"The fact that, according to our observations, around ⅘ of the dead from the Corona epidemic for some time now are not unvaccinated persons, but persons who have been vaccinated once or several times with the inadequate vaccines, is mendaciously presented to the contrary."
"The fact remains, however, that those who have been vaccinated can spread the Corona epidemic and thus infect the unvaccinated and those who have already been vaccinated, just as they can infect the so-called ‘cured’ with the epidemic pathogen again. The so-called experts know this very well, but they keep quiet about it and suppress the truth from the public, because the public is of the opinion that immunity is caused by the development of antibodies through vaccination."
Early in this post you write: "A Guidance from the UK is clear: Moderna has 36 events per 100,000 doses; that’s twice per person compared to 36 events per 100K in the baseline data."
The sentence is confusing in its own right, and the mystery deepens when one clicks on your link to the UKHSA guidance. That guidance states that as of mid-November, there were 36 cases of myocarditis reported per 1,000,000 (not 100,000!) doses of the Modern vaccine. And it states that in study of a roughly 20 year period of NHS hospital admissions, myocarditis represented approximately 36 per 100,000 admissions. These statistics are not straightforwardly comparable, and your decimal error aside, it's not clear what comparison you intended to draw (or note) between them.
You are correct about the UK Guidance. The numbers were not comparable due to differences in time period. It was intended to set context, not make a comparison, and my decimal error was regrettable. Thank you, Jason.
Triple & Double Vaccinated accounted for 4 in every 5 Covid-19 Deaths in England over the past month despite most vulnerable getting Booster in October
Now how was it possible for BEAM to know that on November 28, 2021, three weeks before the study from the new UK Health Security Agency as stated in CR787?
Vinay did a follow up video on the UK study and the data is even more alarming for males under 40. The moderna 2nd dose mycoarditis rates were almost 10X higher than natural infection.
Can I ask you to please spell out how you obtain the numbers 61 and 746 from Table 3 in the second study (the Nature Medicine one)? And also the following overall rates (), please. 4.18, 1.931 and 2.153 pr. 100k.
Detail: This study investigates people over 16 years old; not just under 40's, as you state in your overview. In fact, most are older; cf. Table 1.
Please see the Billy Eduard Albert Meier (BEAM) Contact Report 787 warning on the vaccinations (https://www.futureofmankind.info/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_787):
"The fact that, according to our observations, around ⅘ of the dead from the Corona epidemic for some time now are not unvaccinated persons, but persons who have been vaccinated once or several times with the inadequate vaccines, is mendaciously presented to the contrary."
"The fact remains, however, that those who have been vaccinated can spread the Corona epidemic and thus infect the unvaccinated and those who have already been vaccinated, just as they can infect the so-called ‘cured’ with the epidemic pathogen again. The so-called experts know this very well, but they keep quiet about it and suppress the truth from the public, because the public is of the opinion that immunity is caused by the development of antibodies through vaccination."
Excellent and timely analysis Dr Jack! Thank you - you are a boon to medical science!
That's Captain Jack :)
Early in this post you write: "A Guidance from the UK is clear: Moderna has 36 events per 100,000 doses; that’s twice per person compared to 36 events per 100K in the baseline data."
The sentence is confusing in its own right, and the mystery deepens when one clicks on your link to the UKHSA guidance. That guidance states that as of mid-November, there were 36 cases of myocarditis reported per 1,000,000 (not 100,000!) doses of the Modern vaccine. And it states that in study of a roughly 20 year period of NHS hospital admissions, myocarditis represented approximately 36 per 100,000 admissions. These statistics are not straightforwardly comparable, and your decimal error aside, it's not clear what comparison you intended to draw (or note) between them.
You are correct about the UK Guidance. The numbers were not comparable due to differences in time period. It was intended to set context, not make a comparison, and my decimal error was regrettable. Thank you, Jason.
Triple & Double Vaccinated accounted for 4 in every 5 Covid-19 Deaths in England over the past month despite most vulnerable getting Booster in October
https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/18/triple-vaccinated-account-4-in-5-covid-deaths/
Now how was it possible for BEAM to know that on November 28, 2021, three weeks before the study from the new UK Health Security Agency as stated in CR787?
Vinay did a follow up video on the UK study and the data is even more alarming for males under 40. The moderna 2nd dose mycoarditis rates were almost 10X higher than natural infection.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.23.21268276v1.full.pdf
Can I ask you to please spell out how you obtain the numbers 61 and 746 from Table 3 in the second study (the Nature Medicine one)? And also the following overall rates (), please. 4.18, 1.931 and 2.153 pr. 100k.
Detail: This study investigates people over 16 years old; not just under 40's, as you state in your overview. In fact, most are older; cf. Table 1.