Then there will come newer studies, and it'll be "the new science supercedes the old science", and it may look less impressive - but they won't say / know / try to know why, ... ?
Okay this is good for the average person that does not understand that things go much, much deeper.
Firstly, it is rather comical we have to have these studies, the anecdotal evidence for centuries tells us we have natural immunity. We also know that if a virus is also present in the animal kingdom we will have variants forever, their is no other option, Animals are hosts too.
What the deeper part is is the immunity. A properly nourished and healthy individual that has not been exposed to toxins, including pharma products, has a health status that will shun any issues a virus may bring.
This is the elephant in the room no one talks about: The lifestyle of most humans is so toxic that they will get sick, but the health status of people that live cleanly, let's call it that, will not get sick, they will not get cancer, heart disease, etc.
By cleanly I mean NO pharma products (including toxic vaccinations), plenty of plant life consumption, and understanding of what the body needs to grow and produce health. The immune system is part of health, it is not the health alone, it is the army, navy, and marines of the body. The immune system does not create health—it protects it. The prior sentence is important to understand.
One other important point. Ask your doctor how many hours they trained on the immune system. Once you get that terrifying answer realize they get zero training on creating health. They simply apply one or more toxic substance to a symptom, and realize too that most symptoms are from the immune system fighting disease. In a war it is messy business. But the irony is the doctor is actually fighting the immune system. This is our medial system in action and why they don't get a handle of health, it is a fraud.
It’s been interesting to watch him as he followed the mainstream narrative as events unfolded. He was very pro vax and it’s been good to see a professional keep digging and questioning. Now he has landed on herd immunity and although he doesn’t reflect to much, I believe he is quite astonished at how we have responded as a world to “taking care “ of each other. The video where he talks about how, in request to a freedoms of information act, the British government reveled that only 18,000 people had died in the uk of just covid (on the death certificate) over the last 2 years is impactful. You can tell that he is deeply troubled, even though he doesn’t express it in words.
As bad as these mRNA transfections are or may turn out to be, getting covid naturally isn't necessarily a cakewalk for some, even otherwise healthy folks. It's not a case of good vs bad. It's just a risk assessment. It doesn't mean you don't suffer if you make the 'better' choice. You might be worse in the short term but better off in the long term or vice versa. That said, the efforts to demonize effective early treatments and mandate these dubious transfections are clearly an attempt to remove your ability as an individual to make those risk assessments with clarity and conviction. For that, I have nothing but contempt.
"I gradually stopped viewing. I'd even wondered if maybe I just wasn't getting his subtle British sarcasm" - speaking of "subtle British sarcasm": https://www.bitchute.com/video/ca1S3Ha5HkJS/
Yeah, he's not unbiased. Look at the poster in the background and a masked (!) toy (!) dog (!) on his windowsill.
The irony was especially bitter when he reviewed papers dealing with non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as washing one's hands, wearing a face diaper, and distancing -- all the while having the propaganda poster in the background that urged to perform that rain dance.
We also have the CDC's own study -- which divided the population in question (over 21 million people) into four mutually exclusive cohorts: 1. YES Vax -- YES Natural Immunity (previous C19 diagnosis); 2. YES Vax -- NO Nat Im (No C19); 3. NO Vax -- YES Natural Immunity (previous C19 diagnosis).; and 4. NO Vax -- NO Nat Im(No C19).
YES Vax in this study according to the CDC means "fully vaccinated."
The cohort which did best overall for beneficial health outcomes: 3. NO vaccine -- YES Natural Immunity (previous C19 diagnosis). And it significantly outperformed cohort 2. YES Vax -- NO Nat Im (No C19). In fact, the only cohort which did nearly as well as 3, was 1. YES Vax -- YES Natural Immunity (previous C19 diagnosis).
The results: beyond dispute, Natural Immunity protects better than "Fully Vaccinated."
Original CDC study report: León TM, Dorabawila V, Nelson L, et al. COVID-19 Cases and Hospitalizations by COVID-19 Vaccination Status and Previous COVID-19 Diagnosis — California and New York, May–November 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;71:125–131. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7104e1
Always love a good John Campbell video!
Oddly, right after omicron showed up he started pushing vaccination. Hard.
Thank you for this article!
I wonder whether that changes if stuff like this is true: https://www.rintrah.nl/suppression-of-the-innate-immune-system-the-main-cause-of-the-pandemic-of-the-fully-vaccinated/
Then there will come newer studies, and it'll be "the new science supercedes the old science", and it may look less impressive - but they won't say / know / try to know why, ... ?
