15 Comments

get a grip doc ... these are not vaccines, and were never intended to be vaccines. awake up ... it is 3 years already, still dont get it ???

Expand full comment

https://www.comusav.com/en/bluetruth/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Pandellis: True that! These 40 minutes confirm the WHO portion regarding "ZOMBIES"

James this will clarify...

Plan of action is the key...

Expand full comment
Nov 22, 2022Liked by James Lyons-Weiler

RCTs ended way too early

RCTs depended not only on the two week definition but on adjudication of who should be tested and how to interpret these results. without that level of detail it is only a black box

Expand full comment

This is become unadulterated pantomime farce sounding very much like an insane quibble over the efficacy of Zyklon B, now adroitly described below as a, "go-nowhere semantic issue."

The data cut off for the Pfizer efficacy trial was a laughable 2 mo (NEJM Dec 2020). The controls were abolished after EUA. No mention of ARR or OR or NNV added further to the unbridled nonsense.

The unethical, unscientific coerced PROMOTION and MANDATE of unpredictable, unsafe and ineffective greed became théâtre noire bolstered and cheered by psy-ops, politicians, WEF, national policies and the utter nonsense of lateral flow/RT-PCR 'cases', coupled to the absolute absence of clarity around hospitalisation and COD with/of or whatever it was that they did or didn't do with killers like remdesivir and ventilators and the denial of off-label treatment.

As you know, negative risk benefit (Fraiman et al. 2022), and NNV of 217, "Dagan and colleagues (cited by Olliaro et al.) report an RRR of 94%, which is essentially the same as the RRR of the phase 3 trial (95%) but with an ARR of 0·46%, which translates into an NNV of 217 (when the ARR was 0·84% and the NNV was 119 in the phase 3 trial)."

(Olliaro, Torreele, & Vaillant TheLancet Microbe Vol 2 July 2021; Outcome reporting bias - Catalog of Bias https://catalogofbias.org/biases/outcome-reporting-bias/; Schechtman, Volume 5 • Number 5 • 2002 VA L U E I N H E A LT H Odds Ratio, Relative Risk, Absolute Risk Reduction, and the Number Needed to Treat—Which of These Should We Use?).

The issue is just what are we going to DO to resist and reject the efforts to install the mRNA "platform" (see for example, Access to COVID-19 Tools  Accelerator https://www.act-a.org/) and its 100 day woe to go intent, coupled to a new world regressive ethics (ladder of coercion) to withdraw access to medical treatment and deny access to groceries if you one does not go quietly into the night (eg. New Zealand)?

... all rather a "go-nowhere semantic issue" I know, but there it is.

Expand full comment
Nov 22, 2022·edited Nov 22, 2022Liked by James Lyons-Weiler

Cease all general vaccination except therapeutic. We don't need the allergies, autoimmunities, immune disregulation, and whatever else they cause.

Yeah, PlanB for NIH/CDC/FDA - abort their officers, whatever age they may be. As DrLatusDextro suggests, Zyklon B may be better (diatomaceous earth component may be counterproductive); levonorgestrel only works for a very short period.

Expand full comment

Dear James

In 2018 a British scientist was knighted for his work relating to childhood leukemia.

He found a mutation that impacts one in twenty children and that if those children were not properly exposed to sufficient bacteria and viruses in their first year of life they would likely go on to develop leukemia.

Of course two years later governments locked people down and used terror propaganda to get them to sanitise everything relentlessly.

I hope you will help expose this particularly egregious scandal.

How many infants have they condemned to death?

‘For 30 years I’ve been obsessed by why children get leukaemia. Now we have an answer’

This article is more than 3 years old

Newly knighted cancer scientist Mel Greaves explains why a cocktail of microbes could give protection against disease

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/dec/30/children-leukaemia-mel-greaves-microbes-protection-against-disease

Expand full comment

Thank you thought it pertinent to share, since it appears legit. Perhaps enough of pointing fingers and help those who are alert in forming actions, ideas?

Otherwise many may be directionless…

Like me.

So tired of it we GET it, it’s bad stuff…

What it the Purpose of it…got it

What’s next?

Prep?

I live in the city…

A gun and rice…

Dystopian lifestyle… mnnn not really worth fighting for…

Many like me are alert.. what to do?

Expand full comment

How can something that kills and maims so many have ANY positive efficacy rate? Recovered from Covid but dead from the jab! Yay!

Expand full comment

One should think that, non-brainwashed God fearing folks would never be conned & suckered by the *5 Billion in fraud fines, AND the **leading cause of Death (That kills 600 people a day) i.e. our evil for profit Big Pharma "medicine." BUT when suckers have no God to believe in they can be made to believe anything! Right? I.E. "The vax jab is safe & effective! (Especially If?) You can consider Big Pharma's 400 million kill/ patented, gain of function/ SARS & SARS 2 Co-v 19's money maker?) Then you'd know how Godless life in Nazi Germany or Commie China was like! (All coming soon to the USA!) God help us! [*Google, Big Pharma big fines] [**see, Death by Medicine by Dr. Null!] The life you save [here & the afterlife] may be yours

Expand full comment