This is an incredibly thoughtful and thorough piece of writing that anyone can grasp. My friend knows Doherty personally and shamed me for not getting the EUA cov-19 therapy. I wish people would consider the precautionary principle and good health over reckless ‘growth model medicine’.
The sense of stampeding insanity and recklessness, coupled with actual governmental and "establishment" pressure, incentives, and coercion, are part of a campaign, obviously. It is the campaign described cryptically--but pretty clearly once you begin to recognize it--in the Apocalypse.
It is the First Horseman's campaign, he who goes forth "conquering and to conquer". All four are riding now, imo, but not yet at a full gallop.
Having been down a particular rabbit hole I'm curious how effective direct challenge experiments even are? I'm under the impression that the history of actual transmission in experimentation is tenuous where most of the time instead of any sort of natural route of infection the methodology has to fall back on directly injecting a mixed solution into subjects. One example was in trying to reliably reproduce polio transmission in monkeys they ended up removing their tonsils and exposing them that way...or something along those lines back in the day. that in the spanish flu they couldn't get subjects sick even with direct exposure. That the reason scientists scoff at mothers superstitions of catching a cold from being cold is because in experimentation transmission could not reliably be produced despite reproducing being cold. That even as recently as with covid mouse studies, the infection part of the experiment wasn't left to normal routes of transmission but a solution was injected directly into the mice. I wouldn't mind reading more about this particular challenge in the science of reproducing transmission at all.
An article worthy of full publication in every outlet in the nation. I'll share it in and outside our visible globe, an Aplus writing tht needs to be told.. Thank you for writing it.
After WW II, it’s been my wondering why only the Nuremberg “CODES” were established instead of worldwide, enforceable “ L A W S “ for accountability-with-consequences. Considering the absolutely evil intentions for war and human, medical destructions, I’m fairly certain this was an INTENTION to enable an ‘emotional loophole’ beyond ‘victors’ and ‘losers’ to both appease yet enable the CONtinuation of medical atrocities WITHOUT direct, enforced LAWS. So, the mindsets CONtinued as disingenuous “re$earch” until the COVID-19 fear campaigns were injected across the Created FLAT EARTH realm without accountability for lies supporting the CRIMES still being executed. This is CONtinuing as the UN’s W.H.O. pushes for absolute Power, Profit and CONtrol through their deceptive, “Pandemic ‘Treaty’“ cloaking Worldwide Health Tyranny after May 2024 … unless STOPPED now.
Seems COVID-1984 was more a “practice run” to condition or WAKE UP humans to either remain or prevent ‘lab rats’ from locking or destroying the cages of fear and greed of War$ FOR Big HARM-US-see$.
wow, it boggles my mind that more people aren't freaking out on this particular 'study' method. do they really think that young people are not going to transmit whatever disease unintentionally?? more proof that the vast majority of professional 'ethicists' (when a human trait becomes a profession is weird to start with) are obviously bought and paid for, with nary a question raised.
it sounds like they are normalizing this concept (infected intentionally) so that later on, when more and more people are deliberately impoverished, it will be considered normal and moral to sell your body this way. its very different than homeless addicts selling their blood, as I'm sure the proponents will try to play it this way. you watch, they will sell it like its some generous and moral opportunity.
This practice seems to be based on the germ theory and the profit desires of pharmacological manufacturers. People willing to sell their lives for minimum wage are a tragic comment on civilization. As is the willingness of Pharma to profit from it. This is massively immoral.
My comment on germ theory is based on the undisputed belief in a drug to cure a disease. These “researchers” are not trying to understand the nature of disease: its requirements for an unbalanced host and ways in which to rebalance the host thereby reinstating health.
No, this practice consumes volunteers. It is monstrous.
All too many writers and speakers are giving wiggle room for criminality to be excused with phrases like “… APPEAR to have all but been FORGOTTEN … “
My recommendation for this slip-sliding-hiding away language is to read and marinade their brain with Margaret Anna Alice’s crisp writing of “Mistakes Were NOT Made ; An Anthem for Justice” Found at :
This Human Challenge project has been brewing in the background for years thanks to the usual players.
