34 Comments

Despite some hiccups, I'm very grateful this subject is now being openly discussed. It feels like progress to me :)

Expand full comment

The ole "plausible deniability"

Expand full comment

I'll soon publish a list of all studies comparing vaxxed with unvaxxed children: it proves they are being poisoned!

The full PLAN exposed:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed

16 laws we need to exit Prison Planet

Politics got us in, politics is the way out ... after prayers!

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/laws-to-exit-planet-prison

Expand full comment

Great article/response to Offit, Jack!

Michael

Expand full comment

Offit has no credibility. The most aversive action to take against a publicity whore is to ignore him☠️

Expand full comment

At least we can all agree that the more foreign matter introduced to the developing brain, the better. Noone can argue with that. Why doesn’t the esteemed and highly scientific CDC simply gather health stats on all of the Amish and publish the data. That way all of us anti science cretins can be shutdown forever. Shouldn’t take long.

Expand full comment

It's not Offit. It's just plausible deniability. He's just another mason or mercenary:

The full PLAN exposed:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed

16 laws we need to exit Prison Planet

Politics got us in, politics is the way out ... after prayers!

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/laws-to-exit-planet-prison

Who are “the powers that shouldn't be”?

In the USA, some believe in a “deep state” conspiracy involving the Department of Defense, intelligence agencies, corrupt politicians, military industrial complex, Big Pharma agency capture, etc. Yet, they can’t explain how this “USA deep state” also works in synchronicity, within hundreds of countries, where there’s no DoD, FBI, CIA, HHS, etc. There’s no money trail and no favor-returning revolving-door linking USA with any other country’s deep state, yet all governments followed the same scripted injuring COVID-response. Clockwork coordination of COVID genocidal response proved the existence of a “global deep state”, despite there is no global government!

There are no political or economic structures “formally” supporting such global governance. Then, who could run a government in the shadows without no mainstream media exposing it? Who controls global media in order to guarantee global censorship? Who has the network to pay political parties and political careers in hundreds of countries to control global politics?

In all countries, worship still had restrictions when everything else was opened in full. Casinos were packed in Vegas while churches lock-downed. Why were churches the last to recover freedom in every single lockdowned country without any exception? Is there a secret war between the city of Satan or the civilization of God?

Most people still doubt that Freemasonry was behind the scenes. Why? masonic secrecy. Why do they need secrecy to the extent of murdering those who violate it? What do they need to hide? Good deeds or crimes? Not goodness but evil needs secrecy in order to grow unchecked!

How could anybody explain that the framework for this bio-bombing was made legal through nuanced patient changes in the legislation puzzle during decades, until leaving everybody in the merciless hands of the Pharmafia/Pharmaterrorists, under the full protection of DoD legal immunity for COVID injectable bio-bombs? Which other entity other than Freemasonry could have pulled this off ?

Isn't it strange that all COVID injectable biobombs were abortion laced? It's because they are all Satanic laced! It’s no coincidence that Freemasons worship Lucifer as “the great architect”.

Expand full comment

He gets kick-backs from Big Pharma for this crap, and has for decades. Why would anyone believe a word he says? I agree. Ignore him. He's not a whore. That's an insult to women. He's a male who cares more about status and money than harm he is causing innocent human beings. Like so many other men.

Expand full comment

Protecting his profits. He patented a profitable vaccine for Rotavirus.

Expand full comment

Dr. Profit already had this discussion years ago with Mr. Kennedy and had to admit he was wrong. But that didn’t stop Dr. Profit from continuing to lie about it. Remember that initially he was afraid of the COVID shots because, as he said, mRNA tech never worked before and might make people look at the entire vax schedule. Glad he’s getting what he feared. Most of our childrens problems and many of the adult chronic degenerative diseases are from those vaxs. Read the inserts they never provide you. There is no real informed consent.

Expand full comment

I have this odd theory about names being occasional windows into ??? Bobbett,Bolt ect. many exist :(Loving vs Virginia : won right to LOVE across color lines)

I think “Off it “ is a telling name for this creep.

I think its ether some cosmic joke or something else like A Psycic Warning ?

Strange but , I know we are designed to see correlations like our human facial recognition. primitive warning system?

heres a new

coinkedink: TITANic sub from OceanGATE (water,pizza,ect.)

CEO:Stock-ton?Rush?

Made ton of profit by rushing the tech a bit like all our Pfizer pals.

Just some crazy thoughts. 🤷‍♀️🥸

Thanks for your work✌️

Expand full comment

It wasn't about rushing the tech or profits, just exterminating us:

Gates-WHO: vaccines can’t reduce population, except by murdering

Proof: reducing infant mortality, can’t reduce population growth!

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depop-vaccines-no-myth

Expand full comment

Is Offut still human? Or has he been replaced with a lizard from outer space?

Expand full comment

I'll go with that gender for this quack - Off It!

Expand full comment

As a non-scientist I have such a hard time evaluating the claims and counterclaims. Am I the only one? Fyi, not big on vaxxes, so don't get me wrong. But it's so hard for the layman to get a grip on all this. The COVID vax injured me and woke me up. Still trying to learn.

Expand full comment

I think one of Dr. Lyone-Weiler's I-Pak courses is focused on learning to read scientific papers.

Expand full comment

It takes a while and the data studies I believe are intentionally confusing . They don’t want people of normal intelligence who aren’t educated in the sciences to know the truth. I learned from Dr. Bean as he breaks down studies and information for free. Many you tube videos. Del with The High Wire also does a great job getting experts on to explain in lay terms what the studies mean. The flccc.net has weekly zoom anyone can attend and learn their research. There are many good resources. It just takes time.

