As FDA works with Pfizer/Moderna to Find Excuses to Approve of COVID-19 Vaccines for Kids Under 5 (An Impossible Task) we are about to be peppered with distracting news stories designed to distract
"Students in my Immunology course have created a visually stunning, fact-filled fact sheet showing that antibodies do not tell the entire story of our immune response to COVID-19 or to COVID-19 vaccines."
Can you publish the fact sheet here or at the IPAK website? Information like that needs to be shared widely....
There are a few reasons why there is this distraction.
Primaries begin today and they're trying to avoid a Wipeout in the house and Senate.
2000 Mules just premiered yesterday and it gives incontrovertible proof that they're was a stolen election to the degree that Biden should not be president with the lost electoral votes. #2000mules
Ukraine is becoming a failed policy direction with more scrutiny of the money we keep sending over and it's disappearing and Russia is gaining ground. (Pelosi and Schiff made a personal visit, and they are amongst the most crooked.)
Exactly right. People need to understand that their attention and emotions are being manipulated. The SCOTUS "leak" timing is incredibly suspicious, given that this survey and opinion was written probably weeks, maybe months, ago.
Right. If our blood contained all the antibodies from our previous infections, we'd be dead because our blood would be a useless protein sludge.
I never got how counting antibodies from vaccine targeting a functionally extinct virus variant was proof of anything relevant.
Moreover, if the immune system is working, it will create memory T & B cells. You will be able to quickly generate what you need. No matter. I recently "lost" this argument with a family member who had 2 shots, a booster, got Covid and recovered and hence has robust natural immunity, but now insists on getting boosted for an upcoming trip to keep his antibody levels up.
Extended quote: "recent research from the Karolinska Institute in Sweden showed that several COVID patients with mild to no symptoms had generated T cells against the virus. This was even the case in patients who had no detectable levels of antibodies against the virus. ....
How long antibodies stick around for varies from one pathogen to another. ...
... antibodies to COVID may not last very long. But this does not exclude the existence of memory T and B cells, capable of re-emerging from their dormant states to protect against re-infection. In other words, the antibodies that B cells make during initial exposure disappear in a few weeks, but the memory cells generated as a consequence of this persist for much longer."
But when it comes to family members, I am just letting go and giving up. Covid will be around for at least as long as our species. But since Omicron onwards the mortality risk has been greatly reduced. If adults want to keep getting boosted, go ahead. Pathogen prime yourself. But, no, we should not be imposing this madness on children.
That's pathogenic priming, yes. But I am not aware that if you get it and recover, you don't develop the B& T cells. Have not seen the literature indicating otherwise. As for for why someone would keep mRNA boosting, again: no idea. Why stress your system if you do not need to? And generally, people who have natural (recovered) immunity have more polyvariant protection. Because the entire virus doesn't (naturally) mutate everywhere. So why trade that -- attempt to reprogram that --for a more limited response to a functionally extinct variant? Again, no idea. Fauci & the myth of antibody levels as vaccine success.
The following paper is way above my pay grade, but is what led me to believe that getting COVID post vaccination might not lead to robust immunity due to impaired immune system functionality, including that of B and T cells:
Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs
Thank you. Your point might well be correct. I will browse the article. That said, I am not sure the solution -- and I am NOT saying you are advocating this -- would be yet another mRNA vax-boost for an expired variant, further screwing up your system. If you've already beaten it, and the current variants have considerably risk for mortality, then why boost? Trust your body to beat down now what is for the vast majority of the population a common cold. I don't get it.
Dollars to Donuts it will be approved because the FDA is captured, but remember.... it is this process of approving an injection that does not work and is replete with untoward reactions that will ultimately be their down-fall.
They've been KILLING KIDS with Remdesivir - in order to elevate the death counts in the cohort that they're targeting. If you create the false appearance of a danger, and then create the false appearance of some "benefit" - and simultaneously act, to fraudulently hide the evidence of risks/injuries/deaths from the jabs... You can fraudulently make the case fir authorization/approval/mandates - and circumventing the product liability once actually "approved".
Notice the timing, on the authorization for Remdesivir, for babies. Notice that they're getting it at twice the doses, as calculated by body weight. Notice the lack of any study, that justifies its use in ANYONE, ever, for any purpose.
"Students in my Immunology course have created a visually stunning, fact-filled fact sheet showing that antibodies do not tell the entire story of our immune response to COVID-19 or to COVID-19 vaccines."
Can you publish the fact sheet here or at the IPAK website? Information like that needs to be shared widely....
exactly. why mention it at all?
It is being reviewed.
Thanks for helping us all keep our heads straight on this, amidst the distractions. Good read and reminders.
Molehills to ignore...
critical race theory
gender fluid
national election fraud (the states still matter)
early treatment
Mountains to focus on...
