18 Comments

Free choice ? Remarkable.

Expand full comment

Follow the $cience

Expand full comment

I fear the only hope to stop this madness are the class action lawyers. But only after untold injuries and deaths. Will our institutions ever be trusted again by those who have (misplaced) faith in such places?

Expand full comment

Thanks for that. Quite shocking. It should forbidden for pregnancy. Thanks for mentioning informed consent - here is an article and a "Truly Informed Consent Checklist" that can be printed and given to parents before jabbing their kids. Fully Informed Consent on Behalf of Children

A Checklist for Pfizer BioNTech Injections for Ages 5 - 11

https://coronawise.substack.com/p/informed-consent-on-behalf-of-children

Expand full comment

“I don’t think you can ethically tell a woman with COVID-19 that she can’t have the drug if she’s decided that’s what she needs,” said Cragan, a panel member and staffer with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “I think the final decision has to come down to the individual woman and her provider.” "As long as the drug is not generic he added"

Expand full comment

Even more interesting, there "post-interim" efficacy was negative. It is reported in https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/95944 "when examining only the data from the post-interim analysis enrollment, there were fewer placebo patients who were hospitalized or died by day 29 versus patients receiving the intervention (4.7% vs 6.2%, respectively)."

These values seemingly have to be reverse calculated from the interim and final figures posted by the FDA. (final-interim hospitalizations of deaths) / (final-interim total participants)

M: (48-28)/(709-385) = (20/324) = 6.17%

P: (68-53)/(699-377) = (15/322) = 4.66%

Placebo outcomes skewed negative in the first part of the trial for whatever reason (such as if the latter portion of the trial included fewer potentially severe cases because the summer surge increased testing of mild symptoms).

Once that skew was taken away, a better picture at how the drug impacts the course of the disease appeared; or, a bitter view of direct harms from the drug. Hard to pick the more likely explanation since the 29 day follow-up metric of "hospitalized over 24 hours" is too short to capture the full scope of toxicity from the drug (https://unglossed.substack.com/p/doppelganger)

Expand full comment

The Chinese doctors emptied the Wuhan ICU beds and opened up the country with Chinese herbal medicine! Then they approved am existing Over The Counter medication called Lianhua Qingwen Jiaonong for use against first and second stage covid! No Vaccine! No deaths from “side effects”, no “acceptable death levels from the cure.

Expand full comment

Pregnant woman and her provider’s choice? Oh the hypocrisy of these clinically insane people 🤦🏻‍♀️ Never again will I trust America’s medical institution, much less Big Pharma.

Expand full comment

Participants in the clinical trials were required to use robust birth control, both males and females. What's that telling you? And it's not just mutations of human DNA we need to worry about; the drug creates viral mutants as well. That's actually its mode of action. The viral mutations are intended to knock out the virus, but conceivably they could here and there produce a more dangerous strain. Additionally, all trial participants (I use "all" loosely because the trials were very small) were unvaccinated, so the drug hasn't been tested in vaccinated people. I watched the advisory committee hearing and was glad to see many of the participants bringing concerns like these forward.

Expand full comment