24 Comments

None. She’s headed to her tribunal and will be found guilty of treason. We all know the punishment for that.

Expand full comment

Really? But CDC said in their public statement that she was wonderful. There will be lots of exploding trains, and China will threaten us, and when people have forgotten her, and are instead worrying about nuclear bombs or Marburg plagues she will definitely get some plum appointment. We have to thank her for her service.

Expand full comment

does it really matter ??? she will be held accountable on judgement day.

what matters now is that millions have been injured and dying ....

Expand full comment

I think it matters for the following reason. Sage Hana (on substack) keeps writing about Kumbaya moments. When we don't hold our representatives accountable they have no qualms about violating our constitutional rights, endorsing policies that cause millions to die or be severely injured. Check out this analysis of Stanley Plotkin's testimony. Louis Conte in his "Truth Be Told" substack analyzes Plotkin's responses as he is forced to admit he killed millions of kids in his vaccine trials. He defends himself claiming it didn't matter and it was usual in those days (The "Good ole Days") https://louisconte.substack.com/p/stanley-plotkin-the-godfather-of

One reason for the success of pro vaccine propaganda is that government officials (like Fauci! like Trudeau) are basically smug and fearing no evil as they do whatever they want or need to do to consolidate their power. Meanwhile, any doctor or scientist who dares to question the narrative is completely censored and loses his grant money and even loses his license and livelihood. This intimidates nearly all dissidents (don't want to end up like Snowdon). There's a reason why most of the scientists opposing vaccines look past retirement age. Younger people have families and careers they must support.

Without dissidents there is no hope of persuading people to question vaccine safety and efficacy. Our pandemic and vaccine policy dilemmas are not over. In fact they have just begun! Biden is getting ready to or has already endorsed the WHO treaty which basically will give this corrupt organization complete control over our government. They have been entirely transparent about their intentions. In order to save and preserve our health, they will vigilantly watch for pandemics and impose global vaccine mandates to keep us safe. And if there are no pandemics--they can create them through gain of function labs heavily funded by our government. This is win win for big government and big pharmaceutical companies. Unfortunately, it's lose lose for the rest of us if we don't hold these people accountable so that they might be a bit intimidated and slow down their quest for authoritarian control.

Expand full comment

you might have seen this interview but she had some great observation regarding the pandemics and also the elderly and young ... among others.

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/interview-with-andrija-klaric-slobodni?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email#play

Expand full comment

Because of heightened scrutiny and the potential for congressional inquiry/testimony, I expect Rochelle won't be able to make a quick transition to Big Pharma. Perhaps TPTB will continue to take care of her through her husband:

CDC Director Walensky's Husband Received $5 Million in HHS Grants - and That's Just the Start of It

https://redstate.com/scotthounsell/2021/08/06/exclusive-cdc-director-walenskys-husband-received-5-million-in-hhs-grants-and-thats-just-the-start-of-it-n421809

Expand full comment

Rochelle Woalensky will take a job with the American/Chinese Wuhan mob

she'll take her masks and move right in like a bat crazy person winged in sin

she'll hang upside down from a bat lined tree, the ultimate clown for all to see

better than Moderna, Pfizer or KFC,she'll hand upside down for eternity.

Expand full comment

should read -she'll hang upsidedown for eternity

Expand full comment

Dr. Jack, your headline is the exact question I thought of when I heard the news of her departure.

Perhaps the events of past three years will cause more people to pay attention to the revolving door of the regulators and big pharma. From what I understand, this been prevalent for decades but most people ignore it because it hasn’t affected them so directly/quickly.

Expand full comment

The problem is nobody knows about the revolving door. Jessica Rose and another scientist attended a major convention of vaccine promoters and manufacturers. When they asked penetrating questions and presented evidence showing vaccines were associated with many adverse reactions and were ineffective in stopping infection or transmission--why these people were astounded. They wanted to hear more but the moderator refused to permit debate. One influential promoter of vaccines, himself disabled with tinnitis from them, admitted that he suffered a serious adverse reaction, but continued to insist it was worth it. After all, everyone who dies from mRNA vaccine injury goes straight to heaven. While the rest of us unvaccinated are headed straight for hell.

Expand full comment

I don’t know my guess is Pfizer but it’s just a guess

Expand full comment

I vote Pfizer.

Expand full comment

.....it's Gottlieb's - who can APPEAR empathetic, anyhow - ties to ROCHE in Switzerland that REALLY exposes the lesser-known European figures, concerns (to say NOTHING of SAIC-Leidos) facilitating this plandemic - ESPECIALLY its CEO, Albert Hoffmann (as detailed in 'Coronagate', a NOT-perfect [and QUITE-raw, at times] documentary from 2021.....https://www.bitchute.com/video/vQfRZsZ4XI8s/

Expand full comment

Woodchipper ACME-Pharmaceuticals.

Expand full comment

I don't know enough to give an educated bet. I'll take Merck because she really did a lot to discourage off label drugs like Ivermectin. That helped pave the way for Ivermectin wannabee expensive drug replacements like Pfizer's Paxlovid (causes rebound infection such as Biden experienced) and Merck's Molnupiravir (associated with cancer due to its mechanism of promoting rapid evolution) Expensive diplomatic position is not out of the question. :)

Expand full comment

Thank you, thank you for your inspiring posts that make me want to learn more and more.

Expand full comment

To a student of body language, her insincerity was always apparent in her face when she spoke. Without focused effort and training, the human face telegraphs the emotions felt within.

Expand full comment

If you think Walensky was bad, just wait and see who gets chosen to replace her. Any guesses?

Expand full comment

I wouldn’t hire her to be a sandwich artist, but that’s just me. I’ll never forget or forgive the gleam in her eyes when she announced that babies could get jabbed. It was like she just won 50 powerballs. What a demon.

Expand full comment

I would love one of those really rare, ethical Congress persons, to push for a noncompete clause in all high ranking CDC/FDA positions where crucial policy decisions are done. ie, meke it illegal. Like someone like Rachel Walensky is unable to go work for Moderna or any other like 5 years.

Expand full comment