Evidence published in April 2021 shows that the chance for vaccine immunity was lost with the Beta variant. Plus some bad and good news about Delta and Omicron from realm of viral evolutionaryomics.
Omicron might yet prove the `vaccine` that (nearly) none of us can avoid, but one which helps provoke a healthy immune response and does so with far less risk than the Pfizer or Moderna mRNA vaccines. Time will shortly tell.
Q - will prophylaxis like quercetin to get zinc into cells, D, C and others help? and I value your work and would appreciate it if in your next major, detailed article you include language explaining to people without advanced degrees in biology. I am inclined to take your course.
One of the theories trying to explain the origins of SARS-COV-2 is from Dan Sirotkin (harvard2thebighouse.substack.com). He claims that the earliest circulating strains might have come from de-attenuation of a LAV vaccine that was tested on unwitting subjects in Wuhan. A process of de-attenuating might result from common evolutionary pressures causing the re-emergence of previously effective solutions. So if we see this ADE enhancing epitope rapidly emerging as early as Jan 2020 that might fit such a theory. Dan Sirotkin also suggested that the apparent early high fatality rate in Wuhan might have been caused by ADE. The population might been exposed to a vaccine candidate and then a mutated version of that virus, with ADE enhancing epitopes exactly as discussed here.
If there really is a Pfizer vs Moderna modified spike protein difference that involves that exact sequence, I would be very interested to hear why. Amidst such unlikely miracles as producing vaccine candidates in 48 hours for a novel virus, some of these drug company wizards were also tweaking out suspect sequences that they identified how?
I took the Pfizer nucleic acid sequence (Fig. 1) from the Stanford sequence citation above, and ran it through the ExPASy translation tool. I actually do see LYQDVNC in the Pfizer sequence (as well as the Moderna sequence (Fig. 2)) What am I missing or doing wrong?
Shocking if true that Moderna and Pfizer have differing spike antigen sequences. But Moderna and Pfizer seem to have identical spike proteins that get produced by their mRNAs. So no tinkering with spike antigen at Moderna, or do you have additional sources of moderna mRNA sequence ?
With your just released updated correction that both Moderna and Pfizer contain the ADE epitope LYQDVNC, is it a moot point now that since much of the world took these already ... is a correction now going to change/attenuate their future potential outcome? Also, since the pathologist found that all four popular vaccines showed the ADE tissue response, is this epitope LYQDVNC also in the other two?
Omicron might yet prove the `vaccine` that (nearly) none of us can avoid, but one which helps provoke a healthy immune response and does so with far less risk than the Pfizer or Moderna mRNA vaccines. Time will shortly tell.
Q - will prophylaxis like quercetin to get zinc into cells, D, C and others help? and I value your work and would appreciate it if in your next major, detailed article you include language explaining to people without advanced degrees in biology. I am inclined to take your course.
One of the theories trying to explain the origins of SARS-COV-2 is from Dan Sirotkin (harvard2thebighouse.substack.com). He claims that the earliest circulating strains might have come from de-attenuation of a LAV vaccine that was tested on unwitting subjects in Wuhan. A process of de-attenuating might result from common evolutionary pressures causing the re-emergence of previously effective solutions. So if we see this ADE enhancing epitope rapidly emerging as early as Jan 2020 that might fit such a theory. Dan Sirotkin also suggested that the apparent early high fatality rate in Wuhan might have been caused by ADE. The population might been exposed to a vaccine candidate and then a mutated version of that virus, with ADE enhancing epitopes exactly as discussed here.
If there really is a Pfizer vs Moderna modified spike protein difference that involves that exact sequence, I would be very interested to hear why. Amidst such unlikely miracles as producing vaccine candidates in 48 hours for a novel virus, some of these drug company wizards were also tweaking out suspect sequences that they identified how?
That was a dynamite post. Thanks.
IF they allow it.
They are priming people for the third dose in Australia now.
I took the Pfizer nucleic acid sequence (Fig. 1) from the Stanford sequence citation above, and ran it through the ExPASy translation tool. I actually do see LYQDVNC in the Pfizer sequence (as well as the Moderna sequence (Fig. 2)) What am I missing or doing wrong?
Shocking if true that Moderna and Pfizer have differing spike antigen sequences. But Moderna and Pfizer seem to have identical spike proteins that get produced by their mRNAs. So no tinkering with spike antigen at Moderna, or do you have additional sources of moderna mRNA sequence ?
https://twitter.com/gibarian1979/status/1475385967158693891
With your just released updated correction that both Moderna and Pfizer contain the ADE epitope LYQDVNC, is it a moot point now that since much of the world took these already ... is a correction now going to change/attenuate their future potential outcome? Also, since the pathologist found that all four popular vaccines showed the ADE tissue response, is this epitope LYQDVNC also in the other two?
I plan on avoiding the jab forever. I'm going to meet my maker a pureblood as he made me. ☺️