No, I do not believe that I have that right. I believe that an individual should have as much freedom as possible, so long as that freedom doesn't interfere with the equal rights of other individuals to do the same. There will necessarily be a few exceptions for the good of all, but the problem here is that the federal government is claiming too much coercive power. Perhaps we should give the Articles of Confederation a second chance.
“The good of all” or the “greater good” is a trap. The public good must never trump individual rights. If you look after individual rights, the “greater good” will inevitably be served or will look after itself.
Agreed. "The common good" - everyone driving on the right side of the road, my right to voice an opinion doesn't infringe on anyone else's right to voice an alternate view - is what I'm seeking to maximize. The "greater good" is a trap, because it's offered in the opinion of the beholder. If the beholder holds political office, you can bet that shenanigans are afoot.
That said, we do need some common sense regulation of a a few grey areas, but good luck locating common sense on Capitol Hill.
For many of us this social contract was irreparably broken when FDA began rubber stamping biotech creations in the food supply with nothing more than Monsanto believes & legal loopholes to create a category of "substantial equivalent" that substitutes traditional elements for novel products as if Nature follows their sleight of hand definitions.
Biotechnology Consultation Memorandum of Conference BNF No. 000001
September 19, 1994
Wholesomeness Studies
Monsanto described the results of wholesomeness studies they carried out in rats, chickens, catfish, dairy cattle, and bobwhite quail. On the basis of their consideration of the totality of these studies, Monsanto has concluded that there is no significant difference in the wholesomeness of glyphosate-tolerant and traditional soybean varieties, as expected from their compositional analysis. These data are summarized on page 49 of Monsanto's September 2 submission.
Conclusions
Monsanto has concluded, in essence, that the glyphosate-tolerant soybean variety they have developed is not significantly altered within the meaning of 21 CFR 170.30(f)(2) when compared to soybean varieties with a history of safe use. At this time, based on Monsanto's description of its data and analysis, the agency considers Monsanto's consultation on this product to be complete.
We do understand where this demonic death spiral for our littles was spawned ...in hell, not heaven. The once great fda has fallen along with the cdc. “For the love of money is the root of all evil” is as true today as it was when it was written in Holy Scripture.
they are probably just trying their best ... as one panel member said, there is no way you know if those vaxx work on kids unless you try them ... given that is an pandemic, cant take the chance of waiting for clinical trials, one got to try it himself ... fingers crossed!!
What you're describing is a prospective non-randomized clinical trial without informed consent. That is illegal under the US code of federal regulations..
Not any longer. Buried within the abomination that is Obama care is a stipulation that the public is not entitled to informed consent if the government determines it is in the public interest to withhold informed consent. No doubt this is unconstitutional, but someone would have to challenge, and we all know how compromised our court system has become. Add it to the list of stuff that has to be fixed, along with reinstating the Smith-Mundt act, and making pharmaceutical ads illegal again.
Sorry I don’t. I can’t even remember where I read it, but I was so incensed, it stuck with me. Obama snuck through a lot of crap, like ending Smith-Mundt, so that the government can legally lie to / propagandize its citizens. As for Obamacare, it’s what you get with these bills that are thousands of pages long that no one ever reads. Either things change or we are doomed.
Yeah... Few people realize that Barry is a Cousin of Dick Cheney's, from a CIA Family...and that he worked as an "intern", at a CIA-Front Company, in Afghanistan, during Operation CYCLONE, under GHWBUSH41.
That Legislation may temporarily be considered "legal" - but it would always have been UnLawful.
No! They AREN'T trying their best. There isn't even a "Pandemic" by any reasonable estimation. There's a BioWeaponized Virus going around - and the current variants are notably benign. Those variants are actually doing a better job, of providing a durable, long-lasting, broad spectrum immunity, for the communities affected, than the dangerous, ineffective and insufficiently tested, forced/coerced Human Medical Experimentation mRNA Gene Therapy injections program has. Even Bill Gates admits this.
The quote that you're referencing actually is proof that they're willing to risk children's lives and health, to experiment upon them, with biological products which have been clearly demonstrated to offer no lasting protection, and harm far more than they help - both at a societal level, and at the level of individual patients. At best that quote is an act in the furtherance of a criminal conspiracy, and an admission that safety and effectiveness aren't the primary drivers behind what's occuring.
I understand Max Verstappen's turbosupercharger picked up several thousand revolutions per minute from the "incidental energy"of the FDA-Big Pharma revolving door.
