Ignoring the Lab-Leak Hypothesis Undermines Science and Public Health. Of Course Individual Scientists Working on Pathogens Must be Held Accountable with Oversight to Discourage Lab Leak Pandemics
The problem with Lab Leak is that there is NO biology that supports RNA fidelity to pandemic. While CRISPR keyboard gene jockeys can make synthetic clones of consensus sequences & grow those in vials or vats as pure RNA they do NOT change the rules of Mother Nature.
Gain of Function is badly named gain of Vision because RNA molecules can NOT be swabbed from a human or bat ass and grown only synthetic clones that are basis for ALL virology & vacciniology. To compare the clones to reality is as silly as saying highly enriched uranium is the same as raw earth minerals. Impossible ridiculous conflation of reality.
Read 1,200 page 2016 NIH funded GoF review & search for "however" where each section summary notes petrie dish models do not reflect "wild type virus" nor consider human immune systems. The big danger is liars with invisible enemy & spread of fear w bad ideas.
GoF is the method to make vaccines weaponized to be some Nature changing power. pffft!
I used to think that there were only 2 possibilities: 1)spillover from the Wet market or the bat Cave--VERSUS 2)lab leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. But then I read a 3rd possibility: intentional release from the WIOV. I.e., that authorities WANTED a coronavirus pandemic so that a virus was actually released, not leaked. It took me a long time to understand that this was different from a lab leak. I think I heard this idea from an interview with David Martin on Del Bigtree "The High Wire."
I think that the point is that GOF should not be justified by fear of contagion from animals. It is rare that animals provide a threat of transmitting deadly bacteria or viruses. Some insect vectors--such as mosquitoes spreading malaria--are, however, the exception.
Diana, i believe as well it was intentional but I don't believe it released from the lab but rather strategically released across the globe in various areas. I think this was an intentional experiment to see how the masses would respond.
I think I agree with you. that Covid 19 broke out simultaneously many different places. Yet I never thought about intentional release. The propaganda refused to consider lab leak because they refuse to admit that GOF can be more deadly than nature. Also, if Covid 19 came from bats--then we all need to support WHO and the loyal virologists in their labs busy working on how to predict the next spillover, how to imagine it (or make it) even more deadly--and then develop vaccines at warp speed so that nobody has to get hospitalized or die from this horrible threat from the deadly bat caves. It couldn't possibly be associated with GOF. No. Everything's fine. Keep guarding the wet markets, pay no attention to the many many labs performing GOF research.
ofcourse, the Stadium of Inter in Milan where the 1st West world outbreak happened, is owned by Chinese!!! do the math! 0. releas was military games 2019 in China!! Hence COVID 19!!
I was reported to the director of the office I was working in by a med student who apparently was SHOCKED that I would posit that the virus was sprinkled on NY and California.
Also PhD Andrew Huff who was a VP at EcoHealth has blown the whistle but Congress ignores him. He states that the virus tech was transferred to China from DoD.
Andrew Huff is a whistleblower like pigs can fly.. the rediculous tale of shootout w FBI as close to movie of the week fiction as ever told. Having followed true whistleblowers from original 2010 war on WikiLeaks there is NOTHING that real whistleblowers endure that applies to Huff.. dude has everything but CIA cuff links & excels in selling lies.
"Scientists", like physicians today, are OWNED by their employers (government or corporations). They do what they are told (paid!) to do and that is determined by whoever controls their job/paycheck.
"A growing body of circumstantial evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 may have been artificially enhanced to increase its transmissibility in humans."
I'm not a scientist, but how can Ralph Baric's papers announcing his creation of enhanced viruses, and the means of producing many more, be considered "circumstantial evidence"?
The problem is that GoF models apply only to petrie dish clones used to create vaccines.. they do not change the laws of biology where RNA molecules do not have fidelity to pandemic they cannot even be cultured and grown from samples in the wild.. it's a giant fraud w invisible enemy as close to highly enriched uranium potency applied to all the raw earth minerals.
Also note mono-cultures & identical sequence exists nowhere in Nature & claims of finding identical sequences is possible only from same batch of clones.. once these molecules are let loose in the air they have none of the high purity high concentration of lab models.
YES Done on purpose to pay back their Stockholders 2004 !!! Billions and Billions for the Companies and Stockholders Wake Up People!!! Raise our Vibration out of Duality Conquer and Divide into Letting Go Of Being A Victim To Others Not Easy But I Feel The Only Way out or Hunger Games Here We Come!!!
