The credibility of this review was enhanced by the fact that the authors of this review included the unerreporting of the unvaccinated cohort and the probable overreporting of the vaccinated cohort in their critique. This shows that the authors of the review were not disinclined to include observations that would favor the study's conclusions. Nice. Balanced. Credibility? Intensified in this reader's mind.
I super appreciate this breakdown of the testing stage and how the results are manipulated to say something different than what reality is/was.
The credibility of this review was enhanced by the fact that the authors of this review included the unerreporting of the unvaccinated cohort and the probable overreporting of the vaccinated cohort in their critique. This shows that the authors of the review were not disinclined to include observations that would favor the study's conclusions. Nice. Balanced. Credibility? Intensified in this reader's mind.