97 Comments

I have never liked him....he always cuts-off people and is arrogant.....so not surprised....

Expand full comment

Thanks for this. Tyson also made a complete and total ass of himself on Bill Maher a few weeks back. He refuses to listen to data or science on the vaccine, and constantly defaults to the BS positions you have outlined. It led me to post on his Facebook page that he would be better off just focusing on physics instead of medicine because he is showing how untrained and ignorant he really is.

Expand full comment

Tyson has been a shill for Bill Gates for over a decade using science status to push false claims about gmo foods in the same way he peddles these deadly jabs. It's the press release IPO version with a veneer of science like the updated version of doctors marketing cigarettes for big tobacco in the era before these toxic profiteers fully expanded into food and drugs.

Expand full comment

This is standard for those still parroting the narrative. The same talking points from May 2020 and zero acknowledgement of anything that has happened since then. Amazing how people with stacks of degrees can be so obtuse.

Expand full comment

Its the same old leftist playbook in action. Make up another word, change a definition, create blame, label opponents. Predictable pattern.

Expand full comment

What you see in real time with Neil is a highly indoctrinated individual Brainwashed by the global cult who has been mind controlled to trigger on anything that attacks their narrative and control.

Expand full comment

He's been a paid performer from the start

Expand full comment

I wish Bet-David had challenged him properly. Frustrating to watch him ignore the ludicrously illogical statements.

Expand full comment

Neil deGrasse Tyson is an absolute retard. Before he made this so publicly clear discussing about corona, I thought that he was just a mediocre "TV-physicist".

Further proof of the very low correlation between academic degrees and IQ.

Expand full comment

My main takeaway (other than your logic!), is how on God's green earth, could this guy, Tyson, be a scientist?

Expand full comment

I saw this and like this podcast, but find it difficult to listen to NDT. He is what one would call a 'useful idiot', still complaint with 'the science' (scientism) and oblivious to the reality of the situation in its entirety, which means assessing risk/benefit in the face of ALL RISK. (or perhaps he knows the truth but cant speak of it bc he likes his job) Benefit of the doubt aside, vaccine science forgets the risk of death and injury ad nauseam (like tobacco science) so all he is doing is parroting this insanity. I find it alarming the narrative shifting us all to do what's best for others rather than what's best for self too. It's a concerning shift that rides along-side LGBTQ(AI) social justice propaganda that pits an us vs them victimhood onto society. This concerning shift to victimhood centers on the emotional and is the usual propagandists bent. Neil is literally peddling propaganda and it's all too noticeable to me now permeating every facet of media, just about. I'll do what is right for my body, not for someone else's thank you. And the idea melded into ppl's brains -that the narrative has been conveyed- from the beginning, "it's ok to sacrifice self for the common good". A healthy society balances common good with individual health/rights, not to sacrifice one for the other. This self-righteousness coming from many like NDT leaves a feudalism taste in my mouth.

Also viruses are part of life and no one should be blamed or feel guilty if someone gets sick from a virus. Humans didn't get his far by hiding from viruses. Let's blame (at least) those CREATING the viruses.

Expand full comment

Just shared with Neil's twitter handle @neiltyson

Expand full comment

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 Bravo, I would NEVER debate you, lol.

Expand full comment

The guy is a clown. So many things wrong in one video.

Expand full comment

Every time I watch deGrasse he seems like an arrogant, rich, close-minded, self-congratulatory person who had a modicum of knowledge, but based on this, has a much higher estimation of what his intellectual abilities really are. I just turn the windbag off whenever he comes on

Expand full comment

Note to arrogant de Grasse, from someone MUCH smarter than him: Nobel Prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman’s justly famous quote:

“In general we look for a new law by the following process. First we guess it. Then we compute the consequences of the guess to see what would be implied if this law that we guessed is right. Then we compare the result of the computation to nature, with experiment or experience, compare it directly with observation, to see if it works. If it disagrees with experiment it is wrong. In that simple statement is the key to science. It does not make any difference how beautiful your guess is. It does not make any difference how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is—if it disagrees with experiment it is wrong. That is all there is to it.” (Richard Feynman, The Character of Physical Law [London: British Broadcasting Corporation, 1965], 4, emphasis added.)

I might add—and I’m positive Feynman would agree—that it doesn’t matter how many people agree with you, or whether they’re members of national academies of science. If your prediction disagrees with experiment, observation, experience, nature, it’s wrong. Period. Not bowing to consensus but systematic skepticism is the hallmark of true science.”

Expand full comment