"The best way to protect yourself and others" was parroted for a long time. Some were fired for not obeying the groupthink mob mentality that continued after the truth was known.
What Pfizer did, what the CDC did, what every government authority mandating a jab did - it’s all FRAUDULENT!
I’m no lawyer, but there should be enough criminal fraud in all of this to put Pfizer into bankruptcy and ruin the careers of hundreds of lying weasels. Go for it!
No vaccine is tested for stopping transmission. They are considered successful if they create antibodies, which turns out to be not a good indicator of health nor immunity. It’s the big scam that of all vaccines.
We were told it would make the the vaccinated a dead end. I don't care that the vaccines weren't tested for transmission prevention (How exactly would one test that pre-authorization anyway?). I care that there was mass messaging by the scientific community that was either incompetent or a lie. I also care that people like Dr. Oliver don't seem to care about that last bit.
Also, delaying infection is a dubious benefit as well. I've calculated that pretty much across all age groups, delaying first incidence of covid by 3 years increases IFR by 40% simply due to aging. Sparing some ICU beds or hoping for better acute treatments by delaying covid is and was in no way guaranteed to offset that increased risk, which applies to most of the population.
and whether john campbell read every study or not is irrelevant. the mass of humanity being pressured to get vaccinated certainly didn't read every study. they listened to the president, to fauci, to walensky, to rachel madcow, to every idiot talking head spewing propaganda on every MSM news program every minute of every day.
my health coach told me that the pfizer and moderna websites were very clear about the limitations of the shots but that the media and government were pushing them like they were the 2nd coming. how many lay people read those websites before getting vaccinated?
My favorite part was throwing the measles vaccine under the bus to defend the mRNA injections. That one might have some blowback down the line. Not too thoughtful of a strategy.
We / they already know for more then a century that no disease is transmissible. That is why they also never tested this for the flu or polio shots or any of their only harmful injections.
Rosenau 1918 Flu experiment, a landmark study in which they tried everything to transmit the flu from one to an other human being, but never happened.
-
Experiments Upon Volunteers to Determine the Cause and Mode of Spread of Influenza, Boston, November and December, 1918 - M. J. Rosenau
If contagious disease would exist, nobody would be alive to beLIEve in this nonsense.
If it would be possible to 'catch' the flu or covid, almost everyone should 'get' it. But most people don´t as it is a detox happening mostly in spring and fall, depending on the climate you live in. As temperature are not to extreme, easy for your body and a good moment to detox.
There seems to be a signaling function between people to start these detoxes, just like with laughing and yawning.
So only the people who need to detox, will detox, not (almost) everyone.
The symptoms which are called the dis-ease, are the natural healing of the body removing toxins, so it restores a healthy balance. (!)
Problem is, viruses are not contagious in the first place! So why bother with jabs? Other than to add to the profits of Big Pharma and Pollute your body?! Virusesarenotcontagious.com fear not and be not deceived by illusions! 😊
I'm a little confused by this post. I read it a couple times.
You say the the FDA "To win approval, any vaccine must be at least 50% more effective than placebo in preventing the disease.".
You say "Preventing disease means it needed to prevent a PCR+ positive test.
I realize if you don't have a PCR positive test, you supposedly you don't even have any virus in your body. But the endpoint required this only 50% of the time, so this endpoint still wouldn't require this to be a sterilizing vaccine that prevents transmission.
REDUCTION OF TRANSMISSION IS NOT ‘PREVENTION’. I get this (I sure wish the general public did).
Strange dog lady says "it's pretty clear that transmission wasn't an end point in the trial." I take this to be a true statement James, transmission wasn't an endpoint in the trial. What am I missing?
👽🐶🧑: "JC seems to think that testing for transmission is normally part of clinical trials"
AGAIN, FDA SAID SO… - when did the FDA say they were testing for transmission?
You make a couple more statements that say the FDA required testing for transmission... THEN THE FDA, BY THEIR STATED LEVEL OF EVIDENCE, SHOULD NOT HAVE APPROVED THE VACCINE. THIS IS WHY IT’S SCANDALOUS. & NO, HE JUST UNDERSTANDS THE LEVEL OF SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE THE FDA SAID THEY WERE GOING TO REQUIRE. LIKE THE REST OF UNDERSTAND AND RECALL.
Can someone help me out here, I'm missing something... In my understanding, the FDA didn't require testing for transmission.
One thing I didn't miss is your kind and compassionate heart JLW. By transcribing Susan Oliver's video, we didn't have to listen to her ourselves. For that, I am deeply grateful. 🙏🙏🙏
This is priceless for those who like real facts that lead to concrete conclusions!
What Pfizer did, what the CDC did, what every government authority mandating a jab did - it’s all FRAUDULENT!
I’m no lawyer, but there should be enough criminal fraud in all of this to put Pfizer into bankruptcy and ruin the careers of hundreds of lying weasels. Go for it!
No vaccine is tested for stopping transmission. They are considered successful if they create antibodies, which turns out to be not a good indicator of health nor immunity. It’s the big scam that of all vaccines.