The Doherty Clinical Trial fact sheet refrences WHO 2016 working group report (which dates back to 2014), a 2018 Lancet paper and good old Wellcome Trust 2022 meeting. The latter meeting had representation from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Bill and Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute in USA (I wasn't aware of that one!)). They all were discussing the Human Challenge Trials.
------2014 During the "Decade of Vaccines"
"The proposal to prepare WHO guidance on human challenge trials was developed during a WHO Consultation on clinical evaluation of vaccines held in Geneva, Switzerland, 17–18 July 2014", backed by the global regulators.
Know this: there are no "cure trials." Cured is not medically defined for most diseases, including COVID - and as a result "cured" cannot be tested and proven. Nobody cares about cures. Cures are simply not profitable. A cure can only be sold to someone who has the disease and if it works, it can only be sold once. "Preventatives are more profitable than cures." - because they don't require the disease. There's lots of money in preparation.
I have no words left it feels like. It’s (aka “they”) all too topsy-turvy and insane! I will of course keep sharing and shouting but…
This is an incredibly thoughtful and thorough piece of writing that anyone can grasp. My friend knows Doherty personally and shamed me for not getting the EUA cov-19 therapy. I wish people would consider the precautionary principle and good health over reckless ‘growth model medicine’.
The sense of stampeding insanity and recklessness, coupled with actual governmental and "establishment" pressure, incentives, and coercion, are part of a campaign, obviously. It is the campaign described cryptically--but pretty clearly once you begin to recognize it--in the Apocalypse.
It is the First Horseman's campaign, he who goes forth "conquering and to conquer". All four are riding now, imo, but not yet at a full gallop.
Please consider the essay below. It is happening.
https://open.substack.com/pub/twowingsrev12/p/charge-of-the-horsemen?r=ufiq4&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Having been down a particular rabbit hole I'm curious how effective direct challenge experiments even are? I'm under the impression that the history of actual transmission in experimentation is tenuous where most of the time instead of any sort of natural route of infection the methodology has to fall back on directly injecting a mixed solution into subjects. One example was in trying to reliably reproduce polio transmission in monkeys they ended up removing their tonsils and exposing them that way...or something along those lines back in the day. that in the spanish flu they couldn't get subjects sick even with direct exposure. That the reason scientists scoff at mothers superstitions of catching a cold from being cold is because in experimentation transmission could not reliably be produced despite reproducing being cold. That even as recently as with covid mouse studies, the infection part of the experiment wasn't left to normal routes of transmission but a solution was injected directly into the mice. I wouldn't mind reading more about this particular challenge in the science of reproducing transmission at all.
An article worthy of full publication in every outlet in the nation. I'll share it in and outside our visible globe, an Aplus writing tht needs to be told.. Thank you for writing it.
After WW II, it’s been my wondering why only the Nuremberg “CODES” were established instead of worldwide, enforceable “ L A W S “ for accountability-with-consequences. Considering the absolutely evil intentions for war and human, medical destructions, I’m fairly certain this was an INTENTION to enable an ‘emotional loophole’ beyond ‘victors’ and ‘losers’ to both appease yet enable the CONtinuation of medical atrocities WITHOUT direct, enforced LAWS. So, the mindsets CONtinued as disingenuous “re$earch” until the COVID-19 fear campaigns were injected across the Created FLAT EARTH realm without accountability for lies supporting the CRIMES still being executed. This is CONtinuing as the UN’s W.H.O. pushes for absolute Power, Profit and CONtrol through their deceptive, “Pandemic ‘Treaty’“ cloaking Worldwide Health Tyranny after May 2024 … unless STOPPED now.
