Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Allen's avatar

Will this class be one where the "teacher" sits in front of "pupils" and speaks at them about the "facts of the content" or will this be an open exchange between the presenter and those who have signed up?

As part of this presentation will Jessica be covering the history of virology and early studies and experiments that serve as the basis for virology?

Michael Wallach's avatar

Questions: is this an interactive class? What is the reading list? Is there room for questions and conversation? Is this a place one can examine the underlying papers and assumptions that virology is based on? Or are these papers assumed to have reached valid conclusions from the start without careful critique and analysis? Jessica has been a fantastic resource to the anti-lockdown community, but her pro-virology position is shockingly unsupported by actual scientific validity. Many of her articles only make sense if one assumes the underlying assumptions of virology are true, but they have already been falsified and shown to be profoundly logically flawed. This class could be a great conversation opportunity for people if its an open discussion and careful review of the foundational papers in these fields, but if it assumes the validity of government virology and immunology, it's more likely to reify the nonsense and confuse people even further.

8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?