This is an fallacious article. The "viruses don't exist" crowd do not claim that viruses do not exist, rather that viruses are created by cells for a purpose and that they are not contagious. Huge difference.
When a cell dies, the body cleans up and bacteria and viruses play their roles.
Additionally, the in-silico Covid genome is a fabrication. Don't fool yourself. Study how it's done.
Why then was this never part of the training for doctors, nurses or mid levels? Why did we not participate in labs where we learned how this works what the machines are-look like even??
If viruses are such an integral part of pathology, it just seems we should have spent some time on learning the methods to conclude that.
Now we have the conundrum that you may understand what you are saying but it is meaningless to most others.
How about a course where we get to see the lab, the machines and the techniques.
I mean UPMC has suites for family to view surgical procedures so why if we can do that we cannot see how you or others do what you do......
YESSSS!!!! (Pumping fist in air.) I have two long-time friends who were courageous, articulate and admirable advocates of ending water fluoridation on grounds of impeccable scientific evidence of harm to health and downstream aquatic environment plus the blatantly obvious violation of ethical principles of informed consent. One is Christine Massey who inexplicably has abandoned her formerly credible intellect to say that viruses and virology don't exist. The other now says the earth is flat. There is no figuring that out.
As someone with a BSc in molecular biology and an open mid I have gone down a few of the rabbit holes.
I think there is a spectrum of beliefs all the way to "viruses don't exist". Some of this is well poisioning in my opinion, to make the covid skeptics look stupid ("flat earthers are conspiracy theorists therefore Epstein Island shouldn't be looked into" type stuff).
- PCR tests don't show active infection and can be misused.
- Everything within 28 days of an unreliable positive test is classed as a covid death.
- Testing numbers vary wildly and can be used to generate the numbers that politicians want to see.
I think all of those statements are true.
As far as I am aware there is no conclusive proof that the virus being sequenced is the causative agent of covid (happy to look into any evidence provided).
Drosten's test was pretty much guesswork as I understand it. Took the previous SARS genome, tweaked it a bit, sent it to China until he got some matches and declared it a "gold standard". Flu has disappeared for 2 and a half years. (Though I saw at one point the UK was testing for covid 1000x more than for the flu - false positives alone would be more than the total number of flu tests done).
When combined all of the above statements make it far less conclusive that the tests are actually meaningful.
Low vitamin D is a big factor in severe covid. Covid symptoms vary massively, from asymptomatic, to fever, coughs, heart issues, death. 1 in 6 common colds is caused by a coronavirus.
When combined I can see the reason "viruses don't exist" made traction, though a lot of people are probably like me in doubting the certainty of the science about covid being the causal agent of whatever has been going around. This gets exaggerated by people with less understanding of biology than me and gets turned into viruses don't exist.
Then there is the terrain theory and viruses being exosomes, the result of illness not the cause. I haven't looked into this in any depth, but it seems plausible. Other problems with the germ theory are outbreaks of colds in isolated antarctic research stations. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2536217/
I think it's fair to say we don't understand viral transmission anywhere near as well as "the experts" claim to.
Like I say, if anyone has good evidence that counters my points above, I am more than willing to look at them evidence and update my opinion, just as I have done in the last two and a half years to reach my current opinions, which are a lot less sure than what I was taught in a 4 year degree in a related subject.
Dude, either prove them wrong or let it go. It’s a bad look either way. A fucking nerd war. Ugh.
You keep twisting what Lanka and Kaufman and Cowan are saying to suit your narrative. I have never read a single article or listened to a single interview by one of them where they say viruses don’t exist. They say pathogenic viruses exist. They agree to finding proteins.
They disagree that putting a specimen into bovine calf serum and antibiotics and green monkey cells and witnessing cell death is proof of a pathogenic virus. I’m a doctor in a different field and can’t see how anyone can justify this kind of fuckery as legitimate science.
Mixing a bunch of shit together, watching it decay, and blaming it on the “virus”? Sorry, bubs. You’re obviously very smart and cannot help if you were sold lies. It’s not too late to get to the bottom of it.
Mate, fundamental misunderstandings abound in your logic.
It’s not that these sequences do not exist, obviously proteins sequences exist, it’s that the particles themselves are not in fact “pathologically contagious” and have never been scientifically proven to be so.
Before getting all excited and name-cally at least get your fundamentals consistent..
Doctor, how do you respond to Dr Kary Mullis’s assertions about the use of his PCR?
Also, isn’t it possible to believe or know that a virus exists but that it may not be the sole culprit of the disease? Could it be that conditions are favorable for virus to replicate in a host/to incur disease? Is medicine/Science looking at the big picture?
Wow! Thanks for this info! Appreciate all your true science!
This is an fallacious article. The "viruses don't exist" crowd do not claim that viruses do not exist, rather that viruses are created by cells for a purpose and that they are not contagious. Huge difference.
When a cell dies, the body cleans up and bacteria and viruses play their roles.
