61 Comments

How is this any different from Nazi doctors saying: "Sorry, I didn't know. I've seen new evidence. Now I'm on your side. Let me help you." ?

https://twitter.com/B33Mello/status/1608570760125349889

Expand full comment

I agree with you accountability is needed. What about focusing that for the policy makers, controllers, censors working for various government agencies colluding with pharma folks to hide the facts from people all over the world? It seems if we tear down every MD who comes around late (and I agree it’s late) then it does nothing to wake more people from their slumber. What we need I think we would agree on (based on your twitter thread which asks important questions and raises important issues) is more awake humans who won’t allow for such control and top down censorship to happen and for that we need all the voices we can get. Thanks for pushing at this. It’s important and it calls us all out for being accountable.

Expand full comment

Excellent thread. 👍🏽💕 Thanks for bringing up these important points.

Expand full comment

Good, but fairly tardy seen from another perspective...

Expand full comment

Took him long enough, and still only pink-pilled. He will do much penance and like the rest of them, no more than he deserves.

Expand full comment

The precautionary principle was not applied. This is what I do not understand.

Expand full comment

My brother is a doctor, a specialist in the area of heart transplant in the USA. To date he has taken at least five Vax shots, but had the Wuhan China Covid Virus twice. His first case was early on before the government conspired with the big Pharma companies in their unholy alliance, but at the beginning of the US Government's full on censorship campaign against the free flow of information. The second was during the Delta variant and he was "fully vaccinated" (I hate that term). I think he bought into the lies, but one wonders how much this expands his trade. I'm not saying that is why he took the shots, but perhaps he should not have remained silent against their effects.

Expand full comment

If he’s a cardiac surgeon, he’s going to continue to see damage - in one young patient after another- for some time, right? At some point, I would think that the evidence for harm from the clot shot would overwhelm his cognitive dissonance. Please keep us Substackers informed of his changes; I’ll bet that it will be representative of many in this medical profession, and useful (hope-inspiring?) for us to know. Thanks!

Expand full comment

people just cant believe it and will continue to deny it. these guys have doing this stuff for centuries and know very well what they are doing. not easy.

Expand full comment

Yeah, you’re right, it’s not easy. The physician would have to acknowledge that much of his entire profession is doing serious harm, even evil! He may then *need* to quit his profession, and he’s likely to resist that move for a long, long time. That’s why I’d like to be informed of changes - is there hope?

Expand full comment

I met up with my brother on Sunday afternoon and at some point asked him about what he thought about sudden death syndrome. He said that there is always a certain number of people that suddenly die in all age categories and that number is unchanged at least in Michigan. I of course did not have any data with which to challenge him but it sure seems like a lot of young, athletic people are dying.

Expand full comment

Thank you once again, Dr. Jack, for publicly warning of the dangers involved with this new “therapy” in 2020. There really is no excuse for our current manipulated situation.

Expand full comment

I understand why people are angry because it took him so long, but these are exactly the voices we need to bring to our side and welcome them when they do!

Expand full comment

Too little, too late.

Expand full comment

John Campbell is obviously sweating it. Having started as a true believer (stupid), he has gone a long way due to his being able to keep an open mind (not stupid). Few people can be defined in pure terms of the black and white. What you say is true, but he is better than others, and his turnaround should have an impact especially on his followers. Which is what counts, really.

Expand full comment

I can only hope that John Campbell and others pursue this new found scepticism and the whole rotten, corrupt pharma business is shown up in a similar way to the tobacco companies. It’s actually far, far worse than the tobacco companies. I have been waiting and hoping for people like yourself and Campbell will recognise the dangers of statins, the unnecessary expense of insulin (and the harm of recombinant dna in modern insulins), synthetic hormones and so many other chemical used on our populations to make profit.

Expand full comment

And then apply that scepticism to all other harmful industries like chemical/pesticides, telecommunications, genetic engineering, weather engineering, big agriculture, finance, & finally the legal framework/system.

Expand full comment

That is exactly where I find myself. Particularly with respect to 5G. It’s a mess.

Expand full comment

Keep in mind technology can be used wisely, or abused.

Question is why has it been negatively deployed in practically all of the modern western world.

Expand full comment

So. He finally sees the obvious. He sees at almost three years in what how many of us without all the fancy "science" degrees saw out of the gate?? Because we can read. Or because we listen to our guts. Or because like Dollyboy points out simply adhere to the precautionary principle.

As for red pills, I'd say more like humble pie. A truly red pilled person throws it all up in the air. 𝑨𝒍𝒍 𝒐𝒇 𝒊𝒕. This guy is merely acknowledging the obvious -- the obvious that was obvious more than two years ago.

Shall we ask the question how many are injured or dead because of Campbell and so many like him? And the best he can muster is a "pause?" On just this injectable junk?

Is he having a little trouble putting his head on the pillow?

Expand full comment

Agreed. What these people don’t seem to realise is that this corrupt business model (benefitting medics, academics, pharma) has been making us increasingly chronically ill for decades. They all got away with it and so it is probably normalised. A great example of a slippery slope and now they are damaging millions or even billions because they always got away with it. They have known that they will have to pay out compensation for various drugs, but that cost is built into their business plan so they always survive. The tobacco companies do the same. Ever wondered how the tobacco companies survived those huge fines? Because they saved up for them.

