The Great Reset is Underway - But It's Not Quite The One That Klaus & The Globalists Wanted
CDC Admits Vaccines Do Not Stop Transmission. Public Health Experts Say Herd Immunity is Now Impossible. SCOTUS canned Mandates via OSHA. So... What Are the Reasonable Policy Options? Are There Any?
With each passing day, the knowledge of the poverty of the vaccine-only response to COVID-19 increasingly becomes part of the widely adopted knowledge base of ordinary American citizens and an increasing proportion of health care personnel.
The factors at play have included the failure of the vaccination program - both its failure in terms of acceptance of the vaccines themselves by approximately 40% of the public and its adoption by healthcare professionals. Acceptance drops off further with adverse events from boosters, and even more due to the prospect of boosters every five months. The latter is product of numerous factors, including the fact that FDA voted against boosters for all, only to be ignored and overruled by CDC - as if a single person knows more than the FDA panel.
Three weeks ago, The World Health Organization announced their position: we cannot boost our way out of the pandemic: (See “We Cannot Boost Our Way Out of the Pandemic”), arguing instead that the available vaccines should be used on the unvaccinated, preferably (according to them) the unvaccinated in developing countries.
So, their position is yet another rare commodity gambit, one that has evidently also failed.
As far back as July 2021, some public health experts had communicated their doubts that herd immunity was unlikely (See NYTimes:Reaching ‘Herd Immunity’ Is Unlikely in the U.S., Experts Now Believe), but they argued vaccinating the vulnerable might be enough. By August, experts were reporting that herd immunity against Delta via vaccination was “Mythical”. (See: IBI Times: COVID-19 Herd Immunity Is 'Mythical' And Impossible To Achieve, UK Vaccine Expert Says) and yet US politicians were still pushing for mandates on the basis of “protecting others.”
Over the boosting period of the COVID-19 vaccination program attempt, CDC keeps telling the fully vaccinated that they are no longer vaccinated. First it was two doses, then it was three, and now it might be four. This is a far cry from the news that the vaccinated public expected to hear when they were told that the vaccine was the only way out of the pandemic.
Instead, the vaccinated have learned that they can still become infected, they can still get sick, they can still be hospitalized, and they can still die from COVID-19. And they were not - and are not happy.
The official narrative started to unravel when the July 2021 data from Barnstable County, Massachusetts were published by the CDC showing that 74% of cases were in the vaccinated. The counterpoint that there should be more cases because that area was so liberal failed to explain why indeed there were any cases in the vaccinated. The fact that 74% of the people in the county who were given COVID-19 diagnoses betrayed the fact that the vaccine was not capable of preventing COVID-19; mathematically, it meant that there were more cases in the vaccinated than in the unvaccinated. When considered in light of vaccine uptake, these rates led to calculations that showed negative efficacy.
The public was not told this by official channels, but they were told that the vaccinated should go back to masking, about a week after being set “free” from masking by CDC. This whip-lash reversal opened a lot of eyes and created healthy skepticism in a large number of people who previously had been pushing the official “vaccinate or die” narrative.
Data from the Israel Ministry of Health, COVID-19 data, from Oct. 4, 2021 had already shown that the vaccinated were more likely to have COVID-19. Data had also already been published that showed that countries that had higher vaccination rates also had higher COVID-19 cases.
Now, we see from Scotland higher cases in the vaccinated
and we see in Ontario, the majority of hospitalizations are in the vaccinated (data as of 1/15/2022; again, per the hype, there should be close to zero):
The Biden administration has taken to meeting directly with vaccine manufacturers, cutting out the regulatory agencies altogether. It’s no surprise then that the Biden administration had tried to exert their will to deny informed consent and freedom of choice with an OSHA equivalent of “no-jab, no-pay,” and they lost that bid due to their overreach of power and misplaced administrative duties. SCOTUS did not buy that the unvaccinated represented any more of a threat to anyone at work than the vaccinated; if they had, their ruling would likely have not been by such a wide majority.
The ruling itself includes innumerable clear example of disinformation from individuals in the highest levels of office; it cites HHS Secretary Becerra as follows:
“In addition to the threat posed by in- facility transmission itself, the Secretary also found that “fear of exposure” to the virus “from unvaccinated health care staff can lead patients to themselves forgo seeking medically necessary care,” creating a further “ris[k] to patient health and safety.”Id., at 61588. He further noted that staffing shortages caused by COVID–19-related exposures or illness has disrupted patient care. Id.,at61559.”
