Public health policy directed by Marxists is a big problem. it is clear to me that the release of a Bioengineered weapon and a "Planned Ahead" mRNA Bioweapon have been used against most of the civilized world. This proves clearly that it doesn't pay to conform to Civility. Meanwhile Marxists have set the position for the ever changing goal post for "Public Health". Marxists sought "Control" over the global masses. Instead what they got was a percentage of the population who were Coerced into Compliance while the rest of us chose to stand firm against the Global I.Q. Test. No doctor, no prescriptions, no Magic Pills.
In Idaho, local taxes go to a hospital board that (ostensibly) provides oversight to the hospital. Practically, it gets loaded with docs/nurses tied to the hospital (thru uninformed voter choices) so there is less transparency. However, we might be able to leverage the existing system to start implementing planB. 🤔🤔
But how would these be funded? If they are funded by the government then in about five minutes we'd have the same problems we've always had. if they are funded independently, then in about ten minutes they'd be funded by billionaires with their own agendas.
I have some ideas on that. It starts with #RevolutionaryReform legislation package that undoes regulatory capture at all levels, from the smallest issue to campaign finance to the military industrial complex. New legislation that makes corporatist influence impossible and returns the power to the people.
So, everyone currently in the levels, will be replaced?🤔🤨
I mean, either they knew what was occurring (GIGO, corruption, regulatory capture, science/health for hire, etc),and didn't care/too afraid. Or they were oblivious. 😐
Either way doesn't recommend them to continue in their capacity, at least to me.😉
So then getting their buy in on a transfer to "decentralised" public health, will prove...challenging, TSTL.
Not that I don't agree with the concept, despite it reading as essentially same, same, but different. I know "decentralised" is the word du jour, but I mean it really just sounds like lots of downsized versions of the same. However, I'm a simple farmer, so it must just be too complicated concept for my noggin😉.
Personally, I think part of what got us in the mess in the first place was not checking each others work. "...Independent Annual and Real-Time Reports: Each node in the decentralized network produces an independent report on its findings and activities..."
Independent is all well and fine, initially, but ultimately leads back to regulatory capture, nature of the beast. Peer review, catches each others mistakes and blind spots. BTJMHO🤷♀️
Ps the history of the term "decentralised" is rather interesting in itself😉
Thank you for continuing to challenge the status quo, forge new thinking and present solutions, while not necessarily complete of themselves, they are the seeds of creation.🙏
Egad, I saw that, and I hope not. Seems to me that Elliquis (apaxiban) is doing that to a lot of people who were prescribed it to protect against strokes/clots while hospitalized for COVID19. We have two articles on that here so far... Start here - the first article is cited there - https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/whats-killing-americans-and-making-023
Nothing will change until we cease giving intellectual property rights to key personnel bureaucrats and the health agencies they work for. The key personnel receive up to $150k a year annually in royalties and into retirement, if the technology stays relevant. The health agencies get their royalty checks as well. Based on my investigation, frequently the agency patent technology is commingled with the biopharmaceutical companies patent technology, academia scientist patents and so called third party research companies. Anything or anyone who threatens the patent to become obsolete is seen as a threat and they all join together to destroy the threat. No competition. Example…effective early combination treatments for COVID threatened Remdesivir and the vaccine business model. Congress passed the legislation allowing this corruption and they better get us out if it.
Public health policy directed by Marxists is a big problem. it is clear to me that the release of a Bioengineered weapon and a "Planned Ahead" mRNA Bioweapon have been used against most of the civilized world. This proves clearly that it doesn't pay to conform to Civility. Meanwhile Marxists have set the position for the ever changing goal post for "Public Health". Marxists sought "Control" over the global masses. Instead what they got was a percentage of the population who were Coerced into Compliance while the rest of us chose to stand firm against the Global I.Q. Test. No doctor, no prescriptions, no Magic Pills.