The immediate and vociferous denial of a scientifically plausible theory was enough to be confirmatory in my mind. Anti-science by definition. We’ve seen this type response way too often to be fooled. Trust in the scientific process and in medicine has been irreparably damaged.
Fun fact.. Bret's brother Eric is Peter Thiel/Palintir wing man & their dad the Godfather of patents for antibodies appointed by RFK but never mentioned in RFK Jr interview Bret kept on ice for 18mos before releasing.. shills for weaponized piles of money packaged as resistance... not an honest or insightful source.. follow the money!!
Initially I believed the lab leak theory but now I think this is unlikely. Denis Rancourt’s analysis confirms there was no deadly virus circulating the globe starting 2019. Steve Kirsch just interviewed first responders last week and they stated things were very quiet for them during the lockdown and volume of emergencies more than doubled as soon as the shots rolled out. I was thinking that focusing on lab leak vs. wet market in Wuhan might be set up as an intentional distraction for the public and those MDs leading the freedom movement. I recommend following Dr. David Martin on Odysee. He’s been analyzing the patents on SARS CoV2. Martin talks about Ralph Baric and his work at UNC Chapel Hill on GOF and making the spike protein to be cardio toxic. Martin talks about Baric developing a replication defective clone of the virus, meaning it can’t be transmitted, and getting poised, Baric’s words, for INTENTIONAL RELEASE. When Baric states intentional release he does not specify the route, will it be via aerosol or injection. Could it be the intentional release was via the jabs and the photos from Wuhan, masking and social distancing, was just part of the the operation to make us believe that there was a dangerous virus traveling around the globe. The shots are gene therapies involving LPNs and mRNA but you can also look at them as a man made synthetic virus. This was a massive psychological operation and many levels of deception were implemented including the fake PCR test which was designed to mislead people into believing some novel pathogen was circulating the globe. I now think the intentional release was delivered via injection which explains why people are more likely to get Covid the more shots they get.
Also mRNA jabs are TRANSFECTIONS decades old failed cancer & gene therapy and anyone who still refuses to say Transfection is misinformed or lying. Human immune systems NEVER tolerate foreign proteins even if those repair genetic defects.
I like the spirit and message behind the title and subtitle of this piece! And if we're to be intellectually honest and follow that spirit and message we wouldn't limit ourselves to just two possibilities of lab leak or zoonotic leap. We'd explore many hypotheses. Following the scientific method, of course. For public health. If that's the goal.
What if those investigating the origins of the COVID-19 virus were able to step outside of the binary mind box of lab leak vs natural origin theories? They might find another hypothesis lurks in plain sight. With ramifications that go much further, much deeper into the world vaccination theory, and risks revealing a much darker underbelly than most can fathom. Even worse than lab leak, Gain-of-Function or Dual Use research. Vaccines themselves as the point of origination. The annual flu vaccine for starters.
Take this information from pharmaceutical and health policymaker's official industry publications that may point us to the possibility that the 2019-2020 flu vaccine itself helped generate the perception that Covid was an exceptionally dangerous and infectious pathogen. The 2019-2020 flu jabs themselves may very well be responsible for the severe outcomes that were being experienced, either via direct injection or shedding from vaccines - that we know happens with the LAIV model that was standardized for use in the 2019-2020 version.
A scientist researching the origins would leave no stone unturned and wouldn't bet limited to two possibilities. A skilled scientific investigator on a relentless search for truth, no matter where it leads, would start digging around into what was actually in those 2019 flu jabs that could have precipitated the entire pandemic. Yes, we know that vaccines themselves shed. Fauci and the CDC eventually admitted that even about the mRNA COVID design. But especially the live-attenuated types that were used in the 2019-2020 flu season design. So one didn't need to receive the flu shot that year to have gotten very sick from it.
And the 2019 flu jab used a known severe H3N2 variant that was hotly debated about its inclusion in the quadrivalent because it was known to be very severe. Here's some interesting information that may help connect some dots when paired with the study found in the Substack link towards the end this comment. And don't miss the very bottom of this comment for the November, 2019 CNN piece, Fauci and his experiments with a new generation of vaccines, it's also very, very curious to consider with 20/20 hindsight. Given all that has transpired since the CNN piece takes on a very predictive appearance, similar to "priming" in psychological parlance:
- This publication describes a brand-new style of flu vaccine that came online for the 2019-2020 flu season. Mammalian cell-based instead of egg-based. Claims that it was studied for efficacy...but no mention of safety trials:
"A new cell-based seasonal influenza vaccine has been issued marketing approval by the European Commission and will be available for the 2019/2020 flu season.