So on point! All the stuff I wish I could tell everyone.
Not scandalous if this was the intent......
We were told it would make the the vaccinated a dead end. I don't care that the vaccines weren't tested for transmission prevention (How exactly would one test that pre-authorization anyway?). I care that there was mass messaging by the scientific community that was either incompetent or a lie. I also care that people like Dr. Oliver don't seem to care about that last bit.
Also, delaying infection is a dubious benefit as well. I've calculated that pretty much across all age groups, delaying first incidence of covid by 3 years increases IFR by 40% simply due to aging. Sparing some ICU beds or hoping for better acute treatments by delaying covid is and was in no way guaranteed to offset that increased risk, which applies to most of the population.
and whether john campbell read every study or not is irrelevant. the mass of humanity being pressured to get vaccinated certainly didn't read every study. they listened to the president, to fauci, to walensky, to rachel madcow, to every idiot talking head spewing propaganda on every MSM news program every minute of every day.
my health coach told me that the pfizer and moderna websites were very clear about the limitations of the shots but that the media and government were pushing them like they were the 2nd coming. how many lay people read those websites before getting vaccinated?
Anytime I think we've found everything we've needed to know... I'm not surprised
Incredible , informative and creative!
Thank you for your continued perseverance!
A day without Popular Rationalism is like a day without sunshine!
My favorite part was throwing the measles vaccine under the bus to defend the mRNA injections. That one might have some blowback down the line. Not too thoughtful of a strategy.
We / they already know for more then a century that no disease is transmissible. That is why they also never tested this for the flu or polio shots or any of their only harmful injections.
Rosenau 1918 Flu experiment, a landmark study in which they tried everything to transmit the flu from one to an other human being, but never happened.
-
Experiments Upon Volunteers to Determine the Cause and Mode of Spread of Influenza, Boston, November and December, 1918 - M. J. Rosenau
https://www.gjenvick.com/Influenza/TheRosenauExperiment-1918-1919.html
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/idx/f/flu/3750flu.0016.573/11/--experiments-upon-volunteers-to-determine-the-cause-and-mode page 21 Results
-
The 1918 contagion experiment, scroll down to epidemiological studies
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862332/
-
On the epidemiology of influenza (2008) https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-422X-5-29#Sec3
If contagious disease would exist, nobody would be alive to beLIEve in this nonsense.
If it would be possible to 'catch' the flu or covid, almost everyone should 'get' it. But most people don´t as it is a detox happening mostly in spring and fall, depending on the climate you live in. As temperature are not to extreme, easy for your body and a good moment to detox.
There seems to be a signaling function between people to start these detoxes, just like with laughing and yawning.
So only the people who need to detox, will detox, not (almost) everyone.
The symptoms which are called the dis-ease, are the natural healing of the body removing toxins, so it restores a healthy balance. (!)
Colds and Flu are DETOX: https://www.bitchute.com/video/4Dqvo1yrwK3U/
Great article.
The 'experts' lied. The 'doctors' lied. The 'fact-checkers' lied. It's simple, they lied, and innocent people died because of these poison injections.
Problem is, viruses are not contagious in the first place! So why bother with jabs? Other than to add to the profits of Big Pharma and Pollute your body?! Virusesarenotcontagious.com fear not and be not deceived by illusions! 😊
I'm a little confused by this post. I read it a couple times.
You say the the FDA "To win approval, any vaccine must be at least 50% more effective than placebo in preventing the disease.".
You say "Preventing disease means it needed to prevent a PCR+ positive test.
I realize if you don't have a PCR positive test, you supposedly you don't even have any virus in your body. But the endpoint required this only 50% of the time, so this endpoint still wouldn't require this to be a sterilizing vaccine that prevents transmission.
REDUCTION OF TRANSMISSION IS NOT ‘PREVENTION’. I get this (I sure wish the general public did).
Strange dog lady says "it's pretty clear that transmission wasn't an end point in the trial." I take this to be a true statement James, transmission wasn't an endpoint in the trial. What am I missing?
👽🐶🧑: "JC seems to think that testing for transmission is normally part of clinical trials"
AGAIN, FDA SAID SO… - when did the FDA say they were testing for transmission?
You make a couple more statements that say the FDA required testing for transmission... THEN THE FDA, BY THEIR STATED LEVEL OF EVIDENCE, SHOULD NOT HAVE APPROVED THE VACCINE. THIS IS WHY IT’S SCANDALOUS. & NO, HE JUST UNDERSTANDS THE LEVEL OF SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE THE FDA SAID THEY WERE GOING TO REQUIRE. LIKE THE REST OF UNDERSTAND AND RECALL.
Can someone help me out here, I'm missing something... In my understanding, the FDA didn't require testing for transmission.
One thing I didn't miss is your kind and compassionate heart JLW. By transcribing Susan Oliver's video, we didn't have to listen to her ourselves. For that, I am deeply grateful. 🙏🙏🙏