Additionally, the in-silico Covid genome is a fabrication. Don't fool yourself. Study how it's done.
Why then was this never part of the training for doctors, nurses or mid levels? Why did we not participate in labs where we learned how this works what the machines are-look like even??
If viruses are such an integral part of pathology, it just seems we should have spent some time on learning the methods to conclude that.
Now we have the conundrum that you may understand what you are saying but it is meaningless to most others.
How about a course where we get to see the lab, the machines and the techniques.
I mean UPMC has suites for family to view surgical procedures so why if we can do that we cannot see how you or others do what you do......
YESSSS!!!! (Pumping fist in air.) I have two long-time friends who were courageous, articulate and admirable advocates of ending water fluoridation on grounds of impeccable scientific evidence of harm to health and downstream aquatic environment plus the blatantly obvious violation of ethical principles of informed consent. One is Christine Massey who inexplicably has abandoned her formerly credible intellect to say that viruses and virology don't exist. The other now says the earth is flat. There is no figuring that out.
As someone with a BSc in molecular biology and an open mid I have gone down a few of the rabbit holes.
I think there is a spectrum of beliefs all the way to "viruses don't exist". Some of this is well poisioning in my opinion, to make the covid skeptics look stupid ("flat earthers are conspiracy theorists therefore Epstein Island shouldn't be looked into" type stuff).
- PCR tests don't show active infection and can be misused.
- Everything within 28 days of an unreliable positive test is classed as a covid death.
- Testing numbers vary wildly and can be used to generate the numbers that politicians want to see.
I think all of those statements are true.
As far as I am aware there is no conclusive proof that the virus being sequenced is the causative agent of covid (happy to look into any evidence provided).
Drosten's test was pretty much guesswork as I understand it. Took the previous SARS genome, tweaked it a bit, sent it to China until he got some matches and declared it a "gold standard". Flu has disappeared for 2 and a half years. (Though I saw at one point the UK was testing for covid 1000x more than for the flu - false positives alone would be more than the total number of flu tests done).
When combined all of the above statements make it far less conclusive that the tests are actually meaningful.
Low vitamin D is a big factor in severe covid. Covid symptoms vary massively, from asymptomatic, to fever, coughs, heart issues, death. 1 in 6 common colds is caused by a coronavirus.
When combined I can see the reason "viruses don't exist" made traction, though a lot of people are probably like me in doubting the certainty of the science about covid being the causal agent of whatever has been going around. This gets exaggerated by people with less understanding of biology than me and gets turned into viruses don't exist.
Then there is the terrain theory and viruses being exosomes, the result of illness not the cause. I haven't looked into this in any depth, but it seems plausible. Other problems with the germ theory are outbreaks of colds in isolated antarctic research stations. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2536217/
I think it's fair to say we don't understand viral transmission anywhere near as well as "the experts" claim to.
Like I say, if anyone has good evidence that counters my points above, I am more than willing to look at them evidence and update my opinion, just as I have done in the last two and a half years to reach my current opinions, which are a lot less sure than what I was taught in a 4 year degree in a related subject.
Dude, either prove them wrong or let it go. It’s a bad look either way. A fucking nerd war. Ugh.
You keep twisting what Lanka and Kaufman and Cowan are saying to suit your narrative. I have never read a single article or listened to a single interview by one of them where they say viruses don’t exist. They say pathogenic viruses exist. They agree to finding proteins.
They disagree that putting a specimen into bovine calf serum and antibiotics and green monkey cells and witnessing cell death is proof of a pathogenic virus. I’m a doctor in a different field and can’t see how anyone can justify this kind of fuckery as legitimate science.
Mixing a bunch of shit together, watching it decay, and blaming it on the “virus”? Sorry, bubs. You’re obviously very smart and cannot help if you were sold lies. It’s not too late to get to the bottom of it.
Mate, fundamental misunderstandings abound in your logic.
It’s not that these sequences do not exist, obviously proteins sequences exist, it’s that the particles themselves are not in fact “pathologically contagious” and have never been scientifically proven to be so.
Before getting all excited and name-cally at least get your fundamentals consistent..
"No legacy is so rich as honesty."- written by Shakespeare not Hershel Walker.
Wish I understood this aspect of science. I find Shakespeare easier.
Thanks, I tried.
I always learn from Dr. Jame's newsletters and classes at https://ipak-edu.org . Thank you.
Doctor, how do you respond to Dr Kary Mullis’s assertions about the use of his PCR?
Also, isn’t it possible to believe or know that a virus exists but that it may not be the sole culprit of the disease? Could it be that conditions are favorable for virus to replicate in a host/to incur disease? Is medicine/Science looking at the big picture?
This is just a cognitive infiltration DDOS attack. Ignore them.
https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/getting-over-the-code-delusion
These idiots beg a quick calculator to play blackjack with them.
Proof right in their face, and they prevaricate, move goalposts, twist words.