Expand full comment

I listen to a lot of scientists and am capable of reading scientific papers. But without a sound technical understanding of virology and molecular biology and biochemistry and a few other fields, I'll never really understand.

Expand full comment

Nor will 99.99% of the public and most the PhD’s and MD’s out there. Don’t let that stop you. I took on a commissioner in New York State, who tried to push the vaccines on my mother and my disabled brother, who is in a NYS group home. He could not debate me on the evidence, even though he was a pediatrician,he had to resort to giving me his opinion, and his advice without one bit to support it and even having to agree with me about not having evidence of long term safety and that the shots weren’t trialed against stopping transmission. The idiot told me he had both his pregnant daughters take the shots. I didn’t have the heart to tell him that there was an 83 percent increase in first trimester miscarriages in the vaccine arm than the placebo group. When have we ever told pregnant women to take something that had not been well studied that didn’t have a ton of evidence behind it?! What happened to even common sense? That doesn’t need an ability to understand the intricacies of the science. By the way, both mom and my brother keep high vitamin D levels and were directly exposed to people with Covid who had been vaccinated and even had to be hospitalized but not my brother nor my mother. My brother didn’t even get sick, not once and he was exposed a lot.

Expand full comment

I've actually worked in tech for a long time and have worked with large data sets and data science, and I can readily decode such studies and papers better. Yet I'm humbled by my experience over the decades plowing into fields that I've 'read my way to expertise' in, only to later find out how badly I'd been rolled by certain 'studies'. What I've found that is without the grounding in the essentials of a given field, it's really hard to put any data in context.

Perhaps you are misunderstanding me? I'm not at all reluctant to utterly reject most of public health in the U.S. today. COVID and the VAX are crimes against humanity, nothing less. People should be swinging from gallows in my mind. I've turned down meds due to my own research etc. I'm just sharing that at some basic level I have a bit of uncertainty about my views on all this. Cuz really, all I'm doing is trusting a different set of experts. And yes, I agree with Malone and McCullough and many, many others and find them compelling, But I'm an idiot about subjects in which they are experts so of course I'm impressed.

I think you and I are much more aligned than you might think. I'm just trying maintain a realistic POV on my own limitations.

Expand full comment

You are being overly cautious because you want to have all the pieces of the puzzle to feel confident. I can appreciate that and that because this isn’t your field there is that uncertainty and you want to be that certain. Having worked in nursing and advocacy for my severely disabled brother I have had to go against people in power, people who know how to play their game when I am a neophyte to their system, their institutions. I had to drag out studies that I had some but not complete comprehension in to challenge doctors. I expected them to show me where I was wrong. They couldn’t. They count on us to defer because they can’t back up their opinions by showing the flaws in the studies presented to them. If they can’t do it then I know I don’t have to have the last piece of the puzzle. I have enough to know. That’s my point. I would love to understand the research to the extent that I can call out all the flaws whether statistically or design or computational but that would take deep study and years for me but I can rely on what I know has been changed to make this whole Covid disaster work for the promoters of this crisis. So many policies, practices and standards were changed, no studies needed to know that, that normally would have been left in place that you have to know this was very wrong. Something as simple as since when do we ever tell pregnant women to take an experimental drug should send major red flags up everywhere. Since when would we say give experimental drugs to children, to babies? OMG no!!!! Common sense can be our guide without knowing the intricacies of the studies. If we see a dead person in front of us do we need a study to agree they are dead?! I don’t mean to be harsh because we are I think on the same page but I am so tired of the ignorant people thinking they know something when they truly are ignorant and then we have a person like you who is educated well beyond them but still careful in their knowledge because they are smart enough to know they don’t know everything so they come across less confident than the actual bozos. We need your confidence. Make them prove you wrong. They can’t.

Expand full comment

I asked if anyone else had the humble impulse to be careful about what they think they 'know' about all this as a layperson. that's it. I'm not overly cautious, rather, I'm an actual intellectual who's quite aware of how people can talk themselves into just about anything. You are a nurse who has some practical and educational grounding in all of this whereas I do not. I'm quite outraged by all of this, I'm just 'checking' myself as any person should do. It's interesting how you need to tell me I'm wrong for doing this somehow. I'll continue to be careful about assuming I know things for certain about all this, such intellectual humility has served me very well so far in my 60 years.

Expand full comment

cc: James

So Where Is YOUR Scientific Evidence Malone ?

Ralph Baric Said That "Gain Of Function"

Was "Poised" For Human Emergence. Seriously? Okay:

As I Stand, I Bend My Knees, And I Point To The Sky.

I Am "Poised" To Go To Mars .

-You Can Bet Your Ass I'll Get There Before Baric's

Gain Of Function Can Be Viably Sustained In Our Air.

There Is No Gain Of Function Pathogen In The Air.

That's The Hoax - And A Good One. Ain't It Bob ?

Expand full comment

But Jack, all of this is methodically and rigorously collected data is just "noise" - -remember the Upton Sinclair's maxim - "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." Until you actually link his salary, or his financial/legal disincentive, to actually caring about facts, it will remain noise. Offit is no more a scientist than the Biden's Press Secretary...functionaries to narratives.

Expand full comment

Offit is well aware of the toxicity of mercury.

“...When I mentioned the Burbacher study to Stratton and Offit, they both went silent. It was obvious that they were aware of the study. THEY BOTH KNEW that science had refuted what they were telling me...” RFK, Jr.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/about-us/mercury-vaccines-cdcs-worst-nightmare/

Expand full comment