Flucelvax® Tetra (Seqirus) is the first cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIVc) to be made available in Europe and is licensed for use in individuals aged nine years and older.
To date, there have been no randomised controlled trials comparing the efficacy of QIVc and standard egg-based quadrivalent vaccines (QIVe)"
“This real-world study, along with other emerging evidence, indicates that cell-based influenza vaccines may result in better influenza-related outcomes compared to standard egg-based vaccine options in some seasons"
"In the UK, the potential advantages of QIVc, which is cultured in mammalian cells rather than eggs"
“We are pleased to be bringing Flucelvax Tetra to the UK next season and have sufficient capacity at our cell-based manufacturing facility in the US to also ensure supply in September 2019"
- This article is interesting. It says that they added live-attenuated influenza vaccines to the schedule. It goes on to say that flu vaccines most definitely, positively, absolutely don't cause the flu, and by that definition won't shed...even after all of the science on vaccines admit that live-attenuated vaccines do shed. Curious:
"The 2019–2020 influenza vaccine recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) have remained mostly the same, with the exception of adding the LAIV to the immunization schedule."
- These articles tell us about what the WHO's process is and what they decided the 2019-2020 vaccine recommendations would be. I'll note that the first link speaks to concerns with preparing for H3N2 from the prior year, while the second link says they ended up not developing that specific strain of vaccines, after all, and the third link says they went ahead and included the H3N2 variant, after all. H3N2 was a "very severe" variant:
- Now, this is an interesting story from CNN that came out in November, 2019, an important time frame in the evolution of the covid story. Note the discussion about the need to develop a new type of all-purpose vaccine, a desire to test it widely, one that focused on a protein they link to a particular virus...like, say, a spike protein. Fauci is frequently quoted in it:
"But a universal flu shot would theoretically cover every strain of the flu using what’s known as an ice cream cone approach."
"Last spring, doctors at the NIH started testing universal flu shots on Sonn and other study participants to see how their bodies respond.
The research got an extra push in September when President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at developing a better flu vaccine.
Fauci said it could take less time – but still many years – to develop a semi-universal flu shot, which would protect against not all flu viruses, but rather a group of flu viruses."
"The faster and more precise method is not to grow the virus at all and instead just create the virus’ protein, he said.
“We clone the gene that codes for the specific protein we want,” Fauci said. “I don’t even want to see the virus. I just need the sequence of that virus, the genetic map of that virus. And you could send that to me by email.”
That’s the technology that’s being used to create the vaccines being trialed on participants like Sonn right now.
“We feel like we’re pioneers, and our volunteers are pioneers,” Ledgerwood said."
And there is a strong correlation between the 2019-2020 flu vaccine and COVID-19 susceptibility:
FF - How does the 2019 flu vaccine look like now? And how does that CNN piece from November, 2019 read in hindsight now? And wouldn't scientists stuck debating the binary lab leak vs natural origin theories be interested in digging into this curious compilation of official vaccine industry publications to investigate and see what kind of "there" is there? Taking off the blinders that each side's top "experts" are limited by in their debates, able to see another explanation right under their noses? As an experienced researcher I'm always leery of binary limited possibilities. The first is often a misdirection leading away from the true source. And so is the first alternate theory.
And with the entire industry of flu vaccines that such a discovery of skulduggery in would jeopardize has a whole lot of rea$on$ to not want this type of information to be revealed. It would generate a whole lot of "vaccine hesitancy," you know, creating distrust in science and public health. And a whole lot people, corporations, industries and bought complicit media would have a lot of malevolence and greed to be held accountable for. Under proper oversight. Right?
Limited thinkers and/or narrative control agents can stay with the convenient debate between two theories of dubious and unprovable origin as they've been doing since 2019-2020. But truthseekers would be wise to step outside the two convenient theories that are of dubious origin and unprovable and look into other theories that actually can be proven. Whether it's the hypothesis I present or another I haven't suspected. Limiting science to only two possibilities is anti-science. And rarely leads to truth.
