That's exactly what I was thinking. This article (and I'm sure there will be many more like) creates "plausible deniability" for the Big Pharma vaccine manufacturers.
I think it goes further than just one industry. Consider a global Oligarchy that is unable to adapt to the realization that the immunological models of reality that they have invested a large fortune in, suck. Cultivated deference to the "experts" has down regulated our collective fraud/B.S. sensors, so severely that it takes mass casualty events for the signal to make it through. For whatever reason, they have decided to double down hard (on us) with unlimited short term funding for PR/Narrative control.
"Vaccinologists Do Not Entirely Understand What Vaccines Are Doing:" Does anything after that matter? Is that not enough to cease and desist, investigate, charge and punish?
Vaccinologists don't want to learn about vaccines; they are making too much money with big pharma to even care! Follow the money, and that will lead you to the science!
The question that springs to my mind is: Why are whole-cell pertussis vaccines being introduced to low- and mid-income countries when they have been replaced by acellular pertussis vaccines in higher-income countries due to the risk of “infantile spasms,” or seizures?
I might be stating the obvious here, but it seems like the safety measure for a vaccine, any vaccine, should be judged against all cause mortality and not simply against death by the targeted pathogen. Not to be stupid in making a point, but getting a shot from a Glock 19 gen 5 is definitely an effective vaccine against covid and all other viruses 😂
The liability shield was predicated on biannual testing of synergistic effects of each jab added to multi jab visits , as well as the cumulative effects .
Never happened.
How is it again , that they are shielded ?
Seems a pretty simple case of breaking a contract , right ?
I wonder about methodology too … the mRNA covid shots were associated with OVERALL increase in life expectancy due to elimination of certain data. Common sense tells me that injecting vials of garbage (live garbage or dead garbage) cannot possibly improve upon nature. The result should prompt incredulousness
Reading ‘Establishment’ scientific papers on vaccines, vaccinology, or immunology, I am continually struck by the overwhelming bulldozer tsunami of self certainty that is being offered, justified by the ‘detail’ in the paper.
It seems Vaccinology is a religion where the fundamental tenets are accepted as gospel (settled science), and will never be questioned until they get it so wrong in their hasty enthusiasm to tamper with Nature that there is an undeniable human health catastrophe.
However, I do worry that the growing control of the WHO by commercial interests will amplify the lack interest in the negative effects of vaccines as demonstrated in the article in relation to non live virus vaccines, especially the new generation of mRNA products.
This begs the question in which I would love to see a deep conversation about: what vaccine could ever eradicate a disease?...... if that has ever REALLY been done as touted by many pro and not pro vaccine ppl. smallpox, polio. neither are eradicated. It is often parroted and when I hear it, my body intrinsically contracts and rejects this idea. Humans think they can outwit viruses and the microbiome of the earth. Gaia is smarter than that and the ideology is equal to, biting the hand that feeds you. Will humans ever learn?
Is it a "flawed methodology" or is it cover for a criminal enterprise?
Criminal enterprise 💰
That's exactly what I was thinking. This article (and I'm sure there will be many more like) creates "plausible deniability" for the Big Pharma vaccine manufacturers.
I think it goes further than just one industry. Consider a global Oligarchy that is unable to adapt to the realization that the immunological models of reality that they have invested a large fortune in, suck. Cultivated deference to the "experts" has down regulated our collective fraud/B.S. sensors, so severely that it takes mass casualty events for the signal to make it through. For whatever reason, they have decided to double down hard (on us) with unlimited short term funding for PR/Narrative control.
I really like the vaccinologist Geert Van Den Bossche, is he overlooking vaccine downsides I wonder?
"Vaccinologists Do Not Entirely Understand What Vaccines Are Doing:" Does anything after that matter? Is that not enough to cease and desist, investigate, charge and punish?
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that PLAEs were the intended "effect".
Vaccinologists don't want to learn about vaccines; they are making too much money with big pharma to even care! Follow the money, and that will lead you to the science!
The question that springs to my mind is: Why are whole-cell pertussis vaccines being introduced to low- and mid-income countries when they have been replaced by acellular pertussis vaccines in higher-income countries due to the risk of “infantile spasms,” or seizures?
They're much cheaper and, if the child survives the vaccine, they do a somewhat better job at preventing pertussis.
I might be stating the obvious here, but it seems like the safety measure for a vaccine, any vaccine, should be judged against all cause mortality and not simply against death by the targeted pathogen. Not to be stupid in making a point, but getting a shot from a Glock 19 gen 5 is definitely an effective vaccine against covid and all other viruses 😂
Could there be differences in adjuvants that might explain (some) of the difference between live/non live vaccinations?
Do live vaccines use adjuvants?
No
Thanks. Didn't think so
The same scrutiny needs to be applied to so-called "virology." Germ theory is still a theory.
I think terrain theory is much more plausible if one suffers from disease or not.
Terrain important, but regardless Lister's approach has saved so many women's lives and continues to do so.
Jack
But please note when I asked Benn about neurological complications of vaccines (autism etc) she confessed they’d never studied it.
https://www.ageofautism.com/2020/07/no-data-for-neurological-impairment.html
The liability shield was predicated on biannual testing of synergistic effects of each jab added to multi jab visits , as well as the cumulative effects .
Never happened.
How is it again , that they are shielded ?
Seems a pretty simple case of breaking a contract , right ?
Gosh they just love using African populations as guinea pigs
I wonder about methodology too … the mRNA covid shots were associated with OVERALL increase in life expectancy due to elimination of certain data. Common sense tells me that injecting vials of garbage (live garbage or dead garbage) cannot possibly improve upon nature. The result should prompt incredulousness
get us sick and dependent on more big pharma drugs - that's the point of "vaccines"
any coincidence Pfizer just acquired a biotech for $40 billion plus focused on cancer research?
---> https://eccentrik.substack.com/p/as-cancer-rates-explode-big-pharma?r=8ypo0&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Perhaps the money used for dodgyvaccines would be better spent on nutrition and sanitation
Reading ‘Establishment’ scientific papers on vaccines, vaccinology, or immunology, I am continually struck by the overwhelming bulldozer tsunami of self certainty that is being offered, justified by the ‘detail’ in the paper.
It seems Vaccinology is a religion where the fundamental tenets are accepted as gospel (settled science), and will never be questioned until they get it so wrong in their hasty enthusiasm to tamper with Nature that there is an undeniable human health catastrophe.
However, I do worry that the growing control of the WHO by commercial interests will amplify the lack interest in the negative effects of vaccines as demonstrated in the article in relation to non live virus vaccines, especially the new generation of mRNA products.
Vaccinologist spend years studying their profession. Why don't they fully understand vaccine harms?
This begs the question in which I would love to see a deep conversation about: what vaccine could ever eradicate a disease?...... if that has ever REALLY been done as touted by many pro and not pro vaccine ppl. smallpox, polio. neither are eradicated. It is often parroted and when I hear it, my body intrinsically contracts and rejects this idea. Humans think they can outwit viruses and the microbiome of the earth. Gaia is smarter than that and the ideology is equal to, biting the hand that feeds you. Will humans ever learn?