Peter Marks, MD, Ph.D.; Robert Califf, MD of the US FDA Post Delusional Fairy Tales About the Success of Covid-19 Vaccines
They are incompetent or lying. Reality has caught up with the agenda; they sound completely outdated. It is truly an exercise in panic that the public might catch on to faults with other vaccines.
I dedicate this article to the memory of Joshua Kuntz.
An article from JAMA Network, entitled "Is Vaccination Approaching a Dangerous Tipping Point?", discusses the declining vaccination rates in the United States, particularly against COVID-19. It focuses on the challenges posed by what it calls “vaccine misinformation” and the strategies that clinicians and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) can try to employ to try to counter this issue. The article stresses the importance of providing the public and healthcare professionals with timely, accurate, and easily understandable information about the benefits and risks of vaccination.
Huh. Now that would be novel, coming from the FDA at least.
Key Points
Declining Vaccination Rates: The article highlights concerns over the decreasing number of people in the U.S. choosing to get vaccinated, attributing this trend to various factors such as safety concerns and religious beliefs. It makes references to the success of vaccines to contributing to their success (which recognizable to Popular Rationalists as the complacency fallacy).
Impact of Misinformation: The article claims that the spread of vaccine misinformation has significantly contributed to this decline in acceptance, necessitating a robust response from health authorities and clinicians. The authors never mention myocarditis, blood clots, or other adverse events.
FDA's Role: The article claims that the FDA is committed to providing health care professionals and the public with clear and factual information to explain the benefits and risks associated with vaccines, aiming to improve vaccination rates and public health outcomes.
Reduced rates of hospitalization among the vaccinated. The article claims that the COVID19 vaccines have saved millions of lives.
But the article ignores the fact that were it not for the vaccine and public health initiatives that forced all clinical roads to lead to these failed vaccines, the vaccines would not be increasing the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus - leading to sustained hospitalizations and deaths in the first place.
Insights and Questions
Evaluating Public Perception: How does the public's perception of vaccine safety and efficacy influence vaccination rates, and what strategies can be most effective in changing these perceptions?
WE understand that COVID19 vaccine efficacy is negative. There is no changing the reality, and thus there is no way to change perception without disinformation, misinformation and propaganda. But even these have failed.
Role of Misinformation: In what ways can health authorities more effectively combat the spread of vaccine misinformation?
WE understand that the FDA, CDC, HHS are the mass purveyors of vaccine misinformation, in particular relying on false premises of PCR+ = diseases, relying on the public’s relative ignorance that non-quantitative PCR is not quantitative PCR, relying on study designs that guaranteed the appearance of much higher efficacy than deserved, and relying on the public to be distracted by spectacles that amaze and wonder.
Long-term Implications: What could be the long-term public health consequences if the trend of declining vaccination rates continues, and how might this affect future pandemic preparedness?
WE understand that the virus would continue to evolve away from virulence (pathogenicity) and increased transmissibility. Chronic vaccination using extinct variants will continue to forestall durable immunity, continue to cause disease enhancement, and increase the risk of pathogenic priming leading to chronic illness by new-onset autoimmunity.
I agree with the claim that there remain challenges in vaccination efforts in the U.S. - and they are well-deserved. I also agree there is a need for clear communication and factual information dissemination to improve public health outcomes. But I want to avoid continued over-vaccination and vaccinosis in humans.
To those of us who pay attention to direct and indirect consequences, the FDA’s latest gaslighting attempt is atrociously naive. They want readers to believe that data support the notion that the vaccinated have lower hospitalization rates and deaths than the unvaccinated.
Readers will recall that negative efficacy means more circulating virus - more COVID19 - more gross hospitalizations in the first place. And inexact vaccination with last month’s variant means disease enchancement, a.k.a. antibody-dependent enhancement.
NO data exist on the rate of ADE from any other variant other than alpha variant - with an alpha variant vaccine. Jacques Fantini’s data stands as strong evidence the ADE was in play for the Delta sweep across Europe.
Study Suggests That Moderna and Pfizer Vaccine Selection Triggered Disease Enhancement in Delta and Its Spread
Researchers at Boston University have reported that individuals vaccinated with the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine have no immunity to more recent variants; in fact, v2 and v3 of the Beta variant had escaped humoral immunity from these vaccines (Full text
Further, if estimates of efficacy for transmission were biased by the 8-week window of ignoring cases and deaths in the vaccinated, we of course expect bias in the “protection against death” estimates.
We’ve been on to that cheap trick for a long time (1/25/21)
and more recently:
Of course, FDA’s paper includes none of these cold, hard facts.
At best, the FDA’s paper is one-sided. At worst, it’s helping to perpetuate absurd and dangerous policies.
To help expedite comprehension, here are a few links discussing the negative efficacy of COVID-19 jabs - also ignored, of course, by Peter Marks and Robert Califf in their article.
Follow the Science, Not Mere “Authority”, on COVID19 PCR False Positive Rates – jameslyonsweiler.com
6/2021 Horowitz: FDA responds to negative efficacy of variant boosters with another variant booster
4th Vaccine Dose Showed Negative Relative Vaccine Efficacy Against COVID Death: Study
Study: Pfizer COVID vaccine efficacy wanes 27 days after dose 2 in teens
Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against Omicron or Delta infection (Ontario Study)
UPDATE! DR. MCCULLOUGH SHARED THIS ANALYSIS. THIS LATEST STUNT SHOULD BE THE END OF THEIR TENURE AT THE FDA.
Their statements aren't coming from incompetence. They're coming from corruption and criminality.
By now, all doctors with any integrity know that these mRNA products haven't saved a single life, but have killed more people under 60 than covid has.
The claim that covid vaccines saved millions of lives is so ridiculous! People would have had to have been dying at a rate much higher than they were at the beginning of covid (and when no vaccines were available) for their number of lives saved (I think they say 3 million in the U.S.) to be plausible. Their model is based on numerous false premeses.