Coumadin (Warfarin - drug the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation-supported Karl Paul Link developed). Much cheaper and has an antidote, though requires monitoring and consistent dietary vitamin K intake. Or just blow $594 a month. At least in case of overdose you need only be cautious about injury for somewhat over apixaban's 9-14 h elimination half-life or until you can get your $22,120 andexanet alfa. :) The US patient population must really roll in dough!
Consistent dietary vit. K intake is desirable. But are you familiar with "warfarin diet"? That idiotic idea of suppressing and/or eliminating vit. K intake spread like the plague, while the correct solution should have always been the coumadine dosage adjustment as per status. Untold harm has been caused by all those dietary quacks over the last two decades.
What is "GBH" in your context? A late friend gave me his alfalfa powder because the VA said it fouled his response to Coumadin. Um, isn't 100 g of green tea rather a lot to take in at once?
"Ask your Doctor"... Given my experience having survived just the past four years, that is a very difficult ask now. Good luck. Seriously! You're going to need it in this low trust environment.
It's really much simpler and practical: People have loved one receive 2x the dose per the product label and their doctors do not know it. When presented w/this information, each doctor should reduce the dose of ALL patients who are over 80, less than 60kg, or have high serum creatinine.
Can't patients read their own product inserts? You take the products prescribed you, so ought to be familiar with them and how they affect you personally. You doctor may prescribe thousands of medications, so would need a phenomenal memory to be familiar with all the product inserts, and probably has personally tried very few of them. Even if he have tried whatever he prescribe you, it may not have affected him the same at it affects you. (Did US - apparently the Canadians did - doctors and pharmacists personally experience the hot lots of covid jabs?) You might however consult with your pharmacist.
More to the point, pharmacies rarely offer or provide the inserts. You must ask, and even then don't count on it. Your prescription may be for 30 or fewer pills from a bottle of 1000. Physicians desk samples usually have the insert in the small box. You'd probably have to read the insert for a jab in the pharmacy; not hard if they're blank as alleged.
All these drugs are toxic to the body when taken long term I believe. Dr. McCullough wrote an article that Epoch TImes posted on the benefits of statins. I read that a third of people on statins have adverse effects affecting their muscles. A doctor's wheelhouse is drug prescription for the most part, and has its place, but it seems in general the risks outweigh benefits, the lists of adverse effects are not to be minimized, they serve as a warning.
You know I realized after your post that I made a mistake and gave wrong information, I actually read it on his Substack, not the Epoch Times. I can't comment on the substack as I have a free subscription, but I saw the overall reaction was one of disappointment. I can see how statins would benefit dementia but again they cause other harms, and so focusing on one benefit is unbalanced. Also, health is a holistic deal, conventional doctors including Dr. McCullough simply don't have that type of education; their lens is narrow focused on symptom management and not the broader approach of true health enhancement.
That article he just posted on statins being good for preventing dementia was huge red flags. As an expert cardiologist he must know the terrible effects of statins and he knows our brains are fueled by cholesterols and in fact we need the good cholesterol. I read a great book by a NASA Doctor on statins and for most people the risks outweigh the benefits Also the way a statin helps the body is by fighting inflammation . Bringing down the chlosterol is not why the statin works People need to start doing their own research Not sure why MCCullough wrote that piece on statins yesterday!!
Serrapeptase and EDTA were my way out of being Pham animal
As a substitute blood thinner for Eliquis? I know about serrapeptase and how it works, but need more information on edta.
Coumadin (Warfarin - drug the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation-supported Karl Paul Link developed). Much cheaper and has an antidote, though requires monitoring and consistent dietary vitamin K intake. Or just blow $594 a month. At least in case of overdose you need only be cautious about injury for somewhat over apixaban's 9-14 h elimination half-life or until you can get your $22,120 andexanet alfa. :) The US patient population must really roll in dough!