I think the whole thing was a PCR fraud testing us from old covid lab leaks from the early 2000s and MERS variants that travelled the globe.
We were already exposed to sars/mers variants over the years. A vax was never needed. They weaponized testing to normalize mail in ballots, China took Hong Kong, got rid of Trump etc.
I always thought the main impetus was so China could take over Hong Kong while the rest of the world was preoccupied. Thanks for mentioning that! Nothing was appeasing those pesky protesters. Read the CCP National Security Law. Hong Kong is lost.
THE MAGIC POTION WASNT
CREATED FOR THE SCARY SICKNESS ….
THE SCARY SICKNESS WAS CREATED FOR THE MAGIC POTION🤫
All for a mythical engineered GoF RNA based super spreading pathogen. It was really just liars super spreading lies.
Such a hypnosis never really wears off in the minds of humanity.
What can you expect from being spoon fed the daily bread of corrupt info for profits?
(Call your Doctor....See your Doctor...."Trust" your Doctor....Really?)
The problem with Lab Leak is that there is NO biology that supports RNA fidelity to pandemic. While CRISPR keyboard gene jockeys can make synthetic clones of consensus sequences & grow those in vials or vats as pure RNA they do NOT change the rules of Mother Nature.
Gain of Function is badly named gain of Vision because RNA molecules can NOT be swabbed from a human or bat ass and grown only synthetic clones that are basis for ALL virology & vacciniology. To compare the clones to reality is as silly as saying highly enriched uranium is the same as raw earth minerals. Impossible ridiculous conflation of reality.
Read 1,200 page 2016 NIH funded GoF review & search for "however" where each section summary notes petrie dish models do not reflect "wild type virus" nor consider human immune systems. The big danger is liars with invisible enemy & spread of fear w bad ideas.
GoF is the method to make vaccines weaponized to be some Nature changing power. pffft!
https://web.archive.org/web/20161206155142/http://www.gryphonscientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Risk-and-Benefit-Analysis-of-Gain-of-Function-Research-Final-Report.pdf
Should be named “GAIN of Fraudci”
👍🏻👀
I used to think that there were only 2 possibilities: 1)spillover from the Wet market or the bat Cave--VERSUS 2)lab leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. But then I read a 3rd possibility: intentional release from the WIOV. I.e., that authorities WANTED a coronavirus pandemic so that a virus was actually released, not leaked. It took me a long time to understand that this was different from a lab leak. I think I heard this idea from an interview with David Martin on Del Bigtree "The High Wire."
I think that the point is that GOF should not be justified by fear of contagion from animals. It is rare that animals provide a threat of transmitting deadly bacteria or viruses. Some insect vectors--such as mosquitoes spreading malaria--are, however, the exception.
The timing was perfect to get rid of Trump.
There are many facts that would support the third possibility.
Diana, i believe as well it was intentional but I don't believe it released from the lab but rather strategically released across the globe in various areas. I think this was an intentional experiment to see how the masses would respond.
I think I agree with you. that Covid 19 broke out simultaneously many different places. Yet I never thought about intentional release. The propaganda refused to consider lab leak because they refuse to admit that GOF can be more deadly than nature. Also, if Covid 19 came from bats--then we all need to support WHO and the loyal virologists in their labs busy working on how to predict the next spillover, how to imagine it (or make it) even more deadly--and then develop vaccines at warp speed so that nobody has to get hospitalized or die from this horrible threat from the deadly bat caves. It couldn't possibly be associated with GOF. No. Everything's fine. Keep guarding the wet markets, pay no attention to the many many labs performing GOF research.
ofcourse, the Stadium of Inter in Milan where the 1st West world outbreak happened, is owned by Chinese!!! do the math! 0. releas was military games 2019 in China!! Hence COVID 19!!
I was reported to the director of the office I was working in by a med student who apparently was SHOCKED that I would posit that the virus was sprinkled on NY and California.
Because he doesn't believe that people would be so heartless and destructive.
I think she was just a good foot soldier
I said it in jest at the time. The brainwashing of the next generation of physicians is sad.
WHEN YOU BRIBE THE HHS, NIH, NIAID,FROM THE TOP DOWN…that’s a lot of medical-whores on the take…turning tricks for $$$.
Clearly it was a deliberate Plan by the DOD/DARPA/CIA. The rest is BS.
Also PhD Andrew Huff who was a VP at EcoHealth has blown the whistle but Congress ignores him. He states that the virus tech was transferred to China from DoD.
