Fact checking is the most fake news of all. Fact checkers are frauds; they aren't "independent" and they don't "check facts."
They’re paid tens of millions of dollars each year by Pharma, Rockefeller Foundation, Gates, Soros, governments - paid to publish lies, gaslighting propaganda and marketing material for their paymasters - and to falsely discredit any truth and dissenting voices who oppose the corruption and agendas of these special interests. 
Fact checkers, owned by pharma, checking on research, also owned by pharma. Anyone relying on this state of affairs as a source of information is delusional. Fact!
Oh they do check facts. And then look for ways to make them shine in the light their boss wants them to be seen in, so that when someone of the target audience, rarely enough, actually tries to superficially glance at things, it seems to check out, and "it's settled".
and let us not forget each ‘fact check’ organization has its own group of funders, backing it, even continually finding it, typically owned and operated with big Pharma interests
Anyone who still relies on factcheck.org for truth is someone who exists beyond the concepts of logic and reason and should not be debated with unless publicly in a debate that might influence propels who actually use their brains.
sadly, my bff (of over 45 yrs) thinks Politifact and Yahoo headlines are 'facts' and 'news'. ugh. she will either ignore or shout me down, if I try to steer her to ANY other information sources.
Thank you so much for writing this. And incase the 2000 Verstraeten DeStefano VSD study and Simpsonwood transcripts aren’t enough for the “fact checkers” there are also all the FOIAed internal CDC emails where they plot the cover up, which anyone can read here:
That link leaves off at the point where the CDC finds the soon to be felon fugitive Poul Thorson of the Staten Serums Institute to author a bunch of fraudulent studies to cover their butt. Oh look. He’s still on the top ten OIG most wanted fugitive felons list:
You just have to meet a minimum of 3 to 5 people who have kids with autism. Then you listen carefully to their stories. If you use your intuition and ability to discern the facts presented, you then know the truth. That means anyone who tells you vaccines don't cause autism is lying because, one, they have a personally vested interest in vaccines and the pharmaceutical industry; two, they don't take any personal-moral responsibility for what they market and couldn't care less about their customers; three, they are completely brainwashed by their employers, mentors and/or funders and regardless of what they themselves think, disregard their own conscience; and, four, they have a limited education about the physiology and health of the child and are not only ignorant, very blind and naive.
And let us not forget that up to 85 per cent of medical academia assertions and findings, published though they are, cannot be repeated in the lab. Falsehood begets falsehood. The funding of the research in the field skews findings in a grotesque, anti-science manner.
This might seem too large a figure to be true, but it is much easier to imagine when you consider that around 50% of medical trials are not published at all.”
D'ya mean that those idiot fake fact checkers, with their degree from Pisgy State Univ. if 18th C. Belgian Lesbian Musicology that took seven years to complete are idiots?
Fact checking is the most fake news of all. Fact checkers are frauds; they aren't "independent" and they don't "check facts."
They’re paid tens of millions of dollars each year by Pharma, Rockefeller Foundation, Gates, Soros, governments - paid to publish lies, gaslighting propaganda and marketing material for their paymasters - and to falsely discredit any truth and dissenting voices who oppose the corruption and agendas of these special interests. 
Fact checkers, owned by pharma, checking on research, also owned by pharma. Anyone relying on this state of affairs as a source of information is delusional. Fact!
Oh they do check facts. And then look for ways to make them shine in the light their boss wants them to be seen in, so that when someone of the target audience, rarely enough, actually tries to superficially glance at things, it seems to check out, and "it's settled".
I recommend JL-W's course.
Who? Link please!
and let us not forget each ‘fact check’ organization has its own group of funders, backing it, even continually finding it, typically owned and operated with big Pharma interests
Anyone who still relies on factcheck.org for truth is someone who exists beyond the concepts of logic and reason and should not be debated with unless publicly in a debate that might influence propels who actually use their brains.
sadly, my bff (of over 45 yrs) thinks Politifact and Yahoo headlines are 'facts' and 'news'. ugh. she will either ignore or shout me down, if I try to steer her to ANY other information sources.
Thank you so much for writing this. And incase the 2000 Verstraeten DeStefano VSD study and Simpsonwood transcripts aren’t enough for the “fact checkers” there are also all the FOIAed internal CDC emails where they plot the cover up, which anyone can read here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20170119071832/http://putchildrenfirst.org/chapter1.html
That link leaves off at the point where the CDC finds the soon to be felon fugitive Poul Thorson of the Staten Serums Institute to author a bunch of fraudulent studies to cover their butt. Oh look. He’s still on the top ten OIG most wanted fugitive felons list:
https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/fugitives/
When pray God will the truth be known??? Praise be to the truth tellers!
when will the truth be known? when the power players run out of money, I suppose.
You just have to meet a minimum of 3 to 5 people who have kids with autism. Then you listen carefully to their stories. If you use your intuition and ability to discern the facts presented, you then know the truth. That means anyone who tells you vaccines don't cause autism is lying because, one, they have a personally vested interest in vaccines and the pharmaceutical industry; two, they don't take any personal-moral responsibility for what they market and couldn't care less about their customers; three, they are completely brainwashed by their employers, mentors and/or funders and regardless of what they themselves think, disregard their own conscience; and, four, they have a limited education about the physiology and health of the child and are not only ignorant, very blind and naive.
And let us not forget that up to 85 per cent of medical academia assertions and findings, published though they are, cannot be repeated in the lab. Falsehood begets falsehood. The funding of the research in the field skews findings in a grotesque, anti-science manner.
“…about 85% of all research is simply wasted.
This might seem too large a figure to be true, but it is much easier to imagine when you consider that around 50% of medical trials are not published at all.”
https://theconversation.com/medical-research-is-broken-heres-how-we-can-fix-it-145281
You rock, James!
D'ya mean that those idiot fake fact checkers, with their degree from Pisgy State Univ. if 18th C. Belgian Lesbian Musicology that took seven years to complete are idiots?
Quod erat demonstrandum.