23 Comments

Yeah, the most innocent excuse for the spike producing treatments would be that they were greedy for money if they had no suspicion of the harm the spike might produce. That came at a massive cost due to the trans-dermal introduction of spike. Most evidence points to less innocent goals. Regulation, prior art and common sense should have put a stop to the mRNA platform.

If the design of the spike bearing virus was deliberate as it seems and the release was planned as it seems and there was any suspicion that the spike was particularly pathogenic then there is no excuse for even designing the product.

If there are bodies that will introduce a pathogenic element (spike) into every person for unstated nefarious goals then global ANTI-BIOLOGICAL WARFARE development is irrelevant. It did not prevent the introduction anywhere and did not provide a remedy anywhere. All that was achieved by funding military /GoF research was the enabling of malign forces to have access to a fear and harm causing pathogen that was used to promote more fear and harm.

Expand full comment

Ralph Baric knew of the effects of spile protein on the heart over 30 years ago:

An Experimental Model for Dilated Cardiomyopathy after Rabbit Coronavirus Infection https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7109931/

Expand full comment

I have yet to hear of a possible explanation. Perhaps you are prepared t venture an opinion.

Putting spike into general circulation, perhaps even a spike on steroids as may have been done seems foolhardy unless you have a PREVENTATIVE for the spike.

The only method I have heard that has very high prevention is nasal washes with various things.

I understand putting evil stuff in a jab that they can avoid but spike is now endemic and was always going to be if it became infectious.

What did they have available in advance, suggestions that HCQ works against SARS-CoV-1?

Expand full comment

Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 99 studies https://c19ivm.org/meta.html

Expand full comment

I have monitored that site all the time. They have a time-line of when adequate evidence was available to be sure of the value of a treatment. NONE of the evidence predates 2020 because there was no way to test for them before covid was in circulation.

I am interested to know what did the perpetrators of this crime know before they put a new virus with nasty spikes into circulation in the same air they breathe?

How did they know they would be safe from the virus that turns out to be nasty if it gets past your mucous membranes?

Expand full comment

Maybe they loaded up on Vitamin D !

Expand full comment

Maybe, that is what our family did. Dr Cicero Coimbra said in Jan-Feb 2020 that "Vitamin-D3 will be very, very, very important for this disease." and he has been working with Vitamin-D3 to treat autoimmune diseases for over 25 years and knows how it works.

However were the perpetrators certain that Vitamin-D3 alone would be enough before the first results were in?

I do believe that this and most other mucosal infections would become a non issue for humanity if everyone was taking at least the 150ug=6000IU that Fauci said he was taking.

Why would he say he is taking 150ug while the Institute of Medicine still recommends 10-20ug for adults? Did he say this during a coded message interview?

I believe that the YGL and others are told what information to support/amplify through open channels with coded signals. It might be lapel pins, hand gestures, corroboration/repetition with Reuters/AP/CNN whoever so they know what line they must push without there being a paper trail that could show that they are being controlled. I dream that the HEALTH Freedom Movement (not medical :-( anything) manages to gain information and control of the side channel messaging system and insert information into there that will brainwash people to become smart again.

We can assume almost all leaders are captured by ideology, ignorance, greed or coercion so trying to control the people without having at least a little help from the top is going to be a very long road.

Vitamin-D3 was the tool of the masses that was neglected, it was not prescription and it was cheap and effective. Ivermectin was a threat so massive they had to squash it and the signs of what they did are all over and it may be the one fact that they cannot sweep under the rug and proves malice.

I wrote up a small wiki because the evidence was so clear to me but people keep asking show me the data and then ignore it except for their own personal benefit.

https://cholecalciferol.miraheze.org/wiki/DOI

https://cholecalciferol.miraheze.org/wiki/Kalle_Pihlajasaari (handy charts for estimating a starting dose)

Expand full comment
Oct 28, 2023·edited Oct 28, 2023

What I want to know and understand is how, in what way, was this spike protein virus RELEASED(yes, we know it was released as it is documented) upon people? Was it sprayed/aerosolized? Was it put into water systems? Was it put onto surfaces?