Seems COVID-1984 was more a “practice run” to condition or WAKE UP humans to either remain or prevent ‘lab rats’ from locking or destroying the cages of fear and greed of War$ FOR Big HARM-US-see$.
wow, it boggles my mind that more people aren't freaking out on this particular 'study' method. do they really think that young people are not going to transmit whatever disease unintentionally?? more proof that the vast majority of professional 'ethicists' (when a human trait becomes a profession is weird to start with) are obviously bought and paid for, with nary a question raised.
it sounds like they are normalizing this concept (infected intentionally) so that later on, when more and more people are deliberately impoverished, it will be considered normal and moral to sell your body this way. its very different than homeless addicts selling their blood, as I'm sure the proponents will try to play it this way. you watch, they will sell it like its some generous and moral opportunity.
You might enjoy this, quite prophetic short story; these days, it does not sound much like fiction: https://rwasamizdat.substack.com/p/the-small-life-of-stuart-calvin-zabuzhko
"This is not an April Fool's Joke"
thanks for the disclaimer, our World has gone so mad, it's hard to tell sometimes!
This practice seems to be based on the germ theory and the profit desires of pharmacological manufacturers. People willing to sell their lives for minimum wage are a tragic comment on civilization. As is the willingness of Pharma to profit from it. This is massively immoral.
My comment on germ theory is based on the undisputed belief in a drug to cure a disease. These “researchers” are not trying to understand the nature of disease: its requirements for an unbalanced host and ways in which to rebalance the host thereby reinstating health.
No, this practice consumes volunteers. It is monstrous.
Listen up !
All too many writers and speakers are giving wiggle room for criminality to be excused with phrases like “… APPEAR to have all but been FORGOTTEN … “
My recommendation for this slip-sliding-hiding away language is to read and marinade their brain with Margaret Anna Alice’s crisp writing of “Mistakes Were NOT Made ; An Anthem for Justice” Found at :
https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/mistakes-were-not-made-an-anthem
So many concerns with any institution with "Doherty" in it's name.
With the Moderna mRNA Platform manufacturing plant in their back yard the DCT unit is an obvious likely testing ground for new "codes".
Looks like the Long COVID shroud is being removed:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.03.24.24304286v1
Let's keep an eye out for this mRNA spike production/transfection story to evolve.
Funding Statement -
This study did not receive any funding
But of course! Let us wait and see what happens to the pre-print.
I hope Doherty volunteers himself, to be fair. Well, we know where disease X may hail from now. Seriously, how can this be legal? Why now?
This Human Challenge project has been brewing in the background for years thanks to the usual players.
The Doherty Clinical Trial fact sheet refrences WHO 2016 working group report (which dates back to 2014), a 2018 Lancet paper and good old Wellcome Trust 2022 meeting. The latter meeting had representation from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Bill and Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute in USA (I wasn't aware of that one!)). They all were discussing the Human Challenge Trials.
------2014 During the "Decade of Vaccines"
"The proposal to prepare WHO guidance on human challenge trials was developed during a WHO Consultation on clinical evaluation of vaccines held in Geneva, Switzerland, 17–18 July 2014", backed by the global regulators.
https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/human-challenge-trials-for-vaccine-a10-trs-no-1004
---------------
Thanks James, I've added Doherty Clinical Trials to the pandemic timeline which ref links.
https://totalityofevidence.com/timeline/doherty-clinical-trials-is-launched-to-infect-human-test-subjects-first-of-its-kind/
Take a look at what was happening leading up to 2014
https://totalityofevidence.com/pandemic-timeline/pre-pandemic-2000-2015/
You make many excellent points, articulately and dispassionately expressed. Who could argue? Thank you, Dr. Jack.
Know this: there are no "cure trials." Cured is not medically defined for most diseases, including COVID - and as a result "cured" cannot be tested and proven. Nobody cares about cures. Cures are simply not profitable. A cure can only be sold to someone who has the disease and if it works, it can only be sold once. "Preventatives are more profitable than cures." - because they don't require the disease. There's lots of money in preparation.