beware the pandemic treaty is far from dead in the water as many believe in fact its coming back much sooner than we think..check out the james roguski substack for the details
I have always maintained that the early pfizer (purple topped vials), which first required dilution were more likely to cause adverse events than later vials for two reasons.
1. the PBS buffer resulted in an unstable formulations with agglomeration and aggregation leading to what is known as CARPA
2. they formed large particles which in and of themselves may cause toxicity
CARPA is complement activation. These researchers show this how the Comirnaty can cause this.
You can not fully indemnify a product and expect anything other than poor and arbitrary quality. Even the reporting of poor quality clot shots and other injections is for all practical purposes voluntary so it is a miracle we even hear about problems. There is neither incentive or punishment for making a mess of things.
The only driving force when manufacturing an indemnified product is your boss yelling at you to SHIP IT because cash flow and and quarterly reports and bonuses etc are hanging in the balance. Not much down side if you manufacturing crap but lots of upside if you meet deadlines and quantity goals.
If you want to destroy the manufacturing quality of ANYTHING, not just clot shots, give it complete indemnity protection. It is as no brainer as it gets. Same way it takes absolutely no brains to anticipate what the act of 1986 would do. Any realist with almost no brains realizes you can not depend on ethics and morals to get society in the aggregate to do the right thing because often those driving the bus have no ethics or morals. In a community like the Amish for example perhaps all you need is public shaming but in the secular world where most manufacturing happens you need CONSEQUENCES for poor quality. If you tell the manufacturer "no matter what you do all is forgiven" you can count on being abused. All of the events since 1986 have confirmed that sad truth. As the incidence curves for the number of autistic kids in helmets rockets skyward we've waited DECADES for "public health" to become alarmed and outraged enough to look into and do something about it. Because the paradigm is "no matter what you do all is forgiven, just go home and enjoy the profit". There is no punishment or incentive to fix it so it does not get fixed
I wonder if the difference in toxicity had anything to do with the management of the cold chain for storage of the vials. From what I can remember (in Aus) it was said, initially, that the ‘vaccines’ had to be transported and stored at minus something. A bit later it was ok to store them in the Drs practice or pharmacy fridges. ( Can’t imagine the state of them at the pop up ‘shops’!! ) I wonder if this helped to reduce toxicity and thetefore save people.
Given the specious "need" for the ineffective (best case) elixir one can presume that even if you make the "garbage by design" product perfectly it is likely to get worse the more mistakes you make while making it. Then again, like wine or fermented products (for example) perhaps mistakes will make it better. Or if you accidently make it weaker than specified or even pure inactive saline you may even make it safer and perhaps even more "effective" if for nothing more than the placebo effect. The whole enterprise is absurd when you think about it. Such is the nature of fear porn psyops that effectively urge you to jump off the 500 foot cliff to escape the harmless spider even if there are rocks in the shallow water below. Better to overcome your fear of spiders because the cost benefit is not working out.
Point is, out of the gate (In my and others' opinion) the product is useless toxic and dangerous as hell even if made perfectly. So in some ways worrying about "was it made properly" is a horse is out of the barn situation. The perfect most high quality manufacture of a poison product is to never make it and at most give some one an empty box, kind words and perhaps a hug and a doctor's beside manner which will go further to help heal someone than giving them a clot shot death lottery poison elixir
This person proposes that poorer temperature control can lead to more mRNA degradation, which may lead to a less fatal vaccine lot. They suggest that distance from manufacturing site might be a proxy for amount of degradation that has occurred. It is a good idea. Someone should investigate if distance from manufacturing site is correlated that batch 1-year mortality rate.
If improper handling destroys the poison perhaps improper handling is the solution. You could get your clot shot badge and keep your job by taking "spoiled and ineffective" poison.
Then again it is always possible that mishandling "poison by design" makes it worse. Better to just save the effort of worrying about whether it was mishandled and not take the shot.