Pandemic responses to eliminate freedom
Jan 6 "insurrection" = Reichtag fire
Drug approvals
WHO treaty
popular organized dissent (we need more)
The FDA, not FDA. I hate that crap. It's, The CIA, and The FBI, and The hospital.
Are we allowed to comment on The FDAs decision? Is there a public comment section?
There are a few reasons why there is this distraction.
Primaries begin today and they're trying to avoid a Wipeout in the house and Senate.
2000 Mules just premiered yesterday and it gives incontrovertible proof that they're was a stolen election to the degree that Biden should not be president with the lost electoral votes. #2000mules
Ukraine is becoming a failed policy direction with more scrutiny of the money we keep sending over and it's disappearing and Russia is gaining ground. (Pelosi and Schiff made a personal visit, and they are amongst the most crooked.)
Exactly right. People need to understand that their attention and emotions are being manipulated. The SCOTUS "leak" timing is incredibly suspicious, given that this survey and opinion was written probably weeks, maybe months, ago.
Yes ~ timing is everything.
Right. If our blood contained all the antibodies from our previous infections, we'd be dead because our blood would be a useless protein sludge.
I never got how counting antibodies from vaccine targeting a functionally extinct virus variant was proof of anything relevant.
Moreover, if the immune system is working, it will create memory T & B cells. You will be able to quickly generate what you need. No matter. I recently "lost" this argument with a family member who had 2 shots, a booster, got Covid and recovered and hence has robust natural immunity, but now insists on getting boosted for an upcoming trip to keep his antibody levels up.
A decent discussion here from 2020, prior to Omicron variant(s) and all the confirmatory data about natural immunity: https://theconversation.com/coronavirus-b-cells-and-t-cells-explained-141888
Extended quote: "recent research from the Karolinska Institute in Sweden showed that several COVID patients with mild to no symptoms had generated T cells against the virus. This was even the case in patients who had no detectable levels of antibodies against the virus. ....
How long antibodies stick around for varies from one pathogen to another. ...
... antibodies to COVID may not last very long. But this does not exclude the existence of memory T and B cells, capable of re-emerging from their dormant states to protect against re-infection. In other words, the antibodies that B cells make during initial exposure disappear in a few weeks, but the memory cells generated as a consequence of this persist for much longer."
But when it comes to family members, I am just letting go and giving up. Covid will be around for at least as long as our species. But since Omicron onwards the mortality risk has been greatly reduced. If adults want to keep getting boosted, go ahead. Pathogen prime yourself. But, no, we should not be imposing this madness on children.
"a family member who had 2 shots, a booster, got Covid and recovered and hence has robust natural immunity"
Is that really a given? I've been seeing a lot of articles that contend the more mRNA shots you get, the more you mess up your innate immune system.
That's pathogenic priming, yes. But I am not aware that if you get it and recover, you don't develop the B& T cells. Have not seen the literature indicating otherwise. As for for why someone would keep mRNA boosting, again: no idea. Why stress your system if you do not need to? And generally, people who have natural (recovered) immunity have more polyvariant protection. Because the entire virus doesn't (naturally) mutate everywhere. So why trade that -- attempt to reprogram that --for a more limited response to a functionally extinct variant? Again, no idea. Fauci & the myth of antibody levels as vaccine success.
The following paper is way above my pay grade, but is what led me to believe that getting COVID post vaccination might not lead to robust immunity due to impaired immune system functionality, including that of B and T cells:
Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X
Thank you. Your point might well be correct. I will browse the article. That said, I am not sure the solution -- and I am NOT saying you are advocating this -- would be yet another mRNA vax-boost for an expired variant, further screwing up your system. If you've already beaten it, and the current variants have considerably risk for mortality, then why boost? Trust your body to beat down now what is for the vast majority of the population a common cold. I don't get it.
I'm with you 100%; these shots need to stop.
FDA = Fraudulent Disseminators of Anti-science
NIH = Never Investigate Honestly
CDC = Corrupt Data Cookers
Can lowly commoners view this fact sheet? Oh, Norway banned vaccines for kids.
Yes, thank you! There will be a lot of distractions and we will stay focused! 🧐
Dollars to Donuts it will be approved because the FDA is captured, but remember.... it is this process of approving an injection that does not work and is replete with untoward reactions that will ultimately be their down-fall.
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/remdesivir
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/is-veklury-remdesivir-safe-is-it
They've been KILLING KIDS with Remdesivir - in order to elevate the death counts in the cohort that they're targeting. If you create the false appearance of a danger, and then create the false appearance of some "benefit" - and simultaneously act, to fraudulently hide the evidence of risks/injuries/deaths from the jabs... You can fraudulently make the case fir authorization/approval/mandates - and circumventing the product liability once actually "approved".
Notice the timing, on the authorization for Remdesivir, for babies. Notice that they're getting it at twice the doses, as calculated by body weight. Notice the lack of any study, that justifies its use in ANYONE, ever, for any purpose.