And if I have not been sick, is it still somehow in me? Through shedding or another way? And if it’s in me why haven’t I become ill?

Expand full comment

Or was covid 19 just rebranded flu, and the hospital protocols did all the killing?

Expand full comment

COVID-19 was not rebranded flu. A flu-like second stage of illness was added (by gain-of-function) to the classic coronavirus symptom sequence/progession. And Fauci et al. emphasized the flu-like symptoms so people would not seek treatment during thd first stage of illness, when HCQ and IVM would be most effective.

Early in the pandemic, doctors like McCullough and Marik were saying, about the patients with severe cases, "This is definitely a novel illness."

Expand full comment

I read parts of the paper. I need to go back again. The focus was on the spike from the shot. It did mention that all spike proteins are pathogenic. The shots have pseudo uridine which the virus does not have, the shots have the lipid nano particle which the virus does not have, the shots are injected straight into the blood stream, whereas the virus is not. I know the paper discusses many of the problems due to these factors related to the shots, but what is the long-term difference between being exposed to the viral spikes vs. the mRNA produced spikes? I am thinking the body would eliminate the virus and spikes as fast as it could, unless the Wuhan lab tweaked the natural virus in ways that would mean long lasting adverse effects. Although, since most children are hardly affected by the natural virus, that would point to the possibility that the danger from spikes lies in those in the shot. I wish I had more clarity on this, because doctors and neighbors talk about long covid, and they don't mention adverse shot effects, although they all took the shot. It is such a bias, but I don't have info to explain the long-term differences between the pathogenicity of viral spike vs. clot shot spike.

Expand full comment

This contradicts the info from the paper, just to show what is said by the other side. This was written by Steve Novella: "The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines produce the full-length spike protein...It is also likely that the full protein contains more epitopes (sites for immune activity) and therefore produces more thorough and longer lasting immunity. The proteins, however, are in a fixed state, they are unable to change their confirmation, which is necessary to bind to cells. So, they function differently than spike proteins on infecting virus... But the vaccine-induced proteins do not appear to cause any harmful effects. This may be because the vaccine is administered in the muscle, and so muscle cells are the ones taking up the mRNA and making spike proteins. There is a vigorous immune response which neutralizes the spike proteins before they can cause any harm. This is very different from a virus replicating throughout the body." Gee he makes the shots seem completely benign.

Expand full comment

What Steve Novella said is a heap of steaming, stinking bovine manure. Pardon my language, but my dedication to the truth sometimes requires harsh language.

Expand full comment

I wouldn't consider your adjectives obscene. I totally agree with you of course. Because we are in an echo chamber so often, I like to sometimes post the rhetoric outside, because it is so far removed from reality and spoken with such confidence that a part of me reacts to it in the form of black humour. But, beyond the superficial laugh, underneath what Dr. Nov. proclaims is very sinister.

Expand full comment

Are these the same as "short DNA's" that can cause adulterations, mutations in the genome? These could be drivers of turbo cancers and autoimmune conditions. I live in an over 55 community where many folks have "hidden" autoimmune blood workups. Thanks for being relentless in this research.

Expand full comment

From what I've heard from truth-telling doctors, you are exactly right about the clot-shots containing short bits of DNA that cause mutations and turbo cancers. I'm not sure about their causing autoimmunity.

Expand full comment

JLW - all of this was known well in advance and none of the consequences suffered are by happenstance. Their actions exhibit clear & evident intent with malice aforethought. These people have blood on their hands.

Expand full comment
Oct 29, 2023·edited Oct 29, 2023

JLW - "This two-part narrative review... This first paper explores..." Where is PART TWO???

Expand full comment

This may seem simplistic but I have come to realize that if ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug and it works to treat covid, why are we not considering that covid is a parasitic illness??

People have treated their cancer with antiparasitic drugs when left to die by medicine.

Both my husband and I (surgeon and PA) now routinely use antiparasitic.

Expand full comment

HCQ also happens to be anti-parasitic. In the UK, it was withdrawn as OTC medicine in December, 2019; in France, a couple of months later. Those responsible were in the know.

Expand full comment

It is a privilege to have access to this information.

Expand full comment