Yes, “paradoxical” is the right word according to French doctor Nicole Delépine: “Since vaccination, in all the countries implemented with a large vaccination program, there is a reversal of the trend, with a significant increase in the frequency of invasive cancers in the most vaccinated groups.”
I won't say they all have zero benefits, as a few of them, such as the measles and varicella vaccines, evidently offer temporary protection against coming down with the disease against which they are supped to protect. But at a cost of some level of impairment, especially regarding broad spectrum immunity.
Some, such as the HPV and polio vaccines, are strictly harmful and utter SCAMS, the diseases evidently not being infectious in the first place.
There is NOT ONE vaccine that is proven to be safe and effective, in the history of vaccines.
Read "Turtles all the way down", for example.
Also, there are at least 3 studies which compared the vaccinated vs unvaccinated population, and show that the vaxxed have at least 10x at much chronic diseases, than the unvaxxed. Including diseases they were supposed to be protected from..
Why do you think no study that attempts to prove the efficiency of a vaccine, uses a real control group (an unvaccinated group) but instead, it compares with another group, vaccinated with a previous vaccine?
Indeed, the reason placebos haven't been used (except for the COVID jabs) is that none can be proven to be safe AND effective.
But what good comes of exaggerating the case, as the true vax believers do? That just makes one look like another type of true believer who refuses to acknowledge any evidence that contradicts said beliefs.
My opinions follow the evidence, not the other way around. And the evidence does indicate the measles vaccine helped bring the rate to near zero. BUT the NET effect has been completely swept under the rug, and so obscured it cannot be evaluated - just as intended by those who profit from the current epidemic of chronic illness and increased vulnerability to other diseases.
Most people have target fixation, and that's how the COVID jab scam was perpetrated. Never mind the higher death rate and worse overall outcomes of the jab group.
The thing is, germ theory is false. So if germs don't cause disease, no vaccine can ever be effective against a 'germ'.
So if you start looking into the clinical trials that claim to have proven a vaccine efficacy, they are all flawed, fake or forged. Every single one of them.
@Marius You have a very high burden of proof to justify your claim "germ theory is false". There are numerous industrial applications that make use of the germ theory to produce results that can easily be observed even by lay people. Sure one can believe the counter narrative that wants to divide the medical freedom movement into as many fragments as possible but to repeat counter narrative propaganda as a ward against facts is a odd way of living life.
Many things are fake and lies but focus on those and not on the things that are provable and accepted facts.
Drink lots water from a fairly unpolluted stream, and get back with me. I've studied biology, both in an academic setting, and more so independently.
Above all, I trust my own observations of how illnesses spread, and they are definitely consistent with many diseases being caused by pathogenic microbes. And the means of shutting them down were also consistent with the germ theory.
But it is also apparent that some diseases that are commonly believed to be infectious are evidently not, most notably, poliomyelitis (now variously named). But even if it were true that no diseases are infectious, and all viruses are just "exosomes" or whatever one wants to call them, it does not advance medical freedom one bit to make the argument, but just sets up easy straw men for vaccine believers to destroy.
I think the challenge now is for someone to show efficacy for any vaccine. I'm not "anti-vax", but the trend towards these "miracles of science" being shown to do more harm than good is becoming overwhelmingly evident. I'm sure there are good preventative medications, and before the industry implodes under the weight of all its lies, it would be nice to have something positive come from all their work.
This is a very thoughtful and level-headed comment, thanks for posting.
If I may, I would like to challenge you on just one point:
"... and before the industry implodes under the weight of all its lies, ..."
There doesn't seem to be any expectation for this to ever eventuate. The entire industry is a creation and mainstay of the Rockefeller imperium over the world which, by virtue of it either majorly or fully-creating and still dominating the United Nations, the World Health Organization, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, Planned Parenthood and many other organizations, is still preeminent in the plans of these organizations and entities.
Moreover, the pharmaceutical industry is a cornerstone of the combined efforts also of the Carnegie, Bill&Melinda Gates, and Ford Foundations, and so many others, and most substantively through the gargantuan asset managers including BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street, which represent the capital of the globocap-oiler-banker-owner-investors (GOBOI), and the investment banks, and venture capital firms, the expectation is, if not greater, then at least continued levels of activity and profit generation. Needless to say, all these many predatory capital entities and the old and new money aristocracies whom they represent or serve, are expanding the role of Big Pharma and its pernicious penetration into the existence of the remaining human population (that is, remaining after the approaching waves of disease, war, and famine), when the hapless survivors will have imposed on them the GOBOI's advancing global new world order, the multipolar International Monetary and Financial System (IMFS) and the Synthetic Hegemonic Currency (SHC), and the GOBOI will finally have the power to enforce full-compliance with pharmaceutical decrees with the fully-entrenched and operating SHC.
rightly questioning everything that goes into your body doesn't make you 'anti' anything. all of us so-called 'anti' folks are really just informed consent folks. we, by and large, don't aim to wipe vaccines off the face of the planet. we don't claim to want to dictate others' medical decisions. and we don't want others to dictate ours. if we're 'anti' anything, its 'anti' lies and coercion.
