24 Comments

None. She’s headed to her tribunal and will be found guilty of treason. We all know the punishment for that.

Expand full comment

does it really matter ??? she will be held accountable on judgement day.

what matters now is that millions have been injured and dying ....

Expand full comment

Because of heightened scrutiny and the potential for congressional inquiry/testimony, I expect Rochelle won't be able to make a quick transition to Big Pharma. Perhaps TPTB will continue to take care of her through her husband:

CDC Director Walensky's Husband Received $5 Million in HHS Grants - and That's Just the Start of It

https://redstate.com/scotthounsell/2021/08/06/exclusive-cdc-director-walenskys-husband-received-5-million-in-hhs-grants-and-thats-just-the-start-of-it-n421809

Expand full comment

Rochelle Woalensky will take a job with the American/Chinese Wuhan mob

she'll take her masks and move right in like a bat crazy person winged in sin

she'll hang upside down from a bat lined tree, the ultimate clown for all to see

better than Moderna, Pfizer or KFC,she'll hand upside down for eternity.

Expand full comment

Dr. Jack, your headline is the exact question I thought of when I heard the news of her departure.

Perhaps the events of past three years will cause more people to pay attention to the revolving door of the regulators and big pharma. From what I understand, this been prevalent for decades but most people ignore it because it hasn’t affected them so directly/quickly.

Expand full comment

I don’t know my guess is Pfizer but it’s just a guess

Expand full comment

I vote Pfizer.

Expand full comment

.....it's Gottlieb's - who can APPEAR empathetic, anyhow - ties to ROCHE in Switzerland that REALLY exposes the lesser-known European figures, concerns (to say NOTHING of SAIC-Leidos) facilitating this plandemic - ESPECIALLY its CEO, Albert Hoffmann (as detailed in 'Coronagate', a NOT-perfect [and QUITE-raw, at times] documentary from 2021.....https://www.bitchute.com/video/vQfRZsZ4XI8s/

Expand full comment

Woodchipper ACME-Pharmaceuticals.

Expand full comment

I don't know enough to give an educated bet. I'll take Merck because she really did a lot to discourage off label drugs like Ivermectin. That helped pave the way for Ivermectin wannabee expensive drug replacements like Pfizer's Paxlovid (causes rebound infection such as Biden experienced) and Merck's Molnupiravir (associated with cancer due to its mechanism of promoting rapid evolution) Expensive diplomatic position is not out of the question. :)

Expand full comment

Thank you, thank you for your inspiring posts that make me want to learn more and more.

Expand full comment

To a student of body language, her insincerity was always apparent in her face when she spoke. Without focused effort and training, the human face telegraphs the emotions felt within.

Expand full comment

If you think Walensky was bad, just wait and see who gets chosen to replace her. Any guesses?

Expand full comment

I wouldn’t hire her to be a sandwich artist, but that’s just me. I’ll never forget or forgive the gleam in her eyes when she announced that babies could get jabbed. It was like she just won 50 powerballs. What a demon.

Expand full comment

I would love one of those really rare, ethical Congress persons, to push for a noncompete clause in all high ranking CDC/FDA positions where crucial policy decisions are done. ie, meke it illegal. Like someone like Rachel Walensky is unable to go work for Moderna or any other like 5 years.

Expand full comment