Andrew Huff is a whistleblower like pigs can fly.. the rediculous tale of shootout w FBI as close to movie of the week fiction as ever told. Having followed true whistleblowers from original 2010 war on WikiLeaks there is NOTHING that real whistleblowers endure that applies to Huff.. dude has everything but CIA cuff links & excels in selling lies.
Huff is one of the pandemic frauds documented by me as part of much underused Campfire wiki project.. good reference for #my2c https://www.campfire.wiki/doku.php?id=andrew_huff
"Scientists", like physicians today, are OWNED by their employers (government or corporations). They do what they are told (paid!) to do and that is determined by whoever controls their job/paycheck.
Yes find an independent practitioner
I was one. Try to find an "independent" surgeon, oncologist, intensivist, pediatrician, ob/gyn, etc, today. Good luck!
Only got this far in the paper:
"A growing body of circumstantial evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 may have been artificially enhanced to increase its transmissibility in humans."
I'm not a scientist, but how can Ralph Baric's papers announcing his creation of enhanced viruses, and the means of producing many more, be considered "circumstantial evidence"?
The problem is that GoF models apply only to petrie dish clones used to create vaccines.. they do not change the laws of biology where RNA molecules do not have fidelity to pandemic they cannot even be cultured and grown from samples in the wild.. it's a giant fraud w invisible enemy as close to highly enriched uranium potency applied to all the raw earth minerals.
Also note mono-cultures & identical sequence exists nowhere in Nature & claims of finding identical sequences is possible only from same batch of clones.. once these molecules are let loose in the air they have none of the high purity high concentration of lab models.
https://web.archive.org/web/20161206155142/http://www.gryphonscientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Risk-and-Benefit-Analysis-of-Gain-of-Function-Research-Final-Report.pdf
Loud applause!!!
I'm still waiting for 'viruses' to be proven to exist, according to the scientific method..
AI bots/trolls still here?
YES Done on purpose to pay back their Stockholders 2004 !!! Billions and Billions for the Companies and Stockholders Wake Up People!!! Raise our Vibration out of Duality Conquer and Divide into Letting Go Of Being A Victim To Others Not Easy But I Feel The Only Way out or Hunger Games Here We Come!!!
The immediate and vociferous denial of a scientifically plausible theory was enough to be confirmatory in my mind. Anti-science by definition. We’ve seen this type response way too often to be fooled. Trust in the scientific process and in medicine has been irreparably damaged.
Brett Weinstein check him out Diary of a CEO!!
Fun fact.. Bret's brother Eric is Peter Thiel/Palintir wing man & their dad the Godfather of patents for antibodies appointed by RFK but never mentioned in RFK Jr interview Bret kept on ice for 18mos before releasing.. shills for weaponized piles of money packaged as resistance... not an honest or insightful source.. follow the money!!
https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/29/2956566_palantir-the-war-on-terror-s-secret-weapon-.html
Initially I believed the lab leak theory but now I think this is unlikely. Denis Rancourt’s analysis confirms there was no deadly virus circulating the globe starting 2019. Steve Kirsch just interviewed first responders last week and they stated things were very quiet for them during the lockdown and volume of emergencies more than doubled as soon as the shots rolled out. I was thinking that focusing on lab leak vs. wet market in Wuhan might be set up as an intentional distraction for the public and those MDs leading the freedom movement. I recommend following Dr. David Martin on Odysee. He’s been analyzing the patents on SARS CoV2. Martin talks about Ralph Baric and his work at UNC Chapel Hill on GOF and making the spike protein to be cardio toxic. Martin talks about Baric developing a replication defective clone of the virus, meaning it can’t be transmitted, and getting poised, Baric’s words, for INTENTIONAL RELEASE. When Baric states intentional release he does not specify the route, will it be via aerosol or injection. Could it be the intentional release was via the jabs and the photos from Wuhan, masking and social distancing, was just part of the the operation to make us believe that there was a dangerous virus traveling around the globe. The shots are gene therapies involving LPNs and mRNA but you can also look at them as a man made synthetic virus. This was a massive psychological operation and many levels of deception were implemented including the fake PCR test which was designed to mislead people into believing some novel pathogen was circulating the globe. I now think the intentional release was delivered via injection which explains why people are more likely to get Covid the more shots they get.
