Once again the NY Slimes proved itself to be the paper of record for covering the asses of greedy corporations while pretending to be a beacon of moral and intellectual integrity. And their devoted readers lap up the gibberish like its sacred texts.
If a child by age 6 mo receives 4.4 mg of aluminum via vaccines, then how does an 18 yo child receive 4,000 mcg (or 4.0 mg) from vaccines? It can’t be less. Dr. Wailer should check his numbers.
He must have meant micrograms in the first part as 50 mg in a slice of cheese would be extremely high. That said, processed cheese probably shouldn't be the standard for safety😆.
Li et al. (2018) and Hornung et al (2008) concluded that Aluminum adjuvants in vaccines can activate inflammasome pathways in Natural Killer cells and dendritic cells. Those two immune cells are critical in maintaining homeostasis by using apoptotic signaling to take out infected cells in a non-inflammatory way. When inflammasome pathways are activated, the cells secrete highly inflammatory cytokines that can be very destructive to neuronal tissues leading to symptoms of autism and Alzheimer's.
Dr. Weiler observes that injected aluminum is far more dangerous than ingested aluminum -- injected aluminum is 100% bioavailable while ingested aluminum is only 0.3% bioavailable.
Does that observation suggest that we don't need to be particularly concerned about ingested aluminum, including aluminum that can be ingested from using aluminum cookware, drinking from aluminum beverage cans, etc.?
1) We also can't rely on their estimates of how much aluminum is in the vaccine. They all need to be randomly checked.
2)There is the matter that Toby Rogers and Aaron Siri have reported on of the extremely limited safety studies of aluminum that CDC references such as the rabbit study.
EXCELLENT! THIS IS SOO NEEDED AND SOO WELL DONE. CONCISE, TO THE POINT. THE LIVES, BRAINS AND IMMUNE SYSTEMS OF ALL CHILDREN PRESENT AND FUTUREE DEPEND ON THIS INFORMATION
Aluminum is a neurotoxicant rather than a neurotoxin; known, potent, or otherwise. Yeah, biological organisms, aka malicious injectors, "secreted" it. What a rationalization!
But take it off GRAS entirely; for food, water, cosmetics (e.g., deodorants), and air (geoengineering chemtrails), in addition to injectables. And drink silica water. Aluminum-26 costing £1000 a nanogram does not help biofate and biodistribution studies, though it could become a radiological hazard if more readily available. Half-life does not apply if not excreted; "Unpredictable", as you say. Rodale has long warned about the hazards of aluminum ingestion. I'm so glad my asthma is merely "observational and inconclusive." The MSM's defense of aluminum adjuvants isn't flawed or negligent, it's maliciously disingenuous. Make people sick for life so you can sell them treatments for the induced maladies, then remove them from pensions and Social Security prematurely! Good to know, calcium phosphate can also serve as an adjuvant. Silica water not needed to deal with that.
BTW, NYT's malicious lies not withstanding, long-term vaccine safety studies are not done, or at least not published. Paul Offit's "long-term safety study" merely shows antibody response persist 3 weeks. "Appeals to Authority" are just idolatrous worship of Abraham Flexner and Vannevar Bush.
Sorry (Not!), you got me going, so this is far longer than my typical comments.
1) The NY Times quotes pediatrician Andrew Racine -- who just happens to be CMO of Montefiore Health System. They don't mention the fact that Montifiore Einstein, the medical school associated with Montefiore Health Systems, got a CDC-funded grant SPECIFICALLY to build trust and confidence in pediatric vaccines (including all the aluminum-adjuvanted ones). https://montefioreeinsteinnow.org/update/2024-mar-12/me-receives-federal-grant-to-reduce-vaccine-hesitancy
Yes, that IS a conflict of interest.
So if Racine's employer is paid to reduce vaccine hesitancy (see the title in Montefiore's own link above), how likely is it that he would acknowledge ANY safety concerns?
2) The 1934 clinical trial linked by the NY Times appears to be an efficacy trial, not a safety trials. There is a difference. Why didn't author Teddy Rosenbluth link to a safety trial? Might it be because they typically don't look at long-term sequelae for neonates, like autoimmune issues and neurodevelopment issues?
3) One of the most worrisome concerns regarding aluminum is that it can go into organs and bone. But the NY Times quoted a study that looked for it in blood and hair --where it is essentially excreted, and therefore not in organs or in bone. It does not look for evidence of aluminum in organs or bone.
Funny how they don't find what they're NOT looking for....
