5 Comments

typo: that --> than

Expand full comment

Curious if this is on the mostly debunked Darwinian theory of macro evolution or proven (real) micro evolutionary processes?

Expand full comment

Micro evolution is a most deceptive term, it is only used to try and give credence to the claims of macro.

It should be referred to as 'variation within the kind' as being a more accurate and proper descrition of reality.

Expand full comment

You'll have more information than you could possibly imagine on the processes of evolution. Selection is not "debunked", but it's also not a "force". It's a process that occurs if the necessary and sufficient conditions exist. The debate about neutral evolution and selection will be reviewed thoroughly. The processes involved in speciation will as well. The full syllabus can be viewed on the registration page. https://ipak-edu.org/registration/?store-page=Principles-of-Evolution-p535532084

Expand full comment

Darwinian evolution is really unconvincing if you take the time to listen to the critics.

Its a bit like CAGW or the whole covid19 scam, it only seems credible if you refuse to listen to the counter argument.

Have a read of Icons of evolution byJonathan Wells or a comprehensive dismantling of the text book 'proofs' for evolution.

The Devil's Delusion: Atheism and its Scientific Pretensions by David Berlinski ( hardcore athesist) is another excellent book that dismantles Darwins fairy story.

Expand full comment