In Idaho, local taxes go to a hospital board that (ostensibly) provides oversight to the hospital. Practically, it gets loaded with docs/nurses tied to the hospital (thru uninformed voter choices) so there is less transparency. However, we might be able to leverage the existing system to start implementing planB. 🤔🤔
But how would these be funded? If they are funded by the government then in about five minutes we'd have the same problems we've always had. if they are funded independently, then in about ten minutes they'd be funded by billionaires with their own agendas.
As described, the Senate funds all 80, annually, and walks away. Specifically without oversight.
Clearly, the existing system of public health policy is broken. How do we go from this theoretical fix to actualization and implementation?
I have some ideas on that. It starts with #RevolutionaryReform legislation package that undoes regulatory capture at all levels, from the smallest issue to campaign finance to the military industrial complex. New legislation that makes corporatist influence impossible and returns the power to the people.
🤔"...undoes regulatory capture at all levels..."😐
So, everyone currently in the levels, will be replaced?🤔🤨
I mean, either they knew what was occurring (GIGO, corruption, regulatory capture, science/health for hire, etc),and didn't care/too afraid. Or they were oblivious. 😐
Either way doesn't recommend them to continue in their capacity, at least to me.😉
So then getting their buy in on a transfer to "decentralised" public health, will prove...challenging, TSTL.
Not that I don't agree with the concept, despite it reading as essentially same, same, but different. I know "decentralised" is the word du jour, but I mean it really just sounds like lots of downsized versions of the same. However, I'm a simple farmer, so it must just be too complicated concept for my noggin😉.
Personally, I think part of what got us in the mess in the first place was not checking each others work. "...Independent Annual and Real-Time Reports: Each node in the decentralized network produces an independent report on its findings and activities..."
Independent is all well and fine, initially, but ultimately leads back to regulatory capture, nature of the beast. Peer review, catches each others mistakes and blind spots. BTJMHO🤷♀️
Ps the history of the term "decentralised" is rather interesting in itself😉
Thank you for continuing to challenge the status quo, forge new thinking and present solutions, while not necessarily complete of themselves, they are the seeds of creation.🙏
The most critical aspects of reform are to
a) shut the revolving door between pharma and it’s regulators
b) make all regulatory agencies stop accepting any money from the regulated
c) don’t allow any regulatory agency or it’s employees have any financial interest in the products that they regulate
#PlanB is a good idea but we must go further!
Further than ending the regulatory agencies?
Ending the CDC, FDA, NIH, and NIAID would be awesome!
If that’s a part of #PlanB, I’m all in.
I hadn’t discerned that from your post, perhaps I just missed that part?
"public health" seems to be about controlling the public's health but not promoting it
a recent top geneticist made some pretty alarming comments about how these injections can actually erase people's memories and reform their personalities... https://eccentrik.substack.com/p/sheep-brain-top-molecular-geneticist?utm_campaign=comment&utm_medium=email&utm_source=substack&utm_content=post
could this be one way to manufacture the public's compliance with new 'public health' decrees?
Egad, I saw that, and I hope not. Seems to me that Elliquis (apaxiban) is doing that to a lot of people who were prescribed it to protect against strokes/clots while hospitalized for COVID19. We have two articles on that here so far... Start here - the first article is cited there - https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/whats-killing-americans-and-making-023
Nothing will change until we cease giving intellectual property rights to key personnel bureaucrats and the health agencies they work for. The key personnel receive up to $150k a year annually in royalties and into retirement, if the technology stays relevant. The health agencies get their royalty checks as well. Based on my investigation, frequently the agency patent technology is commingled with the biopharmaceutical companies patent technology, academia scientist patents and so called third party research companies. Anything or anyone who threatens the patent to become obsolete is seen as a threat and they all join together to destroy the threat. No competition. Example…effective early combination treatments for COVID threatened Remdesivir and the vaccine business model. Congress passed the legislation allowing this corruption and they better get us out if it.
I’m starting with my own health and moving to Goldcare (Dr. Simone Gold).
Much more efficient and cost effective. Thanks for all you do spreading truth!