From the study: "Longer time from initial infection was associated with a higher probability of reinfection, although the difference was smaller than expected. Surprisingly, 2 or more doses of vaccine were associated with a slightly higher probability of reinfection compared with 1 dose or less."
I am shocked by the sheer number of COVID cases, regardless of re-infection. Just yesterday, i encountered THREE people who were just getting over the virus. All three had both shots and were double boosted. What does this portend for the future for them?
Why are they inverting the x-axis in the figures? To make it look as if the probability of reinfections is decreasing with time? What is this? Very deceiving.
Recent Nature article found SARS-COV-2 infected monocytes via Fc receptor ( i.e., antibody mediated infection). A recent autopsy study found more wide spread infections to other organs for 2 plus vaccine dosed. Completely in agreement with this reinfection data.
COVID was scam-plandemic with ulterior-motives from the get go…. Depopulation campaign, control and taking away of our “Natural Rights”! Humanity needs to wake up!
The vaccines were supposed to stop transmission. That was BS and we all knew it. Then it was supposed to prevent infection. Same result. Then it was supposed to reduce 'severe disease' or outcomes. Dud. It may have helped prevent death and hospitalizations in the beginning but that lasted about 15 minutes. Now the claim is it's better to have hybrid protection. Total BS. Logic dictates natural immunity is better. Another claim is the vaccinated spread the disease less than the unvaccinated. They also aid the spike didn't leave the site of injection. That turned out to be wrong. It ended up in the heart and ovaries. They also said the spike was safe.
The funny part is this magic new formula they plan to roll out again spots for the original strain. Why? Can anyone explain this to me?
Thank you!
From the study: "Longer time from initial infection was associated with a higher probability of reinfection, although the difference was smaller than expected. Surprisingly, 2 or more doses of vaccine were associated with a slightly higher probability of reinfection compared with 1 dose or less."
I am shocked by the sheer number of COVID cases, regardless of re-infection. Just yesterday, i encountered THREE people who were just getting over the virus. All three had both shots and were double boosted. What does this portend for the future for them?
A lot of reasons to be concerned, for sure
Gotta love the wording "1 dose or less".
Hi James Lyons-Weiler,
Why are they inverting the x-axis in the figures? To make it look as if the probability of reinfections is decreasing with time? What is this? Very deceiving.
Recent Nature article found SARS-COV-2 infected monocytes via Fc receptor ( i.e., antibody mediated infection). A recent autopsy study found more wide spread infections to other organs for 2 plus vaccine dosed. Completely in agreement with this reinfection data.
COVID was scam-plandemic with ulterior-motives from the get go…. Depopulation campaign, control and taking away of our “Natural Rights”! Humanity needs to wake up!
#GeorigaGuideStones the people are fighting back… finally!
How long before a guy that is an “expert on data” slides into the comments to tell us that we need more data?
Why did they not differentiate between 2, 3, 4 doses??
I suppose this is a good place to comment that -- every single member of our nursing team -- has been out positive in the last week.
Aside from what it's doing to the immune system, there's also the mystery of the brain:
https://medquotes.substack.com/p/rosy-prospects
What an awful, awful study.
Lumping 0-1 and 2-3 shots for one thing
If you look at data only 4 had just 1 shot.
And how do they adjust from-a odds ratio of 0.92 to 1.4 ?
Also, they assume positive PCR test result as reinfection. No mention of Ct value to define positivity. Anything over 30 is garbage
Anyways, it gives a good result but it can be picked apart
The vaccines were supposed to stop transmission. That was BS and we all knew it. Then it was supposed to prevent infection. Same result. Then it was supposed to reduce 'severe disease' or outcomes. Dud. It may have helped prevent death and hospitalizations in the beginning but that lasted about 15 minutes. Now the claim is it's better to have hybrid protection. Total BS. Logic dictates natural immunity is better. Another claim is the vaccinated spread the disease less than the unvaccinated. They also aid the spike didn't leave the site of injection. That turned out to be wrong. It ended up in the heart and ovaries. They also said the spike was safe.
The funny part is this magic new formula they plan to roll out again spots for the original strain. Why? Can anyone explain this to me?
It's all junk and bunk.
It's all garbage.