Very well stated. A few evidently have efficacy for their intended purpose, but I'm certainly not convinced any are a good bet for anyone, all factors considered.
Measles definitely declined sharply following the measles vaccine, though the death rate was 1 in 400,000 per year in the US and trending to 0 when it came into use. So it was trending toward being something like a typical flu bug or the common cold.
But its near eradication came at a trade-off of what are evidently greater rates of death and disability from the poisons in it, and increased susceptibility to other diseases due to what one might call misdirected target fixation of the immune system.
There is no free lunch when it comes to messing with one's immune system.
But on the other hand, proper immune system support evidently has no down side. As for prevention, simple measures such as keeping up one's nutritional status, especially vitamin D and C levels, have much greater efficacy than any vaccine. Full-on nutritional measures such as the Brownstein protocol, if implemented early on, have shown many times greater efficacy against illness than any pharmaceutical measures.
Which is why they are not allowed to be publicized, and none of the pharma controlled legacy journals will publish any legitimate research about them, only rigged designer studies crafted to fail and "prove they have no scientific support", such as by using much too low of dosages.
The best way to prevent cervical cancer are yearly PAP smears. Women will neglect this with the vaccine on board. Having experienced this myself, I can attest to the importance of PAP smears and the dangers of the vaccine. as with all vaccines. Cervical cancers are rare and with proper diagnoses and treatment, it can be eradicated.
I started doing Pap smears about 20+ years ago. At that time the Teen Clinic I worked in was doing Pap Smears on adolescents aged 13 to 18 who were sexually active and wanted birth control.
We had quite a few ASCUS ( Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance). The HPV tests were not available at that time, not for another decade or so.
The guidelines said Colposcopy and that was an insane challenge to get figured out and paid for by our Teen Clinic.
After a few years of that, studies were showing that most ASCUS Pap smear results in teens went back to normal in a year or so, indicating their immune system had done it’s job and cleared the HPV that was probably a root cause of the abnormal results.
The guidelines on Pap smears was then changed, recognizing that we were doing more harm than good to ignore the robust response of a healthy immune system.
I think that the vaccine indirectly places selection pressure on the virus, which then does an end run and “ selects” a different strain not covered in the vaccine, and still goes on causing cervical cell changes that are serious in a very small subset of the population.
I think we would do better to study who is that vulnerable subset of the population, and how to effectively bolster their immune response, because creating an effective immune surveillance is probably more efficacious for patients , than forever chasing Mother Nature’s with endless upgrades to booster HPV doses.
I noticed that the TV ads for the HPV jab now state, (in small print, of course) that most of these viruses 'clear on their own'. this is something that the 'vaccine risk aware' biomed community has been talking about since the introduction of these jabs. duh.
Merck must be counting on the public's tendency to 'tune out' the little CYA add-ons and instead, focus on the emotional tugs of the ad (which now feature younger and younger kids, ugh). consumers of pharma products have long ago tuned out the 'serious side effects & life threatening infections may occur' stuff as so much background noise.
I remember that their print ad used to state (in small print). 'your health care provider may ask you to lie down. fainting and shaking have been known to occur immediately after the injection.' Helllllloooo... they are describing a seizure. that's a seizure! Merck's advertising folks knew better than to use the word 'seizure', therefore they just describe it. sounds pretty benign, right? just like you're not supposed to pay attention to the fact that 'most clear on their own'. you're only supposed to hear the 'cancer' part.
I suspect the HPV vaccine, like the polio vaccine, is an example of misdirected target fixation on the wrong target. As poliomyelitis is evidently NOT infectious; and the evidence of increasing cervical cancer rates following the HPV vaccine coming into use indicate the impact of HPV on cervical cancer is grossly overrated, at best, and perhaps completely off base. And so it goes...
Please can someone tell me why the following is not mentioned as well.
Vitamin-D3 campaigns were ongoing in Scotland at the same time as the HPV 'vaccine' was being tested and the improvement may be the result of the Vitamin-D3 status increase in the population.