Expand full comment

Ironically, nicotine is now claimed to be helpful in fighting off covid-1984 (S1 vs. ACE-2 receptors). So, the odd smoke for health´s sake ... Of course, nicotine is not all the Big Tobacco would deliver in their products.

Expand full comment

It might also be helpful for Parkinson’s disease

Expand full comment

I give you kudos for continuing to watch Dr. Campbell. I could stand about 3 minutes of his videos when they first started popping up in my feed back in the early days of the coof. He was pushing the masks, even on the little kiddos. I simply could not tolerate that level of stupidity from a "doctor". I tried, a number of times, maybe the first 8 or ten videos I just couldnt deal with his "science" and "charts" and white board gymnastics. I think he is allowed to publish because he is working for "them" and doesn't even know it himself.

Expand full comment

I can nderstand some people thinking this took too long. But, I would like to offer some outside perspective (that of a PhD scientist but not in bilology, more like physics). I know so few people in my field who are willing to question the official narrative around covid or the PCR scandal of too high CT, or the “safe and effective” narrative, that it does not surprise me at all that doctors are having the hardest time questioning or reversing course. To admit the shots are damaging and killing people is a huge admission and yes it should be done by anyone who sees it, but I can see how people herd along. Milgram experiment showed us that only about 1 in 5 (I think, can’t remember for sure) was able to stop shocking people while the “white coat” told them to go on with it. This is playing out today. So it’s huge kudos from me to ANYONE who can admit error and come into the side of at least questioning - it is another voice against the propagandistic media poisoning people against their own health and well being.

Expand full comment

Agreed. However we would be naive to think this can be blamed on the media. Society will eventually realise that the media is funded by TPTB and to stay healthy and safe we are going to have to start taking responsibility for our decisions, both as individuals and professionals.

Expand full comment

Absolutely also agreed - don’t mean to blame the media as much as the human psychology resulting from decades of a certain form of “education”. I agree with you 100% we all need to step up and take personal responsibility for sure. Health and well being, professionally, and in our local communities. Cheers to a better 2023!

Expand full comment

A very wise comment. Thanks.

Expand full comment

he is a good man.

Expand full comment

John is old school. At first he assumed that everyone involved had his own level of integrity and wanted the best outcome. Fairly soon he realized that effective early treatment with repurposed drugs was being suppressed, but he still assumed that the "vaccines" were what they were represented to be, and supported their use since there was little alternative. It wasn't long before he realized it was a money-making operation and that the "health" authorities were corrupt.

He has communicated information on covid to his audience as it has come in, and has himself been educated in the process. He has been disillusioned for quite some time, and bitter about the censorship he has had to skirt around, getting round the latter by telling viewers what he can't say and quoting YouTube's own ridiculous rules.

I found his approach frustrating at first, but I've never doubted his sincerity. The insults thrown at him are mean-spirited and unjustified.

Expand full comment

The problem with his shibboleth of a vax is, at its core, one of arithmetic: By April. 2020, and having performed just cursory calculations every now and then, based on official (!) open source figures, I had come to the conclusion that in case of covid-1984, the risk of fatality was about one quarter of a percent (.25%). Therefore, there was no need, let alone justification for a vax, and neither was there a deadly pandemic.

Why did John Campbell not arrive at the same conclusion? Was he unable to count?

Expand full comment

You'd have to ask him, but he's a nurse instructor, not a statistician. Actually your number seems rather high. If 8 billion people are infected, a fatality rate of .25% would mean 20 million deaths. Not exactly trivial.

Expand full comment

I see Dr. Campbell as a good man who could not envisage the evil around him. The thing that I have learned in the Covid era is that those who are awake got their at different speeds and times and under very different circumstances and that being judgemental about this is not helpful to anyone.

I think those who truly felt they were being helpful will in fact suffer the most when they realize they have been lied to and have contributed to the spread of the lies. Those who suspected and still contributed to the spread are a different story. I think Dr. Campbell also was doing the best he could to be truthful without getting a warning from YouTube, which is regrettable. Far better if he had moved to BitChute or one of the other platforms. His transformation gives me hope that many more of the ardent supporters of "THE SCIENCE" may also come to see the truth.

Expand full comment
Jan 2, 2023·edited Jan 2, 2023

I can’t seem to decide how I feel about Dr. Campbell’s progression. On the one hand, I am profoundly grateful that he issued an “official” call to stop the vax campaign. On the other hand, I had long stopped watching his videos because he was under the spell. I’m “just a mom,” but as LNP mRNA tech was first described, my brain INSTANTLY threw back 2 questions: “How would it stay in the deltoid?” and “What is the ‘off switch’ for my cells to stop making spike protein?”

No one in the mainstream gave plausible answers to those questions - heck, the vast majority weren’t even remotely ASKING questions. Then we got trickles of data such as the Japanese mice where LNPs clearly accumulated in ovarian tissue. …and whispers of pseudo-uridine substitution, helpfing the synthetic mRNA last longer. From a basic common-sense standpoint, none of this EVER sounded like a good idea.

Expand full comment