“Aluminum salts are incorporated into some vaccine formulations as an adjuvant. An adjuvant is a substance added to some vaccines to enhance the immune response of vaccinated individuals. The aluminum salts in some U.S. licensed vaccines are aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, alum (potassium aluminum sulfate), or mixed aluminum salts. For example: aluminum salts are used in DTaP vaccines, the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, and hepatitis B vaccines. Aluminum adjuvant containing vaccines have a demonstrated safety profile of over six decades of use and have only uncommonly been associated with severe local reactions.”
“When evaluating a vaccine for safety and efficacy, FDA considers adjuvants as a component of the vaccine; they are not licensed separately.”
1) Nowhere do they mention studies that actually showing safety of injecting aluminum salts
2) No mention of severe SYSTEMIC REACTIONS, or damage to kidney, liver, spleen, bone marrow, or central nervous system -- which all just happen to be mentioned in the MSDS for aluminum hydroxide.
3) No definition of "uncommonly" is given? How common is "uncommon?" 0.1%? 1%? 5%?
4). Since adjuvants are not licensed separately, then they are not subject to safety standards.
"On the basis of previous reports showing alum neurotoxic effects in CD1 mice, an additional experiment was done, and showed early brain translocation at day 45 of alum injected subcutaneously at 200μgAl/kg. This study confirms the striking biopersistence of alum. It points out an unexpectedly delayed diffusion of the adjuvant in lymph nodes and spleen of CD1 mice, and suggests the importance of mouse strain, route of administration, and doses, for future studies focusing on the potential toxic effects of aluminum-based adjuvants.”
BRILLIANT DR. WEILER!!!
they get this stuff 'wrong' intentionally. propaganda from the pharma shills. no more. no less.
no doubt...bought and paid for
Once again the NY Slimes proved itself to be the paper of record for covering the asses of greedy corporations while pretending to be a beacon of moral and intellectual integrity. And their devoted readers lap up the gibberish like its sacred texts.
Not merely "greedy corporations" (military contractors), but of their godfather the Federal Reserve, too! You vil be cannon fodder peons and slaves!
They sure do. And the smugness attached to those readers. Ugghhh
Thank you! This is critical information. It needs to get into the hands of the Senators!
If a child by age 6 mo receives 4.4 mg of aluminum via vaccines, then how does an 18 yo child receive 4,000 mcg (or 4.0 mg) from vaccines? It can’t be less. Dr. Wailer should check his numbers.
He must have meant micrograms in the first part as 50 mg in a slice of cheese would be extremely high. That said, processed cheese probably shouldn't be the standard for safety😆.
Use chymosin or Creeping Charlie to curdle the milk.
Take action today.
https://standforhealthfreedom.com/
https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm
Li et al. (2018) and Hornung et al (2008) concluded that Aluminum adjuvants in vaccines can activate inflammasome pathways in Natural Killer cells and dendritic cells. Those two immune cells are critical in maintaining homeostasis by using apoptotic signaling to take out infected cells in a non-inflammatory way. When inflammasome pathways are activated, the cells secrete highly inflammatory cytokines that can be very destructive to neuronal tissues leading to symptoms of autism and Alzheimer's.
Dr. Weiler observes that injected aluminum is far more dangerous than ingested aluminum -- injected aluminum is 100% bioavailable while ingested aluminum is only 0.3% bioavailable.
Does that observation suggest that we don't need to be particularly concerned about ingested aluminum, including aluminum that can be ingested from using aluminum cookware, drinking from aluminum beverage cans, etc.?
1) We also can't rely on their estimates of how much aluminum is in the vaccine. They all need to be randomly checked.
2)There is the matter that Toby Rogers and Aaron Siri have reported on of the extremely limited safety studies of aluminum that CDC references such as the rabbit study.
This article is about the actual measured amounts measured in them compared to what manufacturers say. drchristopherexley.substack.com/p/vaccine-advice-to-parents Also in flu jabs - more dementias?
We need to end Pharma advertising. It corrupts the media. While we are at it, keep their money out of the hands of our legislators
Just abolish Durham-Humphrey, and respect right to choose.
Not my legislooters!
EXCELLENT! THIS IS SOO NEEDED AND SOO WELL DONE. CONCISE, TO THE POINT. THE LIVES, BRAINS AND IMMUNE SYSTEMS OF ALL CHILDREN PRESENT AND FUTUREE DEPEND ON THIS INFORMATION
Aluminum is a neurotoxicant rather than a neurotoxin; known, potent, or otherwise. Yeah, biological organisms, aka malicious injectors, "secreted" it. What a rationalization!
https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/trumps-first-week-the-bad-and-the/comment/88895478
But take it off GRAS entirely; for food, water, cosmetics (e.g., deodorants), and air (geoengineering chemtrails), in addition to injectables. And drink silica water. Aluminum-26 costing £1000 a nanogram does not help biofate and biodistribution studies, though it could become a radiological hazard if more readily available. Half-life does not apply if not excreted; "Unpredictable", as you say. Rodale has long warned about the hazards of aluminum ingestion. I'm so glad my asthma is merely "observational and inconclusive." The MSM's defense of aluminum adjuvants isn't flawed or negligent, it's maliciously disingenuous. Make people sick for life so you can sell them treatments for the induced maladies, then remove them from pensions and Social Security prematurely! Good to know, calcium phosphate can also serve as an adjuvant. Silica water not needed to deal with that.
