Studies in toxicology usually study urine, feces, and other secretions and measure indirectly. Dr. Gatti, whose lab was raided for reporting detection of nanoparticles in vaccines, has a new study.
Might the thread like things be microplastics? Fleece is supposed to be very bad for the environment and easily released into the washing machine and water supply.
I bet I am not the only person wondering this. in light of the story of the four month old child in New Zealand whose parents are requesting unvaccinated blood to be on hand for his heart surgery, Do these doctors have any direct evidence or input based on experience of any possible impurities that might be expected in non-screened potentially vaccinated donor blood for a young child for heart surgery purposes?
Speaking of plasma, urine and feces—what are your thoughts on this study:
“Results: Toxin-like peptides, almost identical to toxic components of venoms from animals, like conotoxins, phospholipases, phosphodiesterases, zinc metal proteinases, and bradykinins, were identified in samples from COVID-19 patients, but not in control samples. “
The first investigative science-based evidence of Morgellons psychogenesis
Luca Roncati, Antonietta Morena Gatti, Teresa Pusiol, Francesco Piscioli, Giuseppe Barbolini, Antonio Maiorana. DOI: 10.1080/01913123.2016.1190434
"Morgellons disease is an infrequent syndromic condition, that typically affects middle-aged white women, characterized by crawling sensations on and under the skin, associated with itchy rashes, stinging sores, fiber-like filaments emerging from the sores, severe fatigue, concentrating difficulty, and memory loss. The scientific community is prone to believe that Morgellons is the manifestation of various psychiatric syndromes (Munchausen, Munchausen by proxy, Ekbom, Wittmaack-Ekbom). Up until now, no investigative science-based evidence about its psychogenesis has ever been provided. In order to close this gap, we have analyzed the filaments extracted from the skin lesions of a 49-year-old Caucasian female patient, by using a Field Emission Gun-Environmental Electron Scanning Microscope equipped with an X-ray microprobe, for the chemico-elemental characterization of the filaments, comparing them with those collected during a detailed indoor investigation, with careful air monitoring, in her apartment. Our results prove the self-introduction under the epidermis of environmental filaments. For the first time in the literature, we have scientifically demonstrated the self-induced nature of Morgellons disease, thereby wiping out fanciful theories about its etiopathogenesis."
For anyone who has dealt with even primitive microscopes and biopsies from Morgellons patients, it is absolutely undeniable that colored fibers are embedded in the deep layers of the dermis even in areas that have no surface damage. Put them under a fluorescent microscope and the fibers light up in standard biolab frequencies. Furthermore, Morgellons patients have been highly vocal since the beginning of the epidemic that these fibers shed and they are concerned about whether they are contagious. Gatti's "study" of a single patient demonstrates what Morgellons patients have been saying all along: the fibers in the body are the same as those which are shed into the environment. Yet Gatti claims that her work is proof of the other way around.
So where does she stand as a researcher? Is she willing to acknowledge the dangers of biolabs and nanotech, or is she pushing the sexist, ageist narrative expressed in the quote above by which she accuses Morgellons victims of being "fanciful middle-aged white women" suffering from psychogenesis?
Might the thread like things be microplastics? Fleece is supposed to be very bad for the environment and easily released into the washing machine and water supply.
I bet I am not the only person wondering this. in light of the story of the four month old child in New Zealand whose parents are requesting unvaccinated blood to be on hand for his heart surgery, Do these doctors have any direct evidence or input based on experience of any possible impurities that might be expected in non-screened potentially vaccinated donor blood for a young child for heart surgery purposes?
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/the-baby-will-story
Speaking of plasma, urine and feces—what are your thoughts on this study:
“Results: Toxin-like peptides, almost identical to toxic components of venoms from animals, like conotoxins, phospholipases, phosphodiesterases, zinc metal proteinases, and bradykinins, were identified in samples from COVID-19 patients, but not in control samples. “
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772524/
I may be late to the party on the toxic peptide study so I apologize if i missed a post.
Thanks!
EDIT:
I just found your post back in April regarding this so disregard :)
https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/about-those-venom-proteins?s=r
I'm glad they're up and running and putting out more studies, well done.
Until all of this gets parsed out, I hope unvaccinated blood banks or partnerships, like Safe Blood get up and running soon.
https://safeblood.net/
They found thread-like objects that might be parasites? Maybe this course will help. https://ipak-edu.org/registration/?store-page=%E2%80%8BParasites-and-Your-Health-p501281315
Here's my question.
This is Dr. Gatti in 2016:
The first investigative science-based evidence of Morgellons psychogenesis
Luca Roncati, Antonietta Morena Gatti, Teresa Pusiol, Francesco Piscioli, Giuseppe Barbolini, Antonio Maiorana. DOI: 10.1080/01913123.2016.1190434
"Morgellons disease is an infrequent syndromic condition, that typically affects middle-aged white women, characterized by crawling sensations on and under the skin, associated with itchy rashes, stinging sores, fiber-like filaments emerging from the sores, severe fatigue, concentrating difficulty, and memory loss. The scientific community is prone to believe that Morgellons is the manifestation of various psychiatric syndromes (Munchausen, Munchausen by proxy, Ekbom, Wittmaack-Ekbom). Up until now, no investigative science-based evidence about its psychogenesis has ever been provided. In order to close this gap, we have analyzed the filaments extracted from the skin lesions of a 49-year-old Caucasian female patient, by using a Field Emission Gun-Environmental Electron Scanning Microscope equipped with an X-ray microprobe, for the chemico-elemental characterization of the filaments, comparing them with those collected during a detailed indoor investigation, with careful air monitoring, in her apartment. Our results prove the self-introduction under the epidermis of environmental filaments. For the first time in the literature, we have scientifically demonstrated the self-induced nature of Morgellons disease, thereby wiping out fanciful theories about its etiopathogenesis."
For anyone who has dealt with even primitive microscopes and biopsies from Morgellons patients, it is absolutely undeniable that colored fibers are embedded in the deep layers of the dermis even in areas that have no surface damage. Put them under a fluorescent microscope and the fibers light up in standard biolab frequencies. Furthermore, Morgellons patients have been highly vocal since the beginning of the epidemic that these fibers shed and they are concerned about whether they are contagious. Gatti's "study" of a single patient demonstrates what Morgellons patients have been saying all along: the fibers in the body are the same as those which are shed into the environment. Yet Gatti claims that her work is proof of the other way around.
So where does she stand as a researcher? Is she willing to acknowledge the dangers of biolabs and nanotech, or is she pushing the sexist, ageist narrative expressed in the quote above by which she accuses Morgellons victims of being "fanciful middle-aged white women" suffering from psychogenesis?
I have been through a treatment of plasmapheresis. 5days 3hours a day. No fun