It is not hard to believe, but the first Formula One team to court a "Big Pharma" sponsorship would have a massive advantage. Lewis Hamilton and Mercedes has "Crowdstrike" sponsorship, but I think the disinformation is slowing them down.
Criminal FDA Hides Records From Moderna “Vaccine” Approval and Fabricates Data To Justify Approval For Injecting Babies With mRNA Bioweapon
FDA Sued Over Hiding Records From Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine Approval. FDA's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee report June 14-15 "raises serious questions of malfeasance"
Even the language is Orwellian. "Do the benefits exceed the risks?" So, if 49% of the children die from the vaccine, but 51% of them experience no covid symptoms whatsoever (from a disease from which they were never at risk in the first place) does that indicate that a panelist should vote to affirm the vaccine?
"The details of the manipulations are being reported and noted by Dr. Meryl Nass, James Roguski, Toby Rogers, and others. Many of us literally cannot tolerate listening to the lies and manipulations. We are grateful for your ability to stay calm enough to not throw your laptops across the room in disgust."
Amen to that.. my own reaction was more on the order of wishing to have a Tyler Perry's Medea style persuasive conversation with VRBPAC members maybe a steel toed work-boot for emphasis!
vote the bums out!!
maga!!
:-)
still say maga !! ivanka is a davos young leaders member ... so i am sure she has our best interests at heart ....
you might enjoy this trip back in time ... same things all the time ...
https://samim.io/p/2021-12-23-this-week-we-time-travel-to-1530-and-geneva/
No, I do not believe that I have that right. I believe that an individual should have as much freedom as possible, so long as that freedom doesn't interfere with the equal rights of other individuals to do the same. There will necessarily be a few exceptions for the good of all, but the problem here is that the federal government is claiming too much coercive power. Perhaps we should give the Articles of Confederation a second chance.
“The good of all” or the “greater good” is a trap. The public good must never trump individual rights. If you look after individual rights, the “greater good” will inevitably be served or will look after itself.
Agreed. "The common good" - everyone driving on the right side of the road, my right to voice an opinion doesn't infringe on anyone else's right to voice an alternate view - is what I'm seeking to maximize. The "greater good" is a trap, because it's offered in the opinion of the beholder. If the beholder holds political office, you can bet that shenanigans are afoot.
That said, we do need some common sense regulation of a a few grey areas, but good luck locating common sense on Capitol Hill.
Yes, it's a sacred social contract, and they have broken it.
For many of us this social contract was irreparably broken when FDA began rubber stamping biotech creations in the food supply with nothing more than Monsanto believes & legal loopholes to create a category of "substantial equivalent" that substitutes traditional elements for novel products as if Nature follows their sleight of hand definitions.
Biotechnology Consultation Memorandum of Conference BNF No. 000001
September 19, 1994
Wholesomeness Studies
Monsanto described the results of wholesomeness studies they carried out in rats, chickens, catfish, dairy cattle, and bobwhite quail. On the basis of their consideration of the totality of these studies, Monsanto has concluded that there is no significant difference in the wholesomeness of glyphosate-tolerant and traditional soybean varieties, as expected from their compositional analysis. These data are summarized on page 49 of Monsanto's September 2 submission.
Conclusions
Monsanto has concluded, in essence, that the glyphosate-tolerant soybean variety they have developed is not significantly altered within the meaning of 21 CFR 170.30(f)(2) when compared to soybean varieties with a history of safe use. At this time, based on Monsanto's description of its data and analysis, the agency considers Monsanto's consultation on this product to be complete.
F. Owen Fields, Ph.D.
http://web.archive.org/web/20101122021318/www.fda.gov/Food/Biotechnology/Submissions/ucm161130.htm
Agreed.
Rogers. Dr. Toby Rogers :)
Thank you. Dang, I knew a Toby MacDonald once and can't get that outta my head. Sorry, Toby!!!
We do understand where this demonic death spiral for our littles was spawned ...in hell, not heaven. The once great fda has fallen along with the cdc. “For the love of money is the root of all evil” is as true today as it was when it was written in Holy Scripture.
they are probably just trying their best ... as one panel member said, there is no way you know if those vaxx work on kids unless you try them ... given that is an pandemic, cant take the chance of waiting for clinical trials, one got to try it himself ... fingers crossed!!