BTW, NYT's malicious lies not withstanding, long-term vaccine safety studies are not done, or at least not published. Paul Offit's "long-term safety study" merely shows antibody response persist 3 weeks. "Appeals to Authority" are just idolatrous worship of Abraham Flexner and Vannevar Bush.
Sorry (Not!), you got me going, so this is far longer than my typical comments.
To add to Dr. Lyons-Weiler's excellent rebuttal:
1) The NY Times quotes pediatrician Andrew Racine -- who just happens to be CMO of Montefiore Health System. They don't mention the fact that Montifiore Einstein, the medical school associated with Montefiore Health Systems, got a CDC-funded grant SPECIFICALLY to build trust and confidence in pediatric vaccines (including all the aluminum-adjuvanted ones). https://montefioreeinsteinnow.org/update/2024-mar-12/me-receives-federal-grant-to-reduce-vaccine-hesitancy
Yes, that IS a conflict of interest.
So if Racine's employer is paid to reduce vaccine hesitancy (see the title in Montefiore's own link above), how likely is it that he would acknowledge ANY safety concerns?
2) The 1934 clinical trial linked by the NY Times appears to be an efficacy trial, not a safety trials. There is a difference. Why didn't author Teddy Rosenbluth link to a safety trial? Might it be because they typically don't look at long-term sequelae for neonates, like autoimmune issues and neurodevelopment issues?
3) One of the most worrisome concerns regarding aluminum is that it can go into organs and bone. But the NY Times quoted a study that looked for it in blood and hair --where it is essentially excreted, and therefore not in organs or in bone. It does not look for evidence of aluminum in organs or bone.
Funny how they don't find what they're NOT looking for....
2) Because there are no safety trials; published anyhow!
While I'm studying Al adjuvants for 12 years... I strongly agree with James comments.
Thank you James!
Yes!!!!!!!!!!
Aluminum: What Does the FDA Say?
“Aluminum salts are incorporated into some vaccine formulations as an adjuvant. An adjuvant is a substance added to some vaccines to enhance the immune response of vaccinated individuals. The aluminum salts in some U.S. licensed vaccines are aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, alum (potassium aluminum sulfate), or mixed aluminum salts. For example: aluminum salts are used in DTaP vaccines, the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, and hepatitis B vaccines. Aluminum adjuvant containing vaccines have a demonstrated safety profile of over six decades of use and have only uncommonly been associated with severe local reactions.”
“When evaluating a vaccine for safety and efficacy, FDA considers adjuvants as a component of the vaccine; they are not licensed separately.”
https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineSafety/ucm187810.htm
RED FLAGS AND OUTRIGHT PROBLEMS:
1) Nowhere do they mention studies that actually showing safety of injecting aluminum salts
2) No mention of severe SYSTEMIC REACTIONS, or damage to kidney, liver, spleen, bone marrow, or central nervous system -- which all just happen to be mentioned in the MSDS for aluminum hydroxide.
3) No definition of "uncommonly" is given? How common is "uncommon?" 0.1%? 1%? 5%?
4). Since adjuvants are not licensed separately, then they are not subject to safety standards.
MOUSE STUDY
Aluminum in lymph nodes, spleen, and brain
45 days after intramuscular injection
"On the basis of previous reports showing alum neurotoxic effects in CD1 mice, an additional experiment was done, and showed early brain translocation at day 45 of alum injected subcutaneously at 200μgAl/kg. This study confirms the striking biopersistence of alum. It points out an unexpectedly delayed diffusion of the adjuvant in lymph nodes and spleen of CD1 mice, and suggests the importance of mouse strain, route of administration, and doses, for future studies focusing on the potential toxic effects of aluminum-based adjuvants.”
J Inorg Biochem. 2015 Nov;152:199-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
Highly delayed systemic translocation of aluminum-based adjuvant in CD1 mice following intramuscular injections.
Crépeaux G1, Eidi H2, David MO3, Tzavara E4, Giros B4, Exley C5, Curmi PA3, Shaw CA6, Gherardi RK7, Cadusseau J8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26384437