If someone can prove that mishandling clot shots disarms them and renders them harmless perhaps that's a resistance strategy. Wouldn't that be something. Just leave the poison on the windowsill exposed to UV and heat to disarm it. Perhaps some one should look into it:)
Because when these things work "as designed" they often cause clots and myocarditis and other wonderful things. IE they need to be disarmed. Not as if you're going to lose any significant "protection" because they don't do that well in that area anyway and down the road sooner or later (so I've heard) you'll probably get covid ANYWAY. Worse yet, so I've heard your chances to get covid may actually INCREASE over time. So just say no to the clot shot myocarditis autoimmune neurologic harm lottery.
When I talk to those who chose to get the C19 jab, I tell them about howbadsmyjab.com and they usually say they lost their card. When you're in denial...
It is pretty easy for me to imagine a scenario where the manufacturers chose to manufacture large batches of “safer” formulas which were distributed to the masses in the US. And then variations of the formula in smaller batches to different locations. As a way to “QC” measure population SAE response to the different types of formulas. That would also explain why there are very specific bad batches.
They are experimenting, perfecting their kill jabs for various purposes. They want to assure a minimum "kill-rate" while also extending the period between injection and death as a CYA measure. If too many people die immediately after injection, it's pretty hard to keep people lined up for more;-)
Can someone provide, in layman’s terms, the percentage of c-19 jab recipients which experienced an SAE from Kentucky & Tennessee vs from other states. For example: maybe KY & TN saw a 10% SAE rate while other states saw a less than 1% SAE rate. This may provide a clearer understanding of how significantly affected people of Kentucky & Tennessee were.
This is the question I’ve been asking since 2021 and met with eye rolls and blank stares. It seems to fit .
MY MOTTO IS..."AXE THE VAX"
beware the pandemic treaty is far from dead in the water as many believe in fact its coming back much sooner than we think..check out the james roguski substack for the details
DR ALEX KENNERLY VASQUEZ SUBSTACK
VIDEO COMPILATION summary [8videos] 2025 will be The Great Purge of Misinformation, Disinformation, Free Thinking and Rational Conversation
https://healthythinking.substack.com/p/video-compilation-summary-8videos
Fuck the WHO and their PLANDEMIC treaty.
I have always maintained that the early pfizer (purple topped vials), which first required dilution were more likely to cause adverse events than later vials for two reasons.
1. the PBS buffer resulted in an unstable formulations with agglomeration and aggregation leading to what is known as CARPA
2. they formed large particles which in and of themselves may cause toxicity
CARPA is complement activation. These researchers show this how the Comirnaty can cause this.
https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/25/7/3595
Question: what is democratized data?
You can not fully indemnify a product and expect anything other than poor and arbitrary quality. Even the reporting of poor quality clot shots and other injections is for all practical purposes voluntary so it is a miracle we even hear about problems. There is neither incentive or punishment for making a mess of things.
The only driving force when manufacturing an indemnified product is your boss yelling at you to SHIP IT because cash flow and and quarterly reports and bonuses etc are hanging in the balance. Not much down side if you manufacturing crap but lots of upside if you meet deadlines and quantity goals.
If you want to destroy the manufacturing quality of ANYTHING, not just clot shots, give it complete indemnity protection. It is as no brainer as it gets. Same way it takes absolutely no brains to anticipate what the act of 1986 would do. Any realist with almost no brains realizes you can not depend on ethics and morals to get society in the aggregate to do the right thing because often those driving the bus have no ethics or morals. In a community like the Amish for example perhaps all you need is public shaming but in the secular world where most manufacturing happens you need CONSEQUENCES for poor quality. If you tell the manufacturer "no matter what you do all is forgiven" you can count on being abused. All of the events since 1986 have confirmed that sad truth. As the incidence curves for the number of autistic kids in helmets rockets skyward we've waited DECADES for "public health" to become alarmed and outraged enough to look into and do something about it. Because the paradigm is "no matter what you do all is forgiven, just go home and enjoy the profit". There is no punishment or incentive to fix it so it does not get fixed
I wonder if the difference in toxicity had anything to do with the management of the cold chain for storage of the vials. From what I can remember (in Aus) it was said, initially, that the ‘vaccines’ had to be transported and stored at minus something. A bit later it was ok to store them in the Drs practice or pharmacy fridges. ( Can’t imagine the state of them at the pop up ‘shops’!! ) I wonder if this helped to reduce toxicity and thetefore save people.
