So… now we have a new precedent where vaccine and drug studies are “completed” without control group. “Follow the science" and "speed of science" means skipping the scientific process??? OK. This is science?? And if we are “following the science,” then why did former CDC director Robert Redfield receive death threats after coming to thin…
So… now we have a new precedent where vaccine and drug studies are “completed” without control group. “Follow the science" and "speed of science" means skipping the scientific process??? OK. This is science?? And if we are “following the science,” then why did former CDC director Robert Redfield receive death threats after coming to think the virus came out of a lab, not zoonotic See DailyMail, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9649771/Ex-CDC-director-received-death-threats-said-believed-COVID-19-originated-lab.html Fox, or the UK’s Sun (most of the bought and paid for US fake news ignored this, of course.) Why did Redfield also tell Vanity Fair “I was threatened and ostracized because I proposed another hypothesis… I expected it from politicians. I didn’t expect if from science.” (Maybe he should have reviewed Thomas Kuhn’s seminal Structure of Scientific Revolution.)
This reminds me of a global warming skeptic out of Univ. of Winnipeg, the late Dr. Tim Ball who received hate mail and death threat, like Redfield, with such messages as, "If you continue to speak out, you won't live to see further global warming…" Both faux global warming and Covid research is supposed to be about "science." Really? Writes Ball: *****"It's hard to imagine Niels Bohr responding to Albert Einstein's letter questioning quantum mechanics with a statement like: ‘If you continue to speak out, you won't live to see further quantum mechanics...’" and then added it is “Only a false religion needs hate mail, threats, courts of inquisition and Hollywood movies to sustain it.”
So… now we have a new precedent where vaccine and drug studies are “completed” without control group. “Follow the science" and "speed of science" means skipping the scientific process??? OK. This is science?? And if we are “following the science,” then why did former CDC director Robert Redfield receive death threats after coming to think the virus came out of a lab, not zoonotic See DailyMail, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9649771/Ex-CDC-director-received-death-threats-said-believed-COVID-19-originated-lab.html Fox, or the UK’s Sun (most of the bought and paid for US fake news ignored this, of course.) Why did Redfield also tell Vanity Fair “I was threatened and ostracized because I proposed another hypothesis… I expected it from politicians. I didn’t expect if from science.” (Maybe he should have reviewed Thomas Kuhn’s seminal Structure of Scientific Revolution.)
This reminds me of a global warming skeptic out of Univ. of Winnipeg, the late Dr. Tim Ball who received hate mail and death threat, like Redfield, with such messages as, "If you continue to speak out, you won't live to see further global warming…" Both faux global warming and Covid research is supposed to be about "science." Really? Writes Ball: *****"It's hard to imagine Niels Bohr responding to Albert Einstein's letter questioning quantum mechanics with a statement like: ‘If you continue to speak out, you won't live to see further quantum mechanics...’" and then added it is “Only a false religion needs hate mail, threats, courts of inquisition and Hollywood movies to sustain it.”