The disingenuous distortion of reality relayed by Beccara, whom SCOTUS should be able to count on for information, smacks the public in the face and is an affront to logic and reason given even as SCOTUS was deliberating, it was announced that sick and COVID-19 positive healthcare workers are to be used to fill the gap left by fired, unvaccinated healthcare workers.
Becerra, of course, left out that many healthcare workers have been forced out due to vaccine mandates, as they have become aware of the massive rates of vaccine adverse events, including deaths, following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (See Rose, 2021). Many others have left due to ethical medical practices that have included denying patients early, effective treatments for COVID-19, and mis-coding non-COVID-19 patients as “COVID” to increase reimbursements. Some have left due to personal knowledge of vaccinated patients being hospitalized but coded as “unvaccinated;” others know of instances of patients being allowed to die for no reason. These health care professionals have left allopathic medicine permanently - and are creating a new field of medicine called “Ethical Medicine.” Many have joined naturopathic or chiropractic medical practices; others are establishing their own practices or medical co-operatives.
Legacy media outlets have lost the public’s trust; CNN has lost 90% of its viewership. Meanwhile, podcast hosts such Joe Rogan have provided ample bandwidth to objective medical professionals such as Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Pierre Kory to help educate the public on the balance of information available on matters that impacts their understanding of COVID-19 as a disease, COVID-19 treatments, and COVID-19 vaccines.
Public health experts are now divided between the strategy of sticking with the vaccine-only narrative and admitting the futility of the approach - at least as prescribed by the most ardent vaccine advocates. They are also divided on the question of boosting children: those who stand to profit the most from vaccine uptake are now making “warnings” and “recommendations,” not content to wait for CDC to adopt their position - all the while undermining confidence in their products.
The reliance and use of so-called “Fact Checker” opinion websites that attempt to “debunk” readily available public data, as easily accessed as those above, causes even further loss of trust in “the system.” Time and again, their foolish articles have been disproven, and they look increasingly insipid when CDC follows their fact-checking with admissions (such as over-reporting cases and deaths, for one, and more cases in the vaccinated, for another). Why are these “Fact Checker” organizations not submitting their work to journals for peer-review? Do they have a monopoly on the truth?
The answer is in: clearly not.
Just as I sternly admonished, in 2020, anyone of either party who dared to politicize public health, and castigated those who have made our wellness a commodity, I want at this moment and caution against an over-reaction. Unlawful backlash against the wrong doers is unworthy of American citizens.
I advise the wise, ethical and objective use of law, including criminal and civil courts, and let fortune determine the fate of those guilty of wrong-doing.
Cool heads are prevailing in the battle to free medicine from the clutches of the “prevention” paradigm that took root in the CDC decades ago. Fauci is now increasingly seen as a petty tyrant. Like all tyrants, Fauci will fall due to the fatal flaw common to all tyrants: He drank his own kool-aid and believed in his own power. Only a fool believes in his own power.
Where Do We Go From Here?
We will have to remake society without prevention as the primary goal of public health. Tools like bubble vaccination should finally be given their time. And the use of medicines of all types that will allow immunity but prevent illness - the Goldilocks zone of infection - will have to be given priority. We know that mass vaccination is associated with the rise of chronic illness - and now we know better as to why: viral proteins cause both acute and chronic illness. We’ll need to revisit the use of aluminum in vaccines altogether - and seek ways to produce immunity for those who want it in ways that do not involve the cost of disease burden due to pathogenic priming.
Similarly, we’ll have to move Environmentalism from its focus on climate change and global warming to the mass reduction in the production and use and release of environmental toxins in our air, food, water and commercial products - in large part, I’m afraid due to the massive exposure to pathogenic medical products that contribute to chronic illnesses.
I’m reluctant to write this, but I am nevertheless hopeful that perhaps the gift of COVID-19 will be a Great Reset of public health and infectious disease medicine altogether.
I’ve made a formal proposal for a Great Reset of public health called Plan B, and I invite the public and all professionals to examine it and consider its adoption. I do not seek to lead the new initiative, once established. There are other fish to fry, and I’d rather apply my problem-solving skills to other factors that are impairing the wellness of humans and the planet.
Lyons-Weiler, J. 2020. Plan B Public Health Infrastructure and Operations Oversight Reform for America. The International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research. https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/19
Jessica Rose, 2021. Critical appraisal of VAERS Pharmacovigilance: Is the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) a functioning pharmacovigilance system? Sci, Publ Health Pol & Law 3:100-129 (Independently Peer-Reviewed (Single-Blind, 2 reviewers) https://www.publichealthpolicyjournal.com/general-5