Given the specious "need" for the ineffective (best case) elixir one can presume that even if you make the "garbage by design" product perfectly it is likely to get worse the more mistakes you make while making it. Then again, like wine or fermented products (for example) perhaps mistakes will make it better. Or if you accidently make it weaker than specified or even pure inactive saline you may even make it safer and perhaps even more "effective" if for nothing more than the placebo effect. The whole enterprise is absurd when you think about it. Such is the nature of fear porn psyops that effectively urge you to jump off the 500 foot cliff to escape the harmless spider even if there are rocks in the shallow water below. Better to overcome your fear of spiders because the cost benefit is not working out.
Point is, out of the gate (In my and others' opinion) the product is useless toxic and dangerous as hell even if made perfectly. So in some ways worrying about "was it made properly" is a horse is out of the barn situation. The perfect most high quality manufacture of a poison product is to never make it and at most give some one an empty box, kind words and perhaps a hug and a doctor's beside manner which will go further to help heal someone than giving them a clot shot death lottery poison elixir
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/covid-vax-some-batches-increase-your/comment/68638563
This person proposes that poorer temperature control can lead to more mRNA degradation, which may lead to a less fatal vaccine lot. They suggest that distance from manufacturing site might be a proxy for amount of degradation that has occurred. It is a good idea. Someone should investigate if distance from manufacturing site is correlated that batch 1-year mortality rate.
Yes. So the less you comply with their protocols the less deaths;-)
If improper handling destroys the poison perhaps improper handling is the solution. You could get your clot shot badge and keep your job by taking "spoiled and ineffective" poison.
Then again it is always possible that mishandling "poison by design" makes it worse. Better to just save the effort of worrying about whether it was mishandled and not take the shot.
If someone can prove that mishandling clot shots disarms them and renders them harmless perhaps that's a resistance strategy. Wouldn't that be something. Just leave the poison on the windowsill exposed to UV and heat to disarm it. Perhaps some one should look into it:)
Because when these things work "as designed" they often cause clots and myocarditis and other wonderful things. IE they need to be disarmed. Not as if you're going to lose any significant "protection" because they don't do that well in that area anyway and down the road sooner or later (so I've heard) you'll probably get covid ANYWAY. Worse yet, so I've heard your chances to get covid may actually INCREASE over time. So just say no to the clot shot myocarditis autoimmune neurologic harm lottery.
This doesn't seem to account for age-dependent rollout, does it?
When I talk to those who chose to get the C19 jab, I tell them about howbadsmyjab.com and they usually say they lost their card. When you're in denial...
It is pretty easy for me to imagine a scenario where the manufacturers chose to manufacture large batches of “safer” formulas which were distributed to the masses in the US. And then variations of the formula in smaller batches to different locations. As a way to “QC” measure population SAE response to the different types of formulas. That would also explain why there are very specific bad batches.
Denmark is extremely small!
They are experimenting, perfecting their kill jabs for various purposes. They want to assure a minimum "kill-rate" while also extending the period between injection and death as a CYA measure. If too many people die immediately after injection, it's pretty hard to keep people lined up for more;-)
You say "anomaly" - I say "fraud."
Tomatoe, tomoto, potatoe, pototoe, let's call the who thing off;-)
Can someone provide, in layman’s terms, the percentage of c-19 jab recipients which experienced an SAE from Kentucky & Tennessee vs from other states. For example: maybe KY & TN saw a 10% SAE rate while other states saw a less than 1% SAE rate. This may provide a clearer understanding of how significantly affected people of Kentucky & Tennessee were.