I have a friend in Med school who listened politely to my rants against COVID vaccines at a party about a year and a half ago. Recently she reached out to me to get a medical exemption to avoid being forced to get a booster. She got her MEDICAL exemption (she’s had a heart related event) and frickin’ NYU refused to accept it a few weeks ago. So she’s doing her rotation elsewhere rather than caving to their draconian standards.
I think "eyes opened" is not enough. List the persons that have publicly stated (or are now willing to state) that the experimental drugs should not be offered to the general public, let alone mandated to certain groups, and is willing to put their credentials behind their official statement and stance, similar to how this article lists such persons: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/new-year-starts-with-intensifying
Warning about safety or negative efficacy is not enough. We need all those experts to release an official statement saying HALT or STOP and also figure out what we can do to stop this from happening again.
Answer yes to question 1 - all areas of science and medicine. As to question 2: I think a Dr Peter McCullough, Dr Ladapo, Dr Sherry Tenpenny, Dr Mercola’s, Dr. Alex Bekker, and similar voices from multiple areas/disciplines of healthcare. Too much power in a single hand limits the opinions that might be heard and who may work better in collaboration.
No one person should run the US national health programs; that duty should belong to a council of several well-qualified (and financially uncompromised) medical experts
Mathew Crawford has written about scientific publication and peer review being done in the blockchain. Perhaps the National Health programs are too large to be run by any person or small group of people. Humans given power are and forever will be corruptible. I dont fully understand crypto but from what I do grasp, it seems like DECENTRALIZATION is the answer to a LOT of problems! https://open.substack.com/pub/roundingtheearth/p/bitcoin-fixes-this-peer-reviewed?r=eohbw&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
How about Dr. James Lyons-Weiler? Seriously, you would be infinitely better than the current corrupticrats.
2. Dr. Ladapo
I have a friend in Med school who listened politely to my rants against COVID vaccines at a party about a year and a half ago. Recently she reached out to me to get a medical exemption to avoid being forced to get a booster. She got her MEDICAL exemption (she’s had a heart related event) and frickin’ NYU refused to accept it a few weeks ago. So she’s doing her rotation elsewhere rather than caving to their draconian standards.
To head health care: Robert F Kennedy Jr
Dr. Peter McCullough
A Kroger bagger with BLS certification would do a better job than Fauci
I would like to nominate Dr.James Lyons-Weiler to run our national public health program.
I think "eyes opened" is not enough. List the persons that have publicly stated (or are now willing to state) that the experimental drugs should not be offered to the general public, let alone mandated to certain groups, and is willing to put their credentials behind their official statement and stance, similar to how this article lists such persons: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/new-year-starts-with-intensifying
Warning about safety or negative efficacy is not enough. We need all those experts to release an official statement saying HALT or STOP and also figure out what we can do to stop this from happening again.
Sorry, we need decentralized systems, forget about the dream of having better central leadership solve our problems.
Answer yes to question 1 - all areas of science and medicine. As to question 2: I think a Dr Peter McCullough, Dr Ladapo, Dr Sherry Tenpenny, Dr Mercola’s, Dr. Alex Bekker, and similar voices from multiple areas/disciplines of healthcare. Too much power in a single hand limits the opinions that might be heard and who may work better in collaboration.
No one person should run the US national health programs; that duty should belong to a council of several well-qualified (and financially uncompromised) medical experts
Mathew Crawford has written about scientific publication and peer review being done in the blockchain. Perhaps the National Health programs are too large to be run by any person or small group of people. Humans given power are and forever will be corruptible. I dont fully understand crypto but from what I do grasp, it seems like DECENTRALIZATION is the answer to a LOT of problems! https://open.substack.com/pub/roundingtheearth/p/bitcoin-fixes-this-peer-reviewed?r=eohbw&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/incorruptible-data-and-medical-tyranny?fbclid=IwAR3fQnDl3DQNZLN2XqZCkuZt6GX0RxQGKq0C-OmjODNmEH3ll-he5YQAL68
“Who do you think should run our national public health program?”
IMO, there shouldn’t be a national program. I think it should be nationally funded in part though. Just not nationally “ran”.
Your or Dr. Zach Bush
Dr. Jack himself or Dr.Joseph Mercola. Been ahead of the issues for years.
1. Yes
2. Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, Ryan Cole, Lee Merritt. The idea of divide and conquer is a good one! Mercola might not be a bad addition.