The "Office for Science and Society" published an embarrassing, inaccurate, and condescending opinion blog article that really should have been reviewed by an immunologist and a bioethicist.
The bio-science world has gone mad. Past vaxx delinquency findings are unsettling. Will we ever know, by lot number, the list of complete contents in each of the current Covid vaccines? Why is bio-security now being intensely amplified by Biden’s new executive order?
Sometimes there is a student news outlet and it might be worthwhile to send this to them as a comment on their university web pages. Don’t know how daring they are at McGill student press but this is a great essay response and it’s surfacing the colonialism ‘mote in their own eye’ rather nicely so the rising generation may take note! If so, it would get under their establishment skin for sure— home audiences matter. Thank you for the depth of the essay.
I live in Montreal. Let's just say McGill hasn't impressed these past 2.5 years. At all.
They embraced every piece of political propaganda, pseudoscience (lockdowns, curfews masks and passports - all the while either never presenting evidence or citing junk studies) and the experimental mRNA campaign including boosters. Hard. They're the gang that inspired me to call them TV Dinner Experts (TM). Give me something to fear about and I'll find you a McGill expert peddling it.
Their science communicator writer is an expert at writing articles aimed at bunking science laced with ad hominem and other logical fallacies. The pieces are logical train wrecks.
I need help. A specialty clinic won't let me schedule because I am unvaccinated. I wrote them a well-cited letter of complaint explaining why that protects no one and is unethical. They didn't budge. What is the appropriate body with jurisdiction over this that I can file a complaint with? I am not sure it is the state medical board:
Even if they are the right people, what is the chance it would make a difference? I can just get a referral to a different clinic and forget it, but I am just sick of these incompetent doctors. I doubt they even read my letter.
Speaking of embarrassing gaffes, Lyons-Weiler's article conflates two separate things - an experimental contraceptive vaccine (that never went beyond the research stage, and a well-established vaccine against tetanus, a killer disease of infants in Third World countries. The 300-500 days of antibodies against the pregnancy hormone hCG refers to the experimental contraceptive vaccine, NOT the tetanus vaccine. The idea that tetanus vaccine is intended as population control has been debunked repeatedly, but persists in part because of the bizarre delusion that vaccines are a "depopulation" tool.
It's alarming that Lyons-Weiler seems not at all concerned about tetanus killing African babies, as he's willing to fan distrust of tetanus vaccination in other to fulfill his overall antivaccine goals, which include fearmongering about nonexistent Covid-19 vaccine effects on fertility. Promoting avoidance of lifesaving vaccination in the Third World is a prime example of "First-world down-your-nosism" which he falsely attributes to the McGill article. Time to look in the mirror, James.
This is so atrocious. Even God couldn't save the Queen.
The bio-science world has gone mad. Past vaxx delinquency findings are unsettling. Will we ever know, by lot number, the list of complete contents in each of the current Covid vaccines? Why is bio-security now being intensely amplified by Biden’s new executive order?
Did McGill ever receive any funding (bribery or hush money) from any Gates related entities? I will bet YES!
McGill does receive grants from the BMGF. Not $200 million like Stanford but millions over the years.
Sometimes there is a student news outlet and it might be worthwhile to send this to them as a comment on their university web pages. Don’t know how daring they are at McGill student press but this is a great essay response and it’s surfacing the colonialism ‘mote in their own eye’ rather nicely so the rising generation may take note! If so, it would get under their establishment skin for sure— home audiences matter. Thank you for the depth of the essay.
Heads up - the line "The animation point is trivial compared to the logical flaw of the author regarding antibody levels" appears twice back to back!
Great, fixed, thank you!
I shot an email to McGill letting them know I didn't feel overly confident in the author's grasp of the facts. Thanks, James!
I live in Montreal. Let's just say McGill hasn't impressed these past 2.5 years. At all.
They embraced every piece of political propaganda, pseudoscience (lockdowns, curfews masks and passports - all the while either never presenting evidence or citing junk studies) and the experimental mRNA campaign including boosters. Hard. They're the gang that inspired me to call them TV Dinner Experts (TM). Give me something to fear about and I'll find you a McGill expert peddling it.
Their science communicator writer is an expert at writing articles aimed at bunking science laced with ad hominem and other logical fallacies. The pieces are logical train wrecks.
Beautifully concise. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly quote in the end might just be the most polite thing I have ever seen.
I need help. A specialty clinic won't let me schedule because I am unvaccinated. I wrote them a well-cited letter of complaint explaining why that protects no one and is unethical. They didn't budge. What is the appropriate body with jurisdiction over this that I can file a complaint with? I am not sure it is the state medical board:
https://www.mbc.ca.gov/Consumers/file-a-complaint/
https://www.mbc.ca.gov/Resources/brochures/Complaints.aspx
Even if they are the right people, what is the chance it would make a difference? I can just get a referral to a different clinic and forget it, but I am just sick of these incompetent doctors. I doubt they even read my letter.
You may wish to contact Vaccine Choice Canada and see if they have some information that might help.
Follow the money!
Money is honey, my little sonny,
And a rich man's joke is always funny.
Speaking of embarrassing gaffes, Lyons-Weiler's article conflates two separate things - an experimental contraceptive vaccine (that never went beyond the research stage, and a well-established vaccine against tetanus, a killer disease of infants in Third World countries. The 300-500 days of antibodies against the pregnancy hormone hCG refers to the experimental contraceptive vaccine, NOT the tetanus vaccine. The idea that tetanus vaccine is intended as population control has been debunked repeatedly, but persists in part because of the bizarre delusion that vaccines are a "depopulation" tool.
It's alarming that Lyons-Weiler seems not at all concerned about tetanus killing African babies, as he's willing to fan distrust of tetanus vaccination in other to fulfill his overall antivaccine goals, which include fearmongering about nonexistent Covid-19 vaccine effects on fertility. Promoting avoidance of lifesaving vaccination in the Third World is a prime example of "First-world down-your-nosism" which he falsely attributes to the McGill article. Time to look in the mirror, James.