Consistent dietary vit. K intake is desirable. But are you familiar with "warfarin diet"? That idiotic idea of suppressing and/or eliminating vit. K intake spread like the plague, while the correct solution should have always been the coumadine dosage adjustment as per status. Untold harm has been caused by all those dietary quacks over the last two decades.
I suppose zero is "consistent".
Yeah, consistent with GBH. "Common belief", and all that. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4998867/
What is "GBH" in your context? A late friend gave me his alfalfa powder because the VA said it fouled his response to Coumadin. Um, isn't 100 g of green tea rather a lot to take in at once?
It’s a enzyme that dissolves any non living organic material in the body . It’s what the silk worm uses to dissolve the cocoon
Thank you!
So many people are on Eliquis, including, according to the Daily Mail, Biden.
Do you think that lion's mane mushroom powder would be helpful?
Again, huge appreciation for your research.....
I didn't realize The Big Guy population be so numerous! :) How many of them are grifting Devilcraps?
"Ask your Doctor"... Given my experience having survived just the past four years, that is a very difficult ask now. Good luck. Seriously! You're going to need it in this low trust environment.
Patients informing doctors is the point.
Got it! A wave of authoritarianism flowing back out to sea. Our curiousness up regulates the reaction.
It's really much simpler and practical: People have loved one receive 2x the dose per the product label and their doctors do not know it. When presented w/this information, each doctor should reduce the dose of ALL patients who are over 80, less than 60kg, or have high serum creatinine.
Can't patients read their own product inserts? You take the products prescribed you, so ought to be familiar with them and how they affect you personally. You doctor may prescribe thousands of medications, so would need a phenomenal memory to be familiar with all the product inserts, and probably has personally tried very few of them. Even if he have tried whatever he prescribe you, it may not have affected him the same at it affects you. (Did US - apparently the Canadians did - doctors and pharmacists personally experience the hot lots of covid jabs?) You might however consult with your pharmacist.
Patients with memory issues won't know to read product inserts, especially if their doctors don't read them!!!
More to the point, pharmacies rarely offer or provide the inserts. You must ask, and even then don't count on it. Your prescription may be for 30 or fewer pills from a bottle of 1000. Physicians desk samples usually have the insert in the small box. You'd probably have to read the insert for a jab in the pharmacy; not hard if they're blank as alleged.
All these drugs are toxic to the body when taken long term I believe. Dr. McCullough wrote an article that Epoch TImes posted on the benefits of statins. I read that a third of people on statins have adverse effects affecting their muscles. A doctor's wheelhouse is drug prescription for the most part, and has its place, but it seems in general the risks outweigh benefits, the lists of adverse effects are not to be minimized, they serve as a warning.
He also posted the prostatin piece & dementia in his SS. He was BLASTED for it.
You know I realized after your post that I made a mistake and gave wrong information, I actually read it on his Substack, not the Epoch Times. I can't comment on the substack as I have a free subscription, but I saw the overall reaction was one of disappointment. I can see how statins would benefit dementia but again they cause other harms, and so focusing on one benefit is unbalanced. Also, health is a holistic deal, conventional doctors including Dr. McCullough simply don't have that type of education; their lens is narrow focused on symptom management and not the broader approach of true health enhancement.
That article he just posted on statins being good for preventing dementia was huge red flags. As an expert cardiologist he must know the terrible effects of statins and he knows our brains are fueled by cholesterols and in fact we need the good cholesterol. I read a great book by a NASA Doctor on statins and for most people the risks outweigh the benefits Also the way a statin helps the body is by fighting inflammation . Bringing down the chlosterol is not why the statin works People need to start doing their own research Not sure why MCCullough wrote that piece on statins yesterday!!
I concur Deb!
I wonder how the effects of serrapeptase, nattokinase, lumbrokinase and krill oil supplements compare to Eliquis in safety and benefits.
Thank you for this very important information
Why not? Most medications prescribed now cause a problem to create another one for another prescription. It’s all by design.😳