20 Comments
deletedMay 11
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Miles Mathis has analysed dark matter here: http://milesmathis.com/dark2.pdf

http://milesmathis.com/darkmatter.pdf

Expand full comment
deletedMay 11
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I'm not here to argue either. Just pointing you towards the work of someone who has written voluminous papers over the last twenty or so years. If you were already aware of his science work & charge model (which explains how things really work better than the mainstream model, including the building of the elements), then just move on.

If you weren't aware of Mathis, or if you were & had written him off based on a quick superficial reading, then I suggest taking the time to delve a bit deeper.

A brief overview of his work from an independent source can be found here:

https://thehonestscientist.wordpress.com/miles-mathis/

Expand full comment
deletedMay 11
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I suspect both of you have more in common than you think. His "charge" field, your "EMF patterns".

Expand full comment
author

not even close... as far as I know...

Expand full comment
deletedMay 11·edited May 11
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
author

Sure, but as far as I know, this has little to do with the fundamentals of w.

Expand full comment

Hey, Jamie - presuming 'In' is short for 'Integer' (?) Bigger question I want to ask, though - can you point me towards any papers which identified biologically-internalized stainless-steel nanoparticulates that are materially indicated as having come from hypodermic needles? Thanks - whatever assistance you can lend, is (as always) MUCH appreciated!

Expand full comment
author

Ln = lognormal

Expand full comment

For a moment there, I read "lognormal" as "ignormal." I like that word. I think I'll keep it. "ignormal (noun) the average and accepted level of ignorance in a population"

Expand full comment

Ln = natural logarithm. Lognormal is the name of a distribution. Oh my God, please stop. This is such a freaking embarrassment.

Expand full comment
author

Check out Gatti and Montanari's work

Expand full comment

Will DO - and thanks AGAIN, sir!

Expand full comment

It's used in exponential decay or growth equations. This might come in handy to describe certain side effects of a certain thing.

Expand full comment
author

lol

Expand full comment

W=In(10/4) +Z= Out the door+numbers e,p and i make a tasty pecan pie.

My theory may make you wary,but I find esoteric math very scary.

Expand full comment
author

lmao no

Expand full comment
May 11Liked by James Lyons-Weiler

w the letter before x.

The first letter in WTF

Can also look like two saggy boobs if incorporated into a drawing.

Twice as many Vs as V.

Very important in the number tWenty fWee.

Expand full comment
author

Lmao thanks for laugh, but... no

Expand full comment

Excellent, excellent, AJWelding! A sincere thank you for your illuminating response to this critical question.

Expand full comment

I do my best to enlighten. But it does require some dumbing down.

Expand full comment

Well, I appreciate your sense of humor...

Expand full comment