Studies in toxicology usually study urine, feces, and other secretions and measure indirectly. Dr. Gatti, whose lab was raided for reporting detection of nanoparticles in vaccines, has a new study.
Might the thread like things be microplastics? Fleece is supposed to be very bad for the environment and easily released into the washing machine and water supply.
I bet I am not the only person wondering this. in light of the story of the four month old child in New Zealand whose parents are requesting unvaccinated blood to be on hand for his heart surgery, Do these doctors have any direct evidence or input based on experience of any possible impurities that might be expected in non-screened potentially vaccinated donor blood for a young child for heart surgery purposes?
Speaking of plasma, urine and feces—what are your thoughts on this study:
“Results: Toxin-like peptides, almost identical to toxic components of venoms from animals, like conotoxins, phospholipases, phosphodiesterases, zinc metal proteinases, and bradykinins, were identified in samples from COVID-19 patients, but not in control samples. “
The first investigative science-based evidence of Morgellons psychogenesis
Luca Roncati, Antonietta Morena Gatti, Teresa Pusiol, Francesco Piscioli, Giuseppe Barbolini, Antonio Maiorana. DOI: 10.1080/01913123.2016.1190434
"Morgellons disease is an infrequent syndromic condition, that typically affects middle-aged white women, characterized by crawling sensations on and under the skin, associated with itchy rashes, stinging sores, fiber-like filaments emerging from the sores, severe fatigue, concentrating difficulty, and memory loss. The scientific community is prone to believe that Morgellons is the manifestation of various psychiatric syndromes (Munchausen, Munchausen by proxy, Ekbom, Wittmaack-Ekbom). Up until now, no investigative science-based evidence about its psychogenesis has ever been provided. In order to close this gap, we have analyzed the filaments extracted from the skin lesions of a 49-year-old Caucasian female patient, by using a Field Emission Gun-Environmental Electron Scanning Microscope equipped with an X-ray microprobe, for the chemico-elemental characterization of the filaments, comparing them with those collected during a detailed indoor investigation, with careful air monitoring, in her apartment. Our results prove the self-introduction under the epidermis of environmental filaments. For the first time in the literature, we have scientifically demonstrated the self-induced nature of Morgellons disease, thereby wiping out fanciful theories about its etiopathogenesis."
For anyone who has dealt with even primitive microscopes and biopsies from Morgellons patients, it is absolutely undeniable that colored fibers are embedded in the deep layers of the dermis even in areas that have no surface damage. Put them under a fluorescent microscope and the fibers light up in standard biolab frequencies. Furthermore, Morgellons patients have been highly vocal since the beginning of the epidemic that these fibers shed and they are concerned about whether they are contagious. Gatti's "study" of a single patient demonstrates what Morgellons patients have been saying all along: the fibers in the body are the same as those which are shed into the environment. Yet Gatti claims that her work is proof of the other way around.
So where does she stand as a researcher? Is she willing to acknowledge the dangers of biolabs and nanotech, or is she pushing the sexist, ageist narrative expressed in the quote above by which she accuses Morgellons victims of being "fanciful middle-aged white women" suffering from psychogenesis?
Read it again. You have misquoted Dr. Gatti, who is a highly credentialed and respected scientist. She did not say the women were fanciful. She described the scientific theories as fanciful. There is absolutely nothing ageist or sexist about a scientist describing a group as "middle-aged white women" if in fact, that is an accurate description, and we have no reason to believe otherwise.
The thousands of babies, children, men, and pets who suffered horribly through years of Morgellons lesions and discrimination from the medical community with labels such as 'Munschausen', as this publication promotes, have reason to believe otherwise.
Are you basing your view of accuracy from experience treating patients and working with Morgellons groups?
I think you may be unfamiliar with the context of this publication, sorry if I was harsh in my response. The context is that throughout the early 2000's, the Morgellons community had been putting great effort into asking the CDC and the medical establishment for help. Eventually the CDC ran an investigation in partnership with Kaiser Permanente and the Air Force (of course, why not.) After this investigation, they quietly moved dangerous Biolabs overseas to Ukraine, Wuhan etc. -- enter today's political situation. If they had acted responsibly at this time and addressed the harm that these technologies cause, the suffering and deaths that we see today with the bioengineered Spike protein could have been avoided. Likewise, if researchers with the right tools such as Gatti had been more open-minded and used better observation and less disdain for patients, they could have contributed to clarifying the condition and working against dangerous technologies -- like her work is finally doing now.