I listed your substack article on the dangers of HPV vaccines. Someone objected. And I replied
========================================
Exulansic is a speech disorder therapist who treats a lot of autistic children and is thoroughly opposed to gender affirming surgeries for young people. On her substack, she documents the adverse reactions to surgeries and drugs commonly prescribed to transition even young children.
Recently she documented the case of a male trans woman who developed penis cancer in his surgically created vagina (created from penile tissue). She warned that his cancer could have been avoided if he could only have taken HPV vaccine.
Learn4ever: Diana, I don't think you could have chosen a more questionable source for medical information than James Lyons-Weller. He is anti-science to his bones, and a dangerous peddler of disinformation. It took me about 30 seconds on his site to confirm that fact.
MY REPLY:
Please share the unscientific medical information. you so quickly identified so that we can make a better informed decision. I know Dr. Jack personally. He is dedicated to studying science and has founded an online university called Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (https://ipak-edu.org) He taught us last week in his course "How to Read a Scientific Study" that we must not jump to conclusions. Vaccines are not always "unavoidably unsafe" as Reagan acknowledged when he gave them liability from all lawsuits in 1987.Dr. Lyons-Weiler told us, that with proper testing, we can discriminate those who would have vaccine adverse events so that they don't have to take vaccines and die or become disabled. ALSO the vaccines themselves can be made safe or safer by eliminating toxic minerals such as mercury (Thimerosal) and aluminum. He is not going to throw out the baby with the bath water. He has worked for several universities helping them plan their scientific studies. He is a peer reviewer for medical journals. He listed many published scientific papers that agree with his critique of HPV vaccine. I would trust him with my own life.
I guess you created a monster when you allowed me to take all those IPAK-EDU courses!
What an odd comment. It's more than reasonable. Just look at all of these "POS"s citing this article in 2022 and 2023... https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=6774918777525756685&as_sdt=80000005&sciodt=0,23
Yes, “paradoxical” is the right word according to French doctor Nicole Delépine: “Since vaccination, in all the countries implemented with a large vaccination program, there is a reversal of the trend, with a significant increase in the frequency of invasive cancers in the most vaccinated groups.”
http://docteur.nicoledelepine.fr/paradoxical-effect-of-anti-hpv-vaccine-gardasil-on-cervical-cancer-rate/
It is a paradox, if one believes the narrative (that vaccines are beneficial).
They're not beneficial, they have ZERO benefits, and they are all harmful and toxic.
I won't say they all have zero benefits, as a few of them, such as the measles and varicella vaccines, evidently offer temporary protection against coming down with the disease against which they are supped to protect. But at a cost of some level of impairment, especially regarding broad spectrum immunity.
Some, such as the HPV and polio vaccines, are strictly harmful and utter SCAMS, the diseases evidently not being infectious in the first place.
They have ZERO benefits.
There is NOT ONE vaccine that is proven to be safe and effective, in the history of vaccines.
Read "Turtles all the way down", for example.
Also, there are at least 3 studies which compared the vaccinated vs unvaccinated population, and show that the vaxxed have at least 10x at much chronic diseases, than the unvaxxed. Including diseases they were supposed to be protected from..
https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/vaxx-v-unvaxx-your-children-an-ounce?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=tq9u1
Why do you think no study that attempts to prove the efficiency of a vaccine, uses a real control group (an unvaccinated group) but instead, it compares with another group, vaccinated with a previous vaccine?
Think, it's not hard..
Indeed, the reason placebos haven't been used (except for the COVID jabs) is that none can be proven to be safe AND effective.
But what good comes of exaggerating the case, as the true vax believers do? That just makes one look like another type of true believer who refuses to acknowledge any evidence that contradicts said beliefs.
My opinions follow the evidence, not the other way around. And the evidence does indicate the measles vaccine helped bring the rate to near zero. BUT the NET effect has been completely swept under the rug, and so obscured it cannot be evaluated - just as intended by those who profit from the current epidemic of chronic illness and increased vulnerability to other diseases.
Most people have target fixation, and that's how the COVID jab scam was perpetrated. Never mind the higher death rate and worse overall outcomes of the jab group.
The thing is, germ theory is false. So if germs don't cause disease, no vaccine can ever be effective against a 'germ'.
So if you start looking into the clinical trials that claim to have proven a vaccine efficacy, they are all flawed, fake or forged. Every single one of them.
@Marius You have a very high burden of proof to justify your claim "germ theory is false". There are numerous industrial applications that make use of the germ theory to produce results that can easily be observed even by lay people. Sure one can believe the counter narrative that wants to divide the medical freedom movement into as many fragments as possible but to repeat counter narrative propaganda as a ward against facts is a odd way of living life.
