bias. I guess they do and just proved it. As a neophyte isn't science just an observation of a set of conditions to discover the yet unknown? Otherwise a great article that tries to expand beyond the biomedical field. Full disclosure, I was involved in a research project many years ago that failed for many of the reasons you address in your extensively written tome.
How do you think Scientific American's jumping into politics of choosing one candidate helps? In my opinion it makes anything they publish suspect as having a bias. I guess they do and just proved it. As a neophyte isn't science just an observation of a set of conditions to discover the yet unknown? Otherwise a great article that tries to expand beyond the biomedical field. Full disclosure, I was involved in a research project many years ago that failed for many of the reasons you address in your extensively written tome.
I wrote (phrowt1) this and it seems to have been published under "Later than you think". What's up with that? It seems Unpopular Rationalism..