I watched one day when he "discovered" IVM . Fascinating
Here is a less than positive review on John Campbell. https://hugotalks.com/2022/02/13/dr-john-campbell-hugo-talks-lockdown/
Okay this is good for the average person that does not understand that things go much, much deeper.
Firstly, it is rather comical we have to have these studies, the anecdotal evidence for centuries tells us we have natural immunity. We also know that if a virus is also present in the animal kingdom we will have variants forever, their is no other option, Animals are hosts too.
What the deeper part is is the immunity. A properly nourished and healthy individual that has not been exposed to toxins, including pharma products, has a health status that will shun any issues a virus may bring.
This is the elephant in the room no one talks about: The lifestyle of most humans is so toxic that they will get sick, but the health status of people that live cleanly, let's call it that, will not get sick, they will not get cancer, heart disease, etc.
By cleanly I mean NO pharma products (including toxic vaccinations), plenty of plant life consumption, and understanding of what the body needs to grow and produce health. The immune system is part of health, it is not the health alone, it is the army, navy, and marines of the body. The immune system does not create health—it protects it. The prior sentence is important to understand.
One other important point. Ask your doctor how many hours they trained on the immune system. Once you get that terrifying answer realize they get zero training on creating health. They simply apply one or more toxic substance to a symptom, and realize too that most symptoms are from the immune system fighting disease. In a war it is messy business. But the irony is the doctor is actually fighting the immune system. This is our medial system in action and why they don't get a handle of health, it is a fraud.
It’s been interesting to watch him as he followed the mainstream narrative as events unfolded. He was very pro vax and it’s been good to see a professional keep digging and questioning. Now he has landed on herd immunity and although he doesn’t reflect to much, I believe he is quite astonished at how we have responded as a world to “taking care “ of each other. The video where he talks about how, in request to a freedoms of information act, the British government reveled that only 18,000 people had died in the uk of just covid (on the death certificate) over the last 2 years is impactful. You can tell that he is deeply troubled, even though he doesn’t express it in words.
150 Research Studies Affirm Naturally Acquired Immunity to Covid-19: Documented, Linked, and Quoted https://brownstone.org/articles/79-research-studies-affirm-naturally-acquired-immunity-to-covid-19-documented-linked-and-quoted/
As bad as these mRNA transfections are or may turn out to be, getting covid naturally isn't necessarily a cakewalk for some, even otherwise healthy folks. It's not a case of good vs bad. It's just a risk assessment. It doesn't mean you don't suffer if you make the 'better' choice. You might be worse in the short term but better off in the long term or vice versa. That said, the efforts to demonize effective early treatments and mandate these dubious transfections are clearly an attempt to remove your ability as an individual to make those risk assessments with clarity and conviction. For that, I have nothing but contempt.
he is amazing. and his british wit is so on point, especially about certain things he can't comment extensively on :-)
Sir John Campbell !!!
"I gradually stopped viewing. I'd even wondered if maybe I just wasn't getting his subtle British sarcasm" - speaking of "subtle British sarcasm": https://www.bitchute.com/video/ca1S3Ha5HkJS/
Bookmarked--thanks!
Yeah, he's not unbiased. Look at the poster in the background and a masked (!) toy (!) dog (!) on his windowsill.
The irony was especially bitter when he reviewed papers dealing with non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as washing one's hands, wearing a face diaper, and distancing -- all the while having the propaganda poster in the background that urged to perform that rain dance.
We also have the CDC's own study -- which divided the population in question (over 21 million people) into four mutually exclusive cohorts: 1. YES Vax -- YES Natural Immunity (previous C19 diagnosis); 2. YES Vax -- NO Nat Im (No C19); 3. NO Vax -- YES Natural Immunity (previous C19 diagnosis).; and 4. NO Vax -- NO Nat Im(No C19).
YES Vax in this study according to the CDC means "fully vaccinated."
The cohort which did best overall for beneficial health outcomes: 3. NO vaccine -- YES Natural Immunity (previous C19 diagnosis). And it significantly outperformed cohort 2. YES Vax -- NO Nat Im (No C19). In fact, the only cohort which did nearly as well as 3, was 1. YES Vax -- YES Natural Immunity (previous C19 diagnosis).
The results: beyond dispute, Natural Immunity protects better than "Fully Vaccinated."
Data Dashboard with the CDC report data in an easier-to-browse format: https://rpubs.com/Thom_JH/cdc_natural_immunity
Comments here: https://americanexile.substack.com/p/the-political-persecution-of-americans?r=oznpm
Original CDC study report: León TM, Dorabawila V, Nelson L, et al. COVID-19 Cases and Hospitalizations by COVID-19 Vaccination Status and Previous COVID-19 Diagnosis — California and New York, May–November 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;71:125–131. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7104e1