Yes, “paradoxical” is the right word according to French doctor Nicole Delépine: “Since vaccination, in all the countries implemented with a large vaccination program, there is a reversal of the trend, with a significant increase in the frequency of invasive cancers in the most vaccinated groups.”
I think the challenge now is for someone to show efficacy for any vaccine. I'm not "anti-vax", but the trend towards these "miracles of science" being shown to do more harm than good is becoming overwhelmingly evident. I'm sure there are good preventative medications, and before the industry implodes under the weight of all its lies, it would be nice to have something positive come from all their work.
The best way to prevent cervical cancer are yearly PAP smears. Women will neglect this with the vaccine on board. Having experienced this myself, I can attest to the importance of PAP smears and the dangers of the vaccine. as with all vaccines. Cervical cancers are rare and with proper diagnoses and treatment, it can be eradicated.
I started doing Pap smears about 20+ years ago. At that time the Teen Clinic I worked in was doing Pap Smears on adolescents aged 13 to 18 who were sexually active and wanted birth control.
We had quite a few ASCUS ( Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance). The HPV tests were not available at that time, not for another decade or so.
The guidelines said Colposcopy and that was an insane challenge to get figured out and paid for by our Teen Clinic.
After a few years of that, studies were showing that most ASCUS Pap smear results in teens went back to normal in a year or so, indicating their immune system had done it’s job and cleared the HPV that was probably a root cause of the abnormal results.
The guidelines on Pap smears was then changed, recognizing that we were doing more harm than good to ignore the robust response of a healthy immune system.
I think that the vaccine indirectly places selection pressure on the virus, which then does an end run and “ selects” a different strain not covered in the vaccine, and still goes on causing cervical cell changes that are serious in a very small subset of the population.
I think we would do better to study who is that vulnerable subset of the population, and how to effectively bolster their immune response, because creating an effective immune surveillance is probably more efficacious for patients , than forever chasing Mother Nature’s with endless upgrades to booster HPV doses.
I noticed that the TV ads for the HPV jab now state, (in small print, of course) that most of these viruses 'clear on their own'. this is something that the 'vaccine risk aware' biomed community has been talking about since the introduction of these jabs. duh.
Merck must be counting on the public's tendency to 'tune out' the little CYA add-ons and instead, focus on the emotional tugs of the ad (which now feature younger and younger kids, ugh). consumers of pharma products have long ago tuned out the 'serious side effects & life threatening infections may occur' stuff as so much background noise.
I remember that their print ad used to state (in small print). 'your health care provider may ask you to lie down. fainting and shaking have been known to occur immediately after the injection.' Helllllloooo... they are describing a seizure. that's a seizure! Merck's advertising folks knew better than to use the word 'seizure', therefore they just describe it. sounds pretty benign, right? just like you're not supposed to pay attention to the fact that 'most clear on their own'. you're only supposed to hear the 'cancer' part.
I suspect the HPV vaccine, like the polio vaccine, is an example of misdirected target fixation on the wrong target. As poliomyelitis is evidently NOT infectious; and the evidence of increasing cervical cancer rates following the HPV vaccine coming into use indicate the impact of HPV on cervical cancer is grossly overrated, at best, and perhaps completely off base. And so it goes...
Please can someone tell me why the following is not mentioned as well.
Vitamin-D3 campaigns were ongoing in Scotland at the same time as the HPV 'vaccine' was being tested and the improvement may be the result of the Vitamin-D3 status increase in the population.
I listed your substack article on the dangers of HPV vaccines. Someone objected. And I replied
========================================
Exulansic is a speech disorder therapist who treats a lot of autistic children and is thoroughly opposed to gender affirming surgeries for young people. On her substack, she documents the adverse reactions to surgeries and drugs commonly prescribed to transition even young children.
Recently she documented the case of a male trans woman who developed penis cancer in his surgically created vagina (created from penile tissue). She warned that his cancer could have been avoided if he could only have taken HPV vaccine.
Learn4ever: Diana, I don't think you could have chosen a more questionable source for medical information than James Lyons-Weller. He is anti-science to his bones, and a dangerous peddler of disinformation. It took me about 30 seconds on his site to confirm that fact.
MY REPLY:
Please share the unscientific medical information. you so quickly identified so that we can make a better informed decision. I know Dr. Jack personally. He is dedicated to studying science and has founded an online university called Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (https://ipak-edu.org) He taught us last week in his course "How to Read a Scientific Study" that we must not jump to conclusions. Vaccines are not always "unavoidably unsafe" as Reagan acknowledged when he gave them liability from all lawsuits in 1987.Dr. Lyons-Weiler told us, that with proper testing, we can discriminate those who would have vaccine adverse events so that they don't have to take vaccines and die or become disabled. ALSO the vaccines themselves can be made safe or safer by eliminating toxic minerals such as mercury (Thimerosal) and aluminum. He is not going to throw out the baby with the bath water. He has worked for several universities helping them plan their scientific studies. He is a peer reviewer for medical journals. He listed many published scientific papers that agree with his critique of HPV vaccine. I would trust him with my own life.
I guess you created a monster when you allowed me to take all those IPAK-EDU courses!
