Public Notice: Censorship & Attempted Coerced Speech by Twitter The Day After Elon Musk Bought Twitter
The last gasps of Twitter censorship? Or something more? James Lyons-Weiler, PhD (@lifebiomeduru) explains - and asks for your help (action item to defeat censorship).
With this notice, I hereby announce and make public the fact that if I cancel my appeal regarding my Fantini tweet, and delete this or any other tweet I have made or will make via my Twitter account @lifebiomedguru to regain account operability, I do so under protest, and, furthermore, that my act of deletion is in no way an admission that the message in the tweet violated “Community Standards”.
The “offending” tweet is about a #PopularRationalism article in which I shared Dr. Fantini’s results (which I’m 100% sure no Twitter censor could comprehend anyway) which shows that the molecular interactions between antibodies against the original Wuhan-type SARS-CoV-2 virus spike protein, human ACE2 receptors, and raft proteins in the human epithelial cell membranes could NOT interact to create antibody/antigen/protein complexes capable of effecting enhanced cellular entry for the original Wuhan-type spike protein, but COULD interact to create antibody/antigen/protein complexes capable of effecting enhanced cellular entry for every spike protein after the gamma variant (Delta and thereafter).
Disease enhancement has only been studied with small animal studies by Pfizer and Moderna using the Wuhan-type SARS-CoV-2 virus, which we know has evolved substantially.
I won’t belabor the details, but I will say that someone at Twitter did not get the memo that Elon Musk intends for Twitter to be a public forum.
Twitter and I are currently in a staring contest, because according to their process if I take down the “offending” Tweet I will be admitting that I violated community standards.
Thus this Public Announcement, which informs Twitter and everyone else that my act of deleting the tweet is under protest, and that I am NOT willing to acknowledge that the act of deletion is an acknowledgment of anything other than how annoyed I am that someone at Twitter in cannot possibly comprehend Dr. Fantini’s results does not think you have the right to learn about those results and their implications via my Twitter post.
Twitter needs to change its screw-ball habits and stop participating in creating scenarios in which they are coercing speech from people.
What do you think? Should I delete the Tweet? Drop a comment. And if you’re on Twitter, please share this #PopularRationalism article and tag @elonmusk and let him know there is/are censor-happy staff member(s) somewhere at Twitter, and that he needs to tell them to stop trying to censor communication about science and to stop trying to coerce speech.
Below is an image I encourage everyone to Tweet for maximum impact. Please tag @ElonMusk.
Thank you.
-JLW
(text corrected)
Since you asked for opinions: Definitely do not delete. It might take months for Musk's new policies to trickle down to the employees who were OK with being agents of the Ministry of Truth. But they have everything to lose by admitting their mistake. This needs to happen.
Musk will not have any control over Twitter for at least 6 months or a year. And that is if he does not pull his bid, which he should, particularly given the recent stock drop over Twitter’s overstatement of accounts. The most you can expect is that you will have alerted him to a problem — one I expect he is well aware of already. At this point in time, your only expectation of Twitter should be that it will continue to censor any speech that does not align with the Biden administration. My advice would be to let it go — find an alternative (GETTR, GAB, even Truth Social or Parler). Return to Twitter only when the censorship ends. In my opinion, for what that’s worth…