It would be helpful if you could cite a meaningful example of how the health freedom movement is, or has become, less welcoming or safe for non whites in support of your assertion that it's a fact, and not just a contrivance or opinion.
This idea that the "movement" is hostile to non-whites is news to me, in fact it's done a great deal t…
It would be helpful if you could cite a meaningful example of how the health freedom movement is, or has become, less welcoming or safe for non whites in support of your assertion that it's a fact, and not just a contrivance or opinion.
This idea that the "movement" is hostile to non-whites is news to me, in fact it's done a great deal to highlight the racial injustice of the allopathic health-industrial-complex, it's history of discrimination and genocide, the sudden deaths of African leaders who've resisted the COVID scam, and how Africa has largely embraced alternative and early treatment, and has among the lowest vaccination rates and case rates.
At any rate, this really is not germane to the topic of this post. Allow me to pose a relevant question. Why is it now not just acceptable, but encouraged, for example, for people to talk about "taking pride in Black culture and heritage," but were someone to utter the phrase "I'm proud of my white culture and heritage" it would be grounds for destroying their life and rendering them unemployable, and in some cases result in their criminal prosecution for a hate crime? No equivocation, prevarication, "whataboutism," or otherwise deviating from the real question or changing the subject is allowed.
Bonus points if you can respond without sarcasm, condescension, derision, and insults.
(Another bonus if you can pinpoint when and where the concept of equality was substituted with that of "equity," and argue how endeavoring for an equal outcome for all is inherently superior to endeavoring for an equal playing field, where those perform the best are assured the best outcome, and how equity would be better for the individual and for society.)
It would be helpful if you could cite a meaningful example of how the health freedom movement is, or has become, less welcoming or safe for non whites in support of your assertion that it's a fact, and not just a contrivance or opinion.
This idea that the "movement" is hostile to non-whites is news to me, in fact it's done a great deal to highlight the racial injustice of the allopathic health-industrial-complex, it's history of discrimination and genocide, the sudden deaths of African leaders who've resisted the COVID scam, and how Africa has largely embraced alternative and early treatment, and has among the lowest vaccination rates and case rates.
It is my opinion the whole issue is a contrivance, that the US, though not perfect, led the world in racial acceptance and equality in most metrics, and the media, universities, and think tanks who propagate racial conflict are funded by people who have a vested interest in a deeply divided, distracted, and conflict ridden populace. The (incidentally Black) author of The Covid Blog agrees with me- https://thecovidblog.com/2021/10/15/depopulation-agenda-planned-parenthood-from-its-documented-beginnings-in-1916-race-based-eugenics-to-2021-global-genocide/
At any rate, this really is not germane to the topic of this post. Allow me to pose a relevant question. Why is it now not just acceptable, but encouraged, for example, for people to talk about "taking pride in Black culture and heritage," but were someone to utter the phrase "I'm proud of my white culture and heritage" it would be grounds for destroying their life and rendering them unemployable, and in some cases result in their criminal prosecution for a hate crime? No equivocation, prevarication, "whataboutism," or otherwise deviating from the real question or changing the subject is allowed.
Bonus points if you can respond without sarcasm, condescension, derision, and insults.
(Another bonus if you can pinpoint when and where the concept of equality was substituted with that of "equity," and argue how endeavoring for an equal outcome for all is inherently superior to endeavoring for an equal playing field, where those perform the best are assured the best outcome, and how equity would be better for the individual and for society.)