What you're describing is a prospective non-randomized clinical trial without informed consent. That is illegal under the US code of federal regulations..
not sure what illegal means anymore, but here it is in his own words the FDA voting member during a panel discussion on mRNA trump vaxx for kids:
https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1453095851824459776
Not any longer. Buried within the abomination that is Obama care is a stipulation that the public is not entitled to informed consent if the government determines it is in the public interest to withhold informed consent. No doubt this is unconstitutional, but someone would have to challenge, and we all know how compromised our court system has become. Add it to the list of stuff that has to be fixed, along with reinstating the Smith-Mundt act, and making pharmaceutical ads illegal again.
You have any idea where that provision of the ACA can be found?
Sorry I don’t. I can’t even remember where I read it, but I was so incensed, it stuck with me. Obama snuck through a lot of crap, like ending Smith-Mundt, so that the government can legally lie to / propagandize its citizens. As for Obamacare, it’s what you get with these bills that are thousands of pages long that no one ever reads. Either things change or we are doomed.
Yeah... Few people realize that Barry is a Cousin of Dick Cheney's, from a CIA Family...and that he worked as an "intern", at a CIA-Front Company, in Afghanistan, during Operation CYCLONE, under GHWBUSH41.
That Legislation may temporarily be considered "legal" - but it would always have been UnLawful.
Trying their best to what?
No! They AREN'T trying their best. There isn't even a "Pandemic" by any reasonable estimation. There's a BioWeaponized Virus going around - and the current variants are notably benign. Those variants are actually doing a better job, of providing a durable, long-lasting, broad spectrum immunity, for the communities affected, than the dangerous, ineffective and insufficiently tested, forced/coerced Human Medical Experimentation mRNA Gene Therapy injections program has. Even Bill Gates admits this.
The quote that you're referencing actually is proof that they're willing to risk children's lives and health, to experiment upon them, with biological products which have been clearly demonstrated to offer no lasting protection, and harm far more than they help - both at a societal level, and at the level of individual patients. At best that quote is an act in the furtherance of a criminal conspiracy, and an admission that safety and effectiveness aren't the primary drivers behind what's occuring.
Wow, 100% "solidarity."
I understand Max Verstappen's turbosupercharger picked up several thousand revolutions per minute from the "incidental energy"of the FDA-Big Pharma revolving door.
It is not hard to believe, but the first Formula One team to court a "Big Pharma" sponsorship would have a massive advantage. Lewis Hamilton and Mercedes has "Crowdstrike" sponsorship, but I think the disinformation is slowing them down.
If Max involves himself with Big Pharma he'll likely experience severe mechanical side effects.
I think he is way smarter than that obviously immoral association.
His daddy, Josh, who I watched race decades ago, has good instincts.
Go Lando, & Daniel. McLaren ROCKS!
Criminal FDA Hides Records From Moderna “Vaccine” Approval and Fabricates Data To Justify Approval For Injecting Babies With mRNA Bioweapon
FDA Sued Over Hiding Records From Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine Approval. FDA's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee report June 14-15 "raises serious questions of malfeasance"
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/criminal-fda-hides-records-from-moderna?s=w
Sacrificing Children to Moloch: NHS Added mRNA Jabs to the List of Scheduled Vaccines for Children. Shots for Kids Under 5 Could Begin on June 21
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/sacrificing-children-to-moloch-nhs?s=w
Thank you to all of you for everything you're doing. Heroes, all.
Even the language is Orwellian. "Do the benefits exceed the risks?" So, if 49% of the children die from the vaccine, but 51% of them experience no covid symptoms whatsoever (from a disease from which they were never at risk in the first place) does that indicate that a panelist should vote to affirm the vaccine?
Worth noting Moderna and FDA agreed post Omicron over 77% of kids have natural immunity.
Yikes. The cognitive dissonance on the alleged "efficacy" of the "vaccines" is truly staggering.
"The details of the manipulations are being reported and noted by Dr. Meryl Nass, James Roguski, Toby Rogers, and others. Many of us literally cannot tolerate listening to the lies and manipulations. We are grateful for your ability to stay calm enough to not throw your laptops across the room in disgust."
Amen to that.. my own reaction was more on the order of wishing to have a Tyler Perry's Medea style persuasive conversation with VRBPAC members maybe a steel toed work-boot for emphasis!
Some people think this corruption is new for the FDA/CDC , in reality they have been knowingly approving poison for use in people for decades