New Data Support Vaccine-Induced Pathogenic Priming from Vaccine but Not from Infection
New Data Support Vaccine-Induced Pathogenic Priming from Vaccine but Not from Infection
This answers the first and final question on pathogenic priming
In April 2020, when I coined the phrase “Pathogenic Priming” and presented data to alert vaccine manufacturers that they may well cause harm due to molecular mimicry between the SARS-CoV-2 proteins they chose to put into any vaccine, the natural question asked then, and since, has been “do you think pathogenic priming would happen from exposure via vaccine and infection equally”?
I would usually answer “theoretically both could happen, and one could prime the other if the same or similar proteins are in the vaccine”.
Now, data are in that suggest, at least for two of the worst of the adverse conditions, only spike protein is implicated, NOT the rest of the virus involved. This from Dr. Paul Alexander’s Substack; Paul highlighted (from the study) that
‘Surprisingly, only spike protein but no nucleocapsid protein could be detected within the foci of inflammation in both the brain and the heart, particularly in the endothelial cells of small blood vessels. Since no nucleocapsid protein could be detected, the presence of spike protein must be ascribed to vaccination rather than to viral infection. The findings corroborate previous reports of encephalitis and myocarditis caused by gene-based COVID-19 vaccines.’
The link to the study
"Since no nucleocapsid protein could be detected, the presence of spike protein must be ascribed to vaccination rather than to viral infection." Isn’t there’s third possibility? Transmission of the spike from a vaccinated person to an unvaccinated person who never had covid?
Don’t remember name, D Cell?, test by a company around Utah can detect Spike One from vaccines vs other sources. Anyone?