Rather than sharing their Morgellons investigation results with patients or taking next steps to figure out what was happening, the CDC kept data secret and launched an orchestrated campaign to label patients 'delusional.' (We see the same dynamic happening today in the campaigns that they launch: think 'I have a mild case and am grateful to be vaccinated.') Part of this orchestrated campaign was the message that delusional Morgellons patients were predominantly female, unemployed, uneducated, stay-at-home-moms, drug users -- all of this being untrue. This message was delivered to doctors, the media, websites. Patient support groups were sabotaged. You can see the strength and content of this language echoed in multiple websites online including Wikipedia as a good example. Dr. Gatti's abstract repeats this message and is embedded in this historical campaign against patients, whether she realized the full context of that at the time or not.
As I said in my first statement, this tactical message is inherently sexist (and in the case of Morgellons, suffered by men, women, children, and animals, untrue). Pairing a supposed 'delusional' condition while dismissively describing a patient set as 'female' - and expanding that description with slurs frequently used in their campaign such as 'house-wife, middle-aged, uneducated, paranoia, drug-user' links directly to the historical tendency of medicine to label female conditions as imaginary, psychosomatic, over-exaggerated... think hysteria and hysterectomy. The CDC specifically designed this campaign to be as derogatory and dismissive of these suffering patients as possible, and that disdain was fully embraced by the medical community - as evidenced here by Dr. Gatti's publication.
Because of this continuing embedded bias in the medical field, women are more likely to die from strokes and heart attacks because their complaints are dismissed - so this issue of sexism in medicine is valid for all conditions, not just the mysterious condition of Morgellons.
Might the thread like things be microplastics? Fleece is supposed to be very bad for the environment and easily released into the washing machine and water supply.
I bet I am not the only person wondering this. in light of the story of the four month old child in New Zealand whose parents are requesting unvaccinated blood to be on hand for his heart surgery, Do these doctors have any direct evidence or input based on experience of any possible impurities that might be expected in non-screened potentially vaccinated donor blood for a young child for heart surgery purposes?
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/the-baby-will-story
Speaking of plasma, urine and feces—what are your thoughts on this study:
“Results: Toxin-like peptides, almost identical to toxic components of venoms from animals, like conotoxins, phospholipases, phosphodiesterases, zinc metal proteinases, and bradykinins, were identified in samples from COVID-19 patients, but not in control samples. “
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772524/
I may be late to the party on the toxic peptide study so I apologize if i missed a post.
Thanks!
EDIT:
I just found your post back in April regarding this so disregard :)
https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/about-those-venom-proteins?s=r
I'm glad they're up and running and putting out more studies, well done.
Until all of this gets parsed out, I hope unvaccinated blood banks or partnerships, like Safe Blood get up and running soon.
https://safeblood.net/
They found thread-like objects that might be parasites? Maybe this course will help. https://ipak-edu.org/registration/?store-page=%E2%80%8BParasites-and-Your-Health-p501281315
Here's my question.
This is Dr. Gatti in 2016:
The first investigative science-based evidence of Morgellons psychogenesis
Luca Roncati, Antonietta Morena Gatti, Teresa Pusiol, Francesco Piscioli, Giuseppe Barbolini, Antonio Maiorana. DOI: 10.1080/01913123.2016.1190434
"Morgellons disease is an infrequent syndromic condition, that typically affects middle-aged white women, characterized by crawling sensations on and under the skin, associated with itchy rashes, stinging sores, fiber-like filaments emerging from the sores, severe fatigue, concentrating difficulty, and memory loss. The scientific community is prone to believe that Morgellons is the manifestation of various psychiatric syndromes (Munchausen, Munchausen by proxy, Ekbom, Wittmaack-Ekbom). Up until now, no investigative science-based evidence about its psychogenesis has ever been provided. In order to close this gap, we have analyzed the filaments extracted from the skin lesions of a 49-year-old Caucasian female patient, by using a Field Emission Gun-Environmental Electron Scanning Microscope equipped with an X-ray microprobe, for the chemico-elemental characterization of the filaments, comparing them with those collected during a detailed indoor investigation, with careful air monitoring, in her apartment. Our results prove the self-introduction under the epidermis of environmental filaments. For the first time in the literature, we have scientifically demonstrated the self-induced nature of Morgellons disease, thereby wiping out fanciful theories about its etiopathogenesis."