Many things are fake and lies but focus on those and not on the things that are provable and accepted facts.
Drink lots water from a fairly unpolluted stream, and get back with me. I've studied biology, both in an academic setting, and more so independently.
Above all, I trust my own observations of how illnesses spread, and they are definitely consistent with many diseases being caused by pathogenic microbes. And the means of shutting them down were also consistent with the germ theory.
But it is also apparent that some diseases that are commonly believed to be infectious are evidently not, most notably, poliomyelitis (now variously named). But even if it were true that no diseases are infectious, and all viruses are just "exosomes" or whatever one wants to call them, it does not advance medical freedom one bit to make the argument, but just sets up easy straw men for vaccine believers to destroy.
I'll take "Miracle Drugs" category for 35 Billion dollars.
I think the challenge now is for someone to show efficacy for any vaccine. I'm not "anti-vax", but the trend towards these "miracles of science" being shown to do more harm than good is becoming overwhelmingly evident. I'm sure there are good preventative medications, and before the industry implodes under the weight of all its lies, it would be nice to have something positive come from all their work.
This is a very thoughtful and level-headed comment, thanks for posting.
If I may, I would like to challenge you on just one point:
"... and before the industry implodes under the weight of all its lies, ..."
There doesn't seem to be any expectation for this to ever eventuate. The entire industry is a creation and mainstay of the Rockefeller imperium over the world which, by virtue of it either majorly or fully-creating and still dominating the United Nations, the World Health Organization, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, Planned Parenthood and many other organizations, is still preeminent in the plans of these organizations and entities.
Moreover, the pharmaceutical industry is a cornerstone of the combined efforts also of the Carnegie, Bill&Melinda Gates, and Ford Foundations, and so many others, and most substantively through the gargantuan asset managers including BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street, which represent the capital of the globocap-oiler-banker-owner-investors (GOBOI), and the investment banks, and venture capital firms, the expectation is, if not greater, then at least continued levels of activity and profit generation. Needless to say, all these many predatory capital entities and the old and new money aristocracies whom they represent or serve, are expanding the role of Big Pharma and its pernicious penetration into the existence of the remaining human population (that is, remaining after the approaching waves of disease, war, and famine), when the hapless survivors will have imposed on them the GOBOI's advancing global new world order, the multipolar International Monetary and Financial System (IMFS) and the Synthetic Hegemonic Currency (SHC), and the GOBOI will finally have the power to enforce full-compliance with pharmaceutical decrees with the fully-entrenched and operating SHC.
rightly questioning everything that goes into your body doesn't make you 'anti' anything. all of us so-called 'anti' folks are really just informed consent folks. we, by and large, don't aim to wipe vaccines off the face of the planet. we don't claim to want to dictate others' medical decisions. and we don't want others to dictate ours. if we're 'anti' anything, its 'anti' lies and coercion.
Very well stated. A few evidently have efficacy for their intended purpose, but I'm certainly not convinced any are a good bet for anyone, all factors considered.
Measles definitely declined sharply following the measles vaccine, though the death rate was 1 in 400,000 per year in the US and trending to 0 when it came into use. So it was trending toward being something like a typical flu bug or the common cold.
But its near eradication came at a trade-off of what are evidently greater rates of death and disability from the poisons in it, and increased susceptibility to other diseases due to what one might call misdirected target fixation of the immune system.
There is no free lunch when it comes to messing with one's immune system.
But on the other hand, proper immune system support evidently has no down side. As for prevention, simple measures such as keeping up one's nutritional status, especially vitamin D and C levels, have much greater efficacy than any vaccine. Full-on nutritional measures such as the Brownstein protocol, if implemented early on, have shown many times greater efficacy against illness than any pharmaceutical measures.
Which is why they are not allowed to be publicized, and none of the pharma controlled legacy journals will publish any legitimate research about them, only rigged designer studies crafted to fail and "prove they have no scientific support", such as by using much too low of dosages.
The best way to prevent cervical cancer are yearly PAP smears. Women will neglect this with the vaccine on board. Having experienced this myself, I can attest to the importance of PAP smears and the dangers of the vaccine. as with all vaccines. Cervical cancers are rare and with proper diagnoses and treatment, it can be eradicated.
I started doing Pap smears about 20+ years ago. At that time the Teen Clinic I worked in was doing Pap Smears on adolescents aged 13 to 18 who were sexually active and wanted birth control.
We had quite a few ASCUS ( Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance). The HPV tests were not available at that time, not for another decade or so.