Yes, “paradoxical” is the right word according to French doctor Nicole Delépine: “Since vaccination, in all the countries implemented with a large vaccination program, there is a reversal of the trend, with a significant increase in the frequency of invasive cancers in the most vaccinated groups.”
http://docteur.nicoledelepine.fr/paradoxical-effect-of-anti-hpv-vaccine-gardasil-on-cervical-cancer-rate/
I think the challenge now is for someone to show efficacy for any vaccine. I'm not "anti-vax", but the trend towards these "miracles of science" being shown to do more harm than good is becoming overwhelmingly evident. I'm sure there are good preventative medications, and before the industry implodes under the weight of all its lies, it would be nice to have something positive come from all their work.
The best way to prevent cervical cancer are yearly PAP smears. Women will neglect this with the vaccine on board. Having experienced this myself, I can attest to the importance of PAP smears and the dangers of the vaccine. as with all vaccines. Cervical cancers are rare and with proper diagnoses and treatment, it can be eradicated.
I started doing Pap smears about 20+ years ago. At that time the Teen Clinic I worked in was doing Pap Smears on adolescents aged 13 to 18 who were sexually active and wanted birth control.
We had quite a few ASCUS ( Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance). The HPV tests were not available at that time, not for another decade or so.
The guidelines said Colposcopy and that was an insane challenge to get figured out and paid for by our Teen Clinic.
After a few years of that, studies were showing that most ASCUS Pap smear results in teens went back to normal in a year or so, indicating their immune system had done it’s job and cleared the HPV that was probably a root cause of the abnormal results.
The guidelines on Pap smears was then changed, recognizing that we were doing more harm than good to ignore the robust response of a healthy immune system.
I think that the vaccine indirectly places selection pressure on the virus, which then does an end run and “ selects” a different strain not covered in the vaccine, and still goes on causing cervical cell changes that are serious in a very small subset of the population.
I think we would do better to study who is that vulnerable subset of the population, and how to effectively bolster their immune response, because creating an effective immune surveillance is probably more efficacious for patients , than forever chasing Mother Nature’s with endless upgrades to booster HPV doses.
I noticed that the TV ads for the HPV jab now state, (in small print, of course) that most of these viruses 'clear on their own'. this is something that the 'vaccine risk aware' biomed community has been talking about since the introduction of these jabs. duh.
Merck must be counting on the public's tendency to 'tune out' the little CYA add-ons and instead, focus on the emotional tugs of the ad (which now feature younger and younger kids, ugh). consumers of pharma products have long ago tuned out the 'serious side effects & life threatening infections may occur' stuff as so much background noise.
I remember that their print ad used to state (in small print). 'your health care provider may ask you to lie down. fainting and shaking have been known to occur immediately after the injection.' Helllllloooo... they are describing a seizure. that's a seizure! Merck's advertising folks knew better than to use the word 'seizure', therefore they just describe it. sounds pretty benign, right? just like you're not supposed to pay attention to the fact that 'most clear on their own'. you're only supposed to hear the 'cancer' part.
I suspect the HPV vaccine, like the polio vaccine, is an example of misdirected target fixation on the wrong target. As poliomyelitis is evidently NOT infectious; and the evidence of increasing cervical cancer rates following the HPV vaccine coming into use indicate the impact of HPV on cervical cancer is grossly overrated, at best, and perhaps completely off base. And so it goes...
Please can someone tell me why the following is not mentioned as well.
Vitamin-D3 campaigns were ongoing in Scotland at the same time as the HPV 'vaccine' was being tested and the improvement may be the result of the Vitamin-D3 status increase in the population.
https://www.bmj.com/content/365/bmj.l1375/rr-4
Alex Vasques is here on SubStack as well and has more information to share.
I listed your substack article on the dangers of HPV vaccines. Someone objected. And I replied
========================================
Exulansic is a speech disorder therapist who treats a lot of autistic children and is thoroughly opposed to gender affirming surgeries for young people. On her substack, she documents the adverse reactions to surgeries and drugs commonly prescribed to transition even young children.
Recently she documented the case of a male trans woman who developed penis cancer in his surgically created vagina (created from penile tissue). She warned that his cancer could have been avoided if he could only have taken HPV vaccine.
https://exulansic.substack.com/p/trans-woman-with-a-vagina-somehow/comments#comment-52873321
Dr. James Lyons-Weiler believes the hpv vaccine is not effective in preventing cervical cancer. He sites other medical papers supporting his view. https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/important-reads-will-hpv-vaccination?utm_source=%2Fsearch%2Fhpv&utm_medium=reader2
Learn4ever: Diana, I don't think you could have chosen a more questionable source for medical information than James Lyons-Weller. He is anti-science to his bones, and a dangerous peddler of disinformation. It took me about 30 seconds on his site to confirm that fact.
MY REPLY:
Please share the unscientific medical information. you so quickly identified so that we can make a better informed decision. I know Dr. Jack personally. He is dedicated to studying science and has founded an online university called Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (https://ipak-edu.org) He taught us last week in his course "How to Read a Scientific Study" that we must not jump to conclusions. Vaccines are not always "unavoidably unsafe" as Reagan acknowledged when he gave them liability from all lawsuits in 1987.Dr. Lyons-Weiler told us, that with proper testing, we can discriminate those who would have vaccine adverse events so that they don't have to take vaccines and die or become disabled. ALSO the vaccines themselves can be made safe or safer by eliminating toxic minerals such as mercury (Thimerosal) and aluminum. He is not going to throw out the baby with the bath water. He has worked for several universities helping them plan their scientific studies. He is a peer reviewer for medical journals. He listed many published scientific papers that agree with his critique of HPV vaccine. I would trust him with my own life.
I guess you created a monster when you allowed me to take all those IPAK-EDU courses!