There is NO biology to support the idea of RNA w fidelity to pandemic. In fact GoF is the method of creating ALL synthetic clones to design flu vaccines. They cannot find a wild RNA molecule and get it to grow.. this is all lies about invisible enemy.. Martin is chasing the mythology not biology. https://web.archive.org/web/20161206155142/http://www.gryphonscientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Risk-and-Benefit-Analysis-of-Gain-of-Function-Research-Final-Report.pdf
Also mRNA jabs are TRANSFECTIONS decades old failed cancer & gene therapy and anyone who still refuses to say Transfection is misinformed or lying. Human immune systems NEVER tolerate foreign proteins even if those repair genetic defects.
https://web.archive.org/web/20121025034826/https://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/28/magazine/the-biotech-death-of-jesse-gelsinger.html
I like the spirit and message behind the title and subtitle of this piece! And if we're to be intellectually honest and follow that spirit and message we wouldn't limit ourselves to just two possibilities of lab leak or zoonotic leap. We'd explore many hypotheses. Following the scientific method, of course. For public health. If that's the goal.
What if those investigating the origins of the COVID-19 virus were able to step outside of the binary mind box of lab leak vs natural origin theories? They might find another hypothesis lurks in plain sight. With ramifications that go much further, much deeper into the world vaccination theory, and risks revealing a much darker underbelly than most can fathom. Even worse than lab leak, Gain-of-Function or Dual Use research. Vaccines themselves as the point of origination. The annual flu vaccine for starters.
Take this information from pharmaceutical and health policymaker's official industry publications that may point us to the possibility that the 2019-2020 flu vaccine itself helped generate the perception that Covid was an exceptionally dangerous and infectious pathogen. The 2019-2020 flu jabs themselves may very well be responsible for the severe outcomes that were being experienced, either via direct injection or shedding from vaccines - that we know happens with the LAIV model that was standardized for use in the 2019-2020 version.
A scientist researching the origins would leave no stone unturned and wouldn't bet limited to two possibilities. A skilled scientific investigator on a relentless search for truth, no matter where it leads, would start digging around into what was actually in those 2019 flu jabs that could have precipitated the entire pandemic. Yes, we know that vaccines themselves shed. Fauci and the CDC eventually admitted that even about the mRNA COVID design. But especially the live-attenuated types that were used in the 2019-2020 flu season design. So one didn't need to receive the flu shot that year to have gotten very sick from it.
And the 2019 flu jab used a known severe H3N2 variant that was hotly debated about its inclusion in the quadrivalent because it was known to be very severe. Here's some interesting information that may help connect some dots when paired with the study found in the Substack link towards the end this comment. And don't miss the very bottom of this comment for the November, 2019 CNN piece, Fauci and his experiments with a new generation of vaccines, it's also very, very curious to consider with 20/20 hindsight. Given all that has transpired since the CNN piece takes on a very predictive appearance, similar to "priming" in psychological parlance:
- This publication describes a brand-new style of flu vaccine that came online for the 2019-2020 flu season. Mammalian cell-based instead of egg-based. Claims that it was studied for efficacy...but no mention of safety trials:
https://pharmaceutical-journal.com/article/news/first-cell-based-quadrivalent-vaccine-available-for-2019-2020-flu-season
"A new cell-based seasonal influenza vaccine has been issued marketing approval by the European Commission and will be available for the 2019/2020 flu season.
Flucelvax® Tetra (Seqirus) is the first cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIVc) to be made available in Europe and is licensed for use in individuals aged nine years and older.
To date, there have been no randomised controlled trials comparing the efficacy of QIVc and standard egg-based quadrivalent vaccines (QIVe)"
“This real-world study, along with other emerging evidence, indicates that cell-based influenza vaccines may result in better influenza-related outcomes compared to standard egg-based vaccine options in some seasons"
"In the UK, the potential advantages of QIVc, which is cultured in mammalian cells rather than eggs"
“We are pleased to be bringing Flucelvax Tetra to the UK next season and have sufficient capacity at our cell-based manufacturing facility in the US to also ensure supply in September 2019"
- This article is interesting. It says that they added live-attenuated influenza vaccines to the schedule. It goes on to say that flu vaccines most definitely, positively, absolutely don't cause the flu, and by that definition won't shed...even after all of the science on vaccines admit that live-attenuated vaccines do shed. Curious:
https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/20192020-influenza-vaccine-update
"The 2019–2020 influenza vaccine recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) have remained mostly the same, with the exception of adding the LAIV to the immunization schedule."