For anyone who has dealt with even primitive microscopes and biopsies from Morgellons patients, it is absolutely undeniable that colored fibers are embedded in the deep layers of the dermis even in areas that have no surface damage. Put them under a fluorescent microscope and the fibers light up in standard biolab frequencies. Furthermore, Morgellons patients have been highly vocal since the beginning of the epidemic that these fibers shed and they are concerned about whether they are contagious. Gatti's "study" of a single patient demonstrates what Morgellons patients have been saying all along: the fibers in the body are the same as those which are shed into the environment. Yet Gatti claims that her work is proof of the other way around.
So where does she stand as a researcher? Is she willing to acknowledge the dangers of biolabs and nanotech, or is she pushing the sexist, ageist narrative expressed in the quote above by which she accuses Morgellons victims of being "fanciful middle-aged white women" suffering from psychogenesis?
Read it again. You have misquoted Dr. Gatti, who is a highly credentialed and respected scientist. She did not say the women were fanciful. She described the scientific theories as fanciful. There is absolutely nothing ageist or sexist about a scientist describing a group as "middle-aged white women" if in fact, that is an accurate description, and we have no reason to believe otherwise.
The thousands of babies, children, men, and pets who suffered horribly through years of Morgellons lesions and discrimination from the medical community with labels such as 'Munschausen', as this publication promotes, have reason to believe otherwise.
Are you basing your view of accuracy from experience treating patients and working with Morgellons groups?
I'm saying you misrepresented what is written above. The publication isn't promoting anything. It's just a report. Take it or leave it. Geez.
I think you may be unfamiliar with the context of this publication, sorry if I was harsh in my response. The context is that throughout the early 2000's, the Morgellons community had been putting great effort into asking the CDC and the medical establishment for help. Eventually the CDC ran an investigation in partnership with Kaiser Permanente and the Air Force (of course, why not.) After this investigation, they quietly moved dangerous Biolabs overseas to Ukraine, Wuhan etc. -- enter today's political situation. If they had acted responsibly at this time and addressed the harm that these technologies cause, the suffering and deaths that we see today with the bioengineered Spike protein could have been avoided. Likewise, if researchers with the right tools such as Gatti had been more open-minded and used better observation and less disdain for patients, they could have contributed to clarifying the condition and working against dangerous technologies -- like her work is finally doing now.
Rather than sharing their Morgellons investigation results with patients or taking next steps to figure out what was happening, the CDC kept data secret and launched an orchestrated campaign to label patients 'delusional.' (We see the same dynamic happening today in the campaigns that they launch: think 'I have a mild case and am grateful to be vaccinated.') Part of this orchestrated campaign was the message that delusional Morgellons patients were predominantly female, unemployed, uneducated, stay-at-home-moms, drug users -- all of this being untrue. This message was delivered to doctors, the media, websites. Patient support groups were sabotaged. You can see the strength and content of this language echoed in multiple websites online including Wikipedia as a good example. Dr. Gatti's abstract repeats this message and is embedded in this historical campaign against patients, whether she realized the full context of that at the time or not.
As I said in my first statement, this tactical message is inherently sexist (and in the case of Morgellons, suffered by men, women, children, and animals, untrue). Pairing a supposed 'delusional' condition while dismissively describing a patient set as 'female' - and expanding that description with slurs frequently used in their campaign such as 'house-wife, middle-aged, uneducated, paranoia, drug-user' links directly to the historical tendency of medicine to label female conditions as imaginary, psychosomatic, over-exaggerated... think hysteria and hysterectomy. The CDC specifically designed this campaign to be as derogatory and dismissive of these suffering patients as possible, and that disdain was fully embraced by the medical community - as evidenced here by Dr. Gatti's publication.
Because of this continuing embedded bias in the medical field, women are more likely to die from strokes and heart attacks because their complaints are dismissed - so this issue of sexism in medicine is valid for all conditions, not just the mysterious condition of Morgellons.
I have been through a treatment of plasmapheresis. 5days 3hours a day. No fun