Outsmarting and outclassing Gorski have never been difficult. But Dr. Bridle has done both, very well, much to Gorski's embarrassment. Facts are facts.
“People had been scammed by their own politicians, mainstream media, and Big Pharma. Not for money this time, but for their health, and perhaps their souls.”
Excellent. Thank you Byram. We’re with you. Sometimes I’m proud of my Alma Mater. The research on this has been so important. I’m hoping that it will be the key to unlocking the chains protecting these crooks from liability.
Bridle has been correct from the beginning! I am so grateful for his brilliant analysis of these transfections, and boldness to stand up against the false claims. He is an anchor in what is still a dark and stormy battle.
I can't believe he said SV40 virus is oncogenic, but it was not responsible for causing cancer in those injected with it in the polio shot. Are there unbiased studies to prove this? Also, he called Dr. Peter McCullough one of the most reputable cardiologists in the world a quack, wow! He also used the pejorative label for scientists and doctors concerned with the safety of vaccines, anti-vaxxers. I guess he is entitled to his opinion, although it is wrong. As James Lyons-Weiler explained, the lipid nanoparticle allows the DNA fragments to be taken up by any cell. Also, Gorski didn't mention that some plasmids do enter the nucleus. How can he be certain this phenomenon poses no threat by turning on cancer genes? His slanderous labels and insults detract from his professional credibility, along with his errors in science. I put it down to egotism myself. It is very blinding.
I just labeled the man, very difficult to 'rise above' in the face of monstrous opinions that will influence people to the point of taking them to the brink of death.
I wish him no harm, but Gorski has worked very hard to harm others. He's an adult man who should be held accountable for the harm he's done. Part of that means we should all lower our expectations of rationality and logic from him. That's not the same as calling him an idiot. He deserves to be mostly ignored.
I happened upon the unkind, shallow and diversionary remarks of Dr Gorski and was shocked to learn that they belonged to a medical man.
Nevertheless, I feel obliged to limit my criticism of him. In the UK some decades ago, a similarly eminent and emotionally fragile cancer specialist delighted in learning that those who chose gentler forms of cancer treatment died before those receiving what is known as conventional care. It was then discovered that there had been an inadvertent mistake with the calculations and the results were reversed. The doctor committed suicide.
What a sad world we live in – with the most broken unable to realise that they could aspire to be a more humane version of themselves.
Yes, the wisest course, just ignore, but unfortunately, he has the lingo to bamboozle the average person into thinking that all the SV40 plasmids are innocuous. Every person who has taken the shot is entitled to know what has been injected. To prevent hysteria maybe taking the ostrich approach will work for a while. But that will cause more harm long term. The energy of my concern is primarily for children. Adults have the choice to exercise healthy skepticism and the choice to say no. Kids do not.
In your example 1, Dr Gorski will most likely rely on the debunking of Carbone & his work. As to anything controversial there are 2 sides to it, the system will produce “science” (epidemiological usually) that defends the narrative & assays public fears or genuine scientific concerns by ethical researchers.
In relation to the Health Canada claim, I would be very careful about this. In my experience, regulators always cover themselves, using very carefully worded statements. I haven’t delved into this particular instance, but I wouldn’t be surprised if their statement has been misrepresented.
Thank you for at least offering to have a discussion with him. Hopefully, more people will be able to see through that what Dr Gorski & the skeptic network he is a part of, have been doing for at least the last 2 decades.
“People had been scammed by their own politicians, mainstream media, and Big Pharma. Not for money this time, but for their health, and perhaps their souls.”
I love this "We will NOT comply with tyranny!" T.
This one: t.co/bYpaPIOLHM
Excellent. Thank you Byram. We’re with you. Sometimes I’m proud of my Alma Mater. The research on this has been so important. I’m hoping that it will be the key to unlocking the chains protecting these crooks from liability.
Bridle has been correct from the beginning! I am so grateful for his brilliant analysis of these transfections, and boldness to stand up against the false claims. He is an anchor in what is still a dark and stormy battle.
I can't believe he said SV40 virus is oncogenic, but it was not responsible for causing cancer in those injected with it in the polio shot. Are there unbiased studies to prove this? Also, he called Dr. Peter McCullough one of the most reputable cardiologists in the world a quack, wow! He also used the pejorative label for scientists and doctors concerned with the safety of vaccines, anti-vaxxers. I guess he is entitled to his opinion, although it is wrong. As James Lyons-Weiler explained, the lipid nanoparticle allows the DNA fragments to be taken up by any cell. Also, Gorski didn't mention that some plasmids do enter the nucleus. How can he be certain this phenomenon poses no threat by turning on cancer genes? His slanderous labels and insults detract from his professional credibility, along with his errors in science. I put it down to egotism myself. It is very blinding.
See what I mean? The power of acumen is low in this one.
That is a nice way to say an obvious idiot.
I just labeled the man, very difficult to 'rise above' in the face of monstrous opinions that will influence people to the point of taking them to the brink of death.
I wish him no harm, but Gorski has worked very hard to harm others. He's an adult man who should be held accountable for the harm he's done. Part of that means we should all lower our expectations of rationality and logic from him. That's not the same as calling him an idiot. He deserves to be mostly ignored.
I wonder how many authentic sacred miracle elixir jabs old Gorski received? Did he receive the saline version? Would be interesting to know....
Does he keep up with all his boosters, flu included?
I happened upon the unkind, shallow and diversionary remarks of Dr Gorski and was shocked to learn that they belonged to a medical man.
Nevertheless, I feel obliged to limit my criticism of him. In the UK some decades ago, a similarly eminent and emotionally fragile cancer specialist delighted in learning that those who chose gentler forms of cancer treatment died before those receiving what is known as conventional care. It was then discovered that there had been an inadvertent mistake with the calculations and the results were reversed. The doctor committed suicide.
What a sad world we live in – with the most broken unable to realise that they could aspire to be a more humane version of themselves.
Anyway, thank you Dr Bridle and Dr Lyons-Weiler.
Yes, the wisest course, just ignore, but unfortunately, he has the lingo to bamboozle the average person into thinking that all the SV40 plasmids are innocuous. Every person who has taken the shot is entitled to know what has been injected. To prevent hysteria maybe taking the ostrich approach will work for a while. But that will cause more harm long term. The energy of my concern is primarily for children. Adults have the choice to exercise healthy skepticism and the choice to say no. Kids do not.
.
Dear Chronically Vaccinated,
Abandon All Hope.
Because It Has Abandoned You.
And I Might Add,
I Had Nothing To Do With It.
So Fuck Off.
You Are Dirtying My Environment.
.
In your example 1, Dr Gorski will most likely rely on the debunking of Carbone & his work. As to anything controversial there are 2 sides to it, the system will produce “science” (epidemiological usually) that defends the narrative & assays public fears or genuine scientific concerns by ethical researchers.
In relation to the Health Canada claim, I would be very careful about this. In my experience, regulators always cover themselves, using very carefully worded statements. I haven’t delved into this particular instance, but I wouldn’t be surprised if their statement has been misrepresented.
Thank you for at least offering to have a discussion with him. Hopefully, more people will be able to see through that what Dr Gorski & the skeptic network he is a part of, have been doing for at least the last 2 decades.