20 Comments
User's avatar
User's avatar
Comment deleted
May 11, 2024
Comment deleted
User's avatar
Comment deleted
May 11, 2024
Comment deleted
iya's avatar

I'm not here to argue either. Just pointing you towards the work of someone who has written voluminous papers over the last twenty or so years. If you were already aware of his science work & charge model (which explains how things really work better than the mainstream model, including the building of the elements), then just move on.

If you weren't aware of Mathis, or if you were & had written him off based on a quick superficial reading, then I suggest taking the time to delve a bit deeper.

A brief overview of his work from an independent source can be found here:

https://thehonestscientist.wordpress.com/miles-mathis/

User's avatar
Comment deleted
May 11, 2024
Comment deleted
iya's avatar

I suspect both of you have more in common than you think. His "charge" field, your "EMF patterns".

James Lyons-Weiler, PhD's avatar

not even close... as far as I know...

User's avatar
Comment deleted
May 11, 2024Edited
Comment deleted
James Lyons-Weiler, PhD's avatar

Sure, but as far as I know, this has little to do with the fundamentals of w.

LONG In The TRUTH's avatar

Hey, Jamie - presuming 'In' is short for 'Integer' (?) Bigger question I want to ask, though - can you point me towards any papers which identified biologically-internalized stainless-steel nanoparticulates that are materially indicated as having come from hypodermic needles? Thanks - whatever assistance you can lend, is (as always) MUCH appreciated!

Kayla Wildman's avatar

For a moment there, I read "lognormal" as "ignormal." I like that word. I think I'll keep it. "ignormal (noun) the average and accepted level of ignorance in a population"

Surak's avatar

Ln = natural logarithm. Lognormal is the name of a distribution. Oh my God, please stop. This is such a freaking embarrassment.

James Lyons-Weiler, PhD's avatar

Check out Gatti and Montanari's work

LONG In The TRUTH's avatar

Will DO - and thanks AGAIN, sir!

Dr. Kevin Stillwagon's avatar

It's used in exponential decay or growth equations. This might come in handy to describe certain side effects of a certain thing.

Maurine Meleck's avatar

W=In(10/4) +Z= Out the door+numbers e,p and i make a tasty pecan pie.

My theory may make you wary,but I find esoteric math very scary.

AJ Welding's avatar

w the letter before x.

The first letter in WTF

Can also look like two saggy boobs if incorporated into a drawing.

Twice as many Vs as V.

Very important in the number tWenty fWee.

James Lyons-Weiler, PhD's avatar

Lmao thanks for laugh, but... no

Kayla Wildman's avatar

Excellent, excellent, AJWelding! A sincere thank you for your illuminating response to this critical question.

AJ Welding's avatar

I do my best to enlighten. But it does require some dumbing down.

Kayla Wildman's avatar

Well, I appreciate your sense of humor...