Will this class be one where the "teacher" sits in front of "pupils" and speaks at them about the "facts of the content" or will this be an open exchange between the presenter and those who have signed up?
As part of this presentation will Jessica be covering the history of virology and early studies and experiments that serve as the basis for virology?
She's a fantastic PhD, not medical dr and I've seen zero on her opinions re Israel except peace for the world. If you read her substack she's great at making things easy to understand.
Having a PhD means she can call herself a doctor. I've followed her on Substack for years and loved her work on covid. It's troubling that she seems indifferent to what is happening in Gaza, except that she celebrated when four hostages were rescued, but ignored the over 100 innocent Palestinians that died in the process. It seems to be a blind spot. I would like be shown I am wrong.
I will certainly consider taking the course but would like a bit more info as to course duration (how long expecting each session and how many weeks) and at least a preliminary syllabus.
Sorry but in the absence of valid scientific evidence of any alleged "virus", this appears to be a fraudulent offering.
James still wasn't able to cite any valid evidence during our email exchange the last couple of days, neither could hundreds of institutions in 40 countries that were FOI'd.
Questions: is this an interactive class? What is the reading list? Is there room for questions and conversation? Is this a place one can examine the underlying papers and assumptions that virology is based on? Or are these papers assumed to have reached valid conclusions from the start without careful critique and analysis? Jessica has been a fantastic resource to the anti-lockdown community, but her pro-virology position is shockingly unsupported by actual scientific validity. Many of her articles only make sense if one assumes the underlying assumptions of virology are true, but they have already been falsified and shown to be profoundly logically flawed. This class could be a great conversation opportunity for people if its an open discussion and careful review of the foundational papers in these fields, but if it assumes the validity of government virology and immunology, it's more likely to reify the nonsense and confuse people even further.
Absolutely I will sign up I will learn from her ,she’s so down to earth 😊😊👍👍
Jessica is brilliant!
Will this class be one where the "teacher" sits in front of "pupils" and speaks at them about the "facts of the content" or will this be an open exchange between the presenter and those who have signed up?
As part of this presentation will Jessica be covering the history of virology and early studies and experiments that serve as the basis for virology?
Isn't she a a brilliant doctor, but also a Zionist?
She's a fantastic PhD, not medical dr and I've seen zero on her opinions re Israel except peace for the world. If you read her substack she's great at making things easy to understand.
Having a PhD means she can call herself a doctor. I've followed her on Substack for years and loved her work on covid. It's troubling that she seems indifferent to what is happening in Gaza, except that she celebrated when four hostages were rescued, but ignored the over 100 innocent Palestinians that died in the process. It seems to be a blind spot. I would like be shown I am wrong.
Do you have a senior discount code for this class?
I will certainly consider taking the course but would like a bit more info as to course duration (how long expecting each session and how many weeks) and at least a preliminary syllabus.
Sorry but in the absence of valid scientific evidence of any alleged "virus", this appears to be a fraudulent offering.
James still wasn't able to cite any valid evidence during our email exchange the last couple of days, neither could hundreds of institutions in 40 countries that were FOI'd.
I challenge Jessica to cite any.
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/the-logical-fallacies-of-pseudoscientist-JLW-2024-08.pdf
Questions: is this an interactive class? What is the reading list? Is there room for questions and conversation? Is this a place one can examine the underlying papers and assumptions that virology is based on? Or are these papers assumed to have reached valid conclusions from the start without careful critique and analysis? Jessica has been a fantastic resource to the anti-lockdown community, but her pro-virology position is shockingly unsupported by actual scientific validity. Many of her articles only make sense if one assumes the underlying assumptions of virology are true, but they have already been falsified and shown to be profoundly logically flawed. This class could be a great conversation opportunity for people if its an open discussion and careful review of the foundational papers in these fields, but if it assumes the validity of government virology and immunology, it's more likely to reify the nonsense and confuse people even further.