The guidelines said Colposcopy and that was an insane challenge to get figured out and paid for by our Teen Clinic.
After a few years of that, studies were showing that most ASCUS Pap smear results in teens went back to normal in a year or so, indicating their immune system had done it’s job and cleared the HPV that was probably a root cause of the abnormal results.
The guidelines on Pap smears was then changed, recognizing that we were doing more harm than good to ignore the robust response of a healthy immune system.
I think that the vaccine indirectly places selection pressure on the virus, which then does an end run and “ selects” a different strain not covered in the vaccine, and still goes on causing cervical cell changes that are serious in a very small subset of the population.
I think we would do better to study who is that vulnerable subset of the population, and how to effectively bolster their immune response, because creating an effective immune surveillance is probably more efficacious for patients , than forever chasing Mother Nature’s with endless upgrades to booster HPV doses.
See my comment above about Alex Vasques and Vitamin-D3 in Scotland.
I noticed that the TV ads for the HPV jab now state, (in small print, of course) that most of these viruses 'clear on their own'. this is something that the 'vaccine risk aware' biomed community has been talking about since the introduction of these jabs. duh.
Merck must be counting on the public's tendency to 'tune out' the little CYA add-ons and instead, focus on the emotional tugs of the ad (which now feature younger and younger kids, ugh). consumers of pharma products have long ago tuned out the 'serious side effects & life threatening infections may occur' stuff as so much background noise.
I remember that their print ad used to state (in small print). 'your health care provider may ask you to lie down. fainting and shaking have been known to occur immediately after the injection.' Helllllloooo... they are describing a seizure. that's a seizure! Merck's advertising folks knew better than to use the word 'seizure', therefore they just describe it. sounds pretty benign, right? just like you're not supposed to pay attention to the fact that 'most clear on their own'. you're only supposed to hear the 'cancer' part.
I suspect the HPV vaccine, like the polio vaccine, is an example of misdirected target fixation on the wrong target. As poliomyelitis is evidently NOT infectious; and the evidence of increasing cervical cancer rates following the HPV vaccine coming into use indicate the impact of HPV on cervical cancer is grossly overrated, at best, and perhaps completely off base. And so it goes...
Please can someone tell me why the following is not mentioned as well.
Vitamin-D3 campaigns were ongoing in Scotland at the same time as the HPV 'vaccine' was being tested and the improvement may be the result of the Vitamin-D3 status increase in the population.
https://www.bmj.com/content/365/bmj.l1375/rr-4
Alex Vasques is here on SubStack as well and has more information to share.
I listed your substack article on the dangers of HPV vaccines. Someone objected. And I replied
========================================
Exulansic is a speech disorder therapist who treats a lot of autistic children and is thoroughly opposed to gender affirming surgeries for young people. On her substack, she documents the adverse reactions to surgeries and drugs commonly prescribed to transition even young children.
Recently she documented the case of a male trans woman who developed penis cancer in his surgically created vagina (created from penile tissue). She warned that his cancer could have been avoided if he could only have taken HPV vaccine.
https://exulansic.substack.com/p/trans-woman-with-a-vagina-somehow/comments#comment-52873321
Dr. James Lyons-Weiler believes the hpv vaccine is not effective in preventing cervical cancer. He sites other medical papers supporting his view. https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/important-reads-will-hpv-vaccination?utm_source=%2Fsearch%2Fhpv&utm_medium=reader2
Learn4ever: Diana, I don't think you could have chosen a more questionable source for medical information than James Lyons-Weller. He is anti-science to his bones, and a dangerous peddler of disinformation. It took me about 30 seconds on his site to confirm that fact.
MY REPLY:
Please share the unscientific medical information. you so quickly identified so that we can make a better informed decision. I know Dr. Jack personally. He is dedicated to studying science and has founded an online university called Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (https://ipak-edu.org) He taught us last week in his course "How to Read a Scientific Study" that we must not jump to conclusions. Vaccines are not always "unavoidably unsafe" as Reagan acknowledged when he gave them liability from all lawsuits in 1987.Dr. Lyons-Weiler told us, that with proper testing, we can discriminate those who would have vaccine adverse events so that they don't have to take vaccines and die or become disabled. ALSO the vaccines themselves can be made safe or safer by eliminating toxic minerals such as mercury (Thimerosal) and aluminum. He is not going to throw out the baby with the bath water. He has worked for several universities helping them plan their scientific studies. He is a peer reviewer for medical journals. He listed many published scientific papers that agree with his critique of HPV vaccine. I would trust him with my own life.
I guess you created a monster when you allowed me to take all those IPAK-EDU courses!