- These articles tell us about what the WHO's process is and what they decided the 2019-2020 vaccine recommendations would be. I'll note that the first link speaks to concerns with preparing for H3N2 from the prior year, while the second link says they ended up not developing that specific strain of vaccines, after all, and the third link says they went ahead and included the H3N2 variant, after all. H3N2 was a "very severe" variant:
https://elemental.medium.com/inside-the-making-of-the-flu-vaccine-c5d6f8cd174c
https://www.precisionvaccinations.com/who-vaccine-recommendations-are-used-pharmaceutical-companies-develop-produce-and-license-influenza
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/918053
***********************************************************************************************************
- Now, this is an interesting story from CNN that came out in November, 2019, an important time frame in the evolution of the covid story. Note the discussion about the need to develop a new type of all-purpose vaccine, a desire to test it widely, one that focused on a protein they link to a particular virus...like, say, a spike protein. Fauci is frequently quoted in it:
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/11/29/health/universal-flu-vaccine/index.html
"But a universal flu shot would theoretically cover every strain of the flu using what’s known as an ice cream cone approach."
"Last spring, doctors at the NIH started testing universal flu shots on Sonn and other study participants to see how their bodies respond.
The research got an extra push in September when President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at developing a better flu vaccine.
Fauci said it could take less time – but still many years – to develop a semi-universal flu shot, which would protect against not all flu viruses, but rather a group of flu viruses."
"The faster and more precise method is not to grow the virus at all and instead just create the virus’ protein, he said.
“We clone the gene that codes for the specific protein we want,” Fauci said. “I don’t even want to see the virus. I just need the sequence of that virus, the genetic map of that virus. And you could send that to me by email.”
That’s the technology that’s being used to create the vaccines being trialed on participants like Sonn right now.
“We feel like we’re pioneers, and our volunteers are pioneers,” Ledgerwood said."
And there is a strong correlation between the 2019-2020 flu vaccine and COVID-19 susceptibility:
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/how-flu-vaccines-accidentally-reveal
FF - How does the 2019 flu vaccine look like now? And how does that CNN piece from November, 2019 read in hindsight now? And wouldn't scientists stuck debating the binary lab leak vs natural origin theories be interested in digging into this curious compilation of official vaccine industry publications to investigate and see what kind of "there" is there? Taking off the blinders that each side's top "experts" are limited by in their debates, able to see another explanation right under their noses? As an experienced researcher I'm always leery of binary limited possibilities. The first is often a misdirection leading away from the true source. And so is the first alternate theory.
And with the entire industry of flu vaccines that such a discovery of skulduggery in would jeopardize has a whole lot of rea$on$ to not want this type of information to be revealed. It would generate a whole lot of "vaccine hesitancy," you know, creating distrust in science and public health. And a whole lot people, corporations, industries and bought complicit media would have a lot of malevolence and greed to be held accountable for. Under proper oversight. Right?
Limited thinkers and/or narrative control agents can stay with the convenient debate between two theories of dubious and unprovable origin as they've been doing since 2019-2020. But truthseekers would be wise to step outside the two convenient theories that are of dubious origin and unprovable and look into other theories that actually can be proven. Whether it's the hypothesis I present or another I haven't suspected. Limiting science to only two possibilities is anti-science. And rarely leads to truth.
Idk.
I think the whole thing was a PCR fraud testing us from old covid lab leaks from the early 2000s and MERS variants that travelled the globe.
We were already exposed to sars/mers variants over the years. A vax was never needed. They weaponized testing to normalize mail in ballots, China took Hong Kong, got rid of Trump etc.
We were scammed.
Ethidium fluorescence, doncha mean? "PCR fraud testing" is a tell. PCR is not a test.
I always thought the main impetus was so China could take over Hong Kong while the rest of the world was preoccupied. Thanks for mentioning that! Nothing was appeasing those pesky protesters. Read the CCP National Security Law. Hong Kong is lost.
I Just Finished Writing A Book.
It’s Called:
“Vaccines For Dummies”
That’s As Far As I Got.
I Figured I ‘Nailed It With The Title.
My Publisher Agreed.
I Made So Much Money From It That I Am Going To Publish The Sequel For Free:
“Vaccines For Dead People”
🤣 but 😢
😎