I watched a video with Dr Meryl Nass a few minutes ago on rumble about vaccine ingredients we don't know about.
Professor Sucharit Bhakdi was speaking about the possibility of prosecution in Germany that was somewhat encouraging.
Well worth watching. A short video but very informative, as usual,with these two and the other Doctors participating.
Dr Nass was presenting information on the ingredients and the secrecy surrounding them and Dr Bhakdi was giving information on the Bio-n-tech company and some legal issues upcoming.
There’s an elephant in the room that I’m more confused about John. Why were the adverse events with the placebo so high? What was the actual placebo? Was it just saline or were there heavy metals also commingled I don’t believe this data I’ll be blunt to have adverse events that high in the placebo group makes absolutely no sense.
They don't use just saline for "placebo". At best it's everything else except the specific antigen (or precursor such as mRNA, but you get the PEGylated carrier); adjuvants and all. They often use another "vaccine" chosen for high adverse effects.
In my understanding there were 22,000 people in the placebo group for the Pfizer trial. They label negative health events in the placebo group as adverse events, but don't attribute them to the shot. They use it as a baseline comparison to the drug group. If a certain number of health events are happening randomly, and the drug group has more negative health events then random, then we know the drug has adverse health effects.
The risk benefit is ratio is pretty easy to answer. Purportedly, 100 cases of COVID-19 of 10,000 jabbed would have been averted over 90 days or so from the Pfizer data. 1 in 800 suffer serious events, let’s assume average time of recovery is 900 days. Risk benefit is roughly 900:90, 10:1.
AESI include death, hospitalization...etc, from COVID or any cause. Pfizer included COVID in safety data, Moderna did not ( or the other way around) check the study
0.57% of Moderna victims experienced serious adverse events. Meaning that >99% had no serious adverse events. So the average person who was vaccinated, and their close friends, probably experienced no adverse events. Which helps explain why it's difficult to persuade some folks that there's a problem.
That is if you believe there was a Covid to begin with. I don’t think the 2020 data was anything more than just people getting seasonal flu since we know that the death rates on the “flu“ dropped dramatically as alleged Covid deaths rose. Furthermore, what is the basis for the diagnosis of Covid? You guessed it the PCR and we know how worthless that test is. This may be redundant, but we know first of all that Kary Mullis, who designed and created the PCR said it should never be used as a diagnostic test, and he won the Nobel prize for it. Furthermore, we know that the CDC was able to change the cycle threshold, ad libitum to literally create false positives. So what possible value was the PCR……… None.
I got choking bronchial spasms from the Wuhan strain, and never had a PCR (or any other; why should I pay for a serotest and get jabbed - Deu 14:1 - they generally didn't report the number of replication cycles on PCR , and afaIk know, never ran blanks) just to prove I had it?) test? Consider this a dislike Substack doesn't provide. (How does one insert emoticons?) The bases in lamestream medicine for diagnosis of covid are chest CT (for bronchial inflammation - no, I didn't get a CT) and genetic sequencing. Damned right, there was a covid! It could have killed me! (Peppermint oil relieved the spasms.) Are you making excuses for Ralph Baric, Anthony Fraudci, Bill Gates, etc.? While flu has given me pneumonia, flu and cold never gave me choking bronchial spasms. As you damned well ought to know, coronavirus is infectious bronchitis virus (IBV - formerly Infectious Bronchitis Disease IBD). Right; people got sick from generally-nonexistent in early 2020 5G!
And as you tacitly acknowledge, viruses crowd other viruses out. I think that be an interferon effect.
I don't believe the Pfizer and Moderna studies finding one serious adverse event for each 800 vaccinees. An UnderReporting Factor (URF) of 40-50, as Steve Kirsch (41) and Dr. Josh Guetzkow and Del Bigtree's attorney(50) find, seems much more plausible. I.e., 1 in 16-20. They use a URF of 1 when VAERS and these Pfarm companies' studies are shown to elide most serious adverse events? (Those before 2 weeks after the second jab, Maddie de Garay, etc.) Why does John Campbell accept this? Fear of upsetting the normies and the fact chucker-outers?
The adverse effects data for this analysis comes from the trial, not VAERS. As to the matter of under reporting, it's pretty clear that Pfizer/Moderna have large vested interests in "defining away" data that is unhelpful to their cause, or in fact just ignoring it altogether.
Examples of this are legion. In the Pfizer trial, someone with a lot of time on their hands cross-checked that published data to find that over 1600 people were abducted by aliens (disappeared from the data). An FDA audit of the trial observed that almost 500 people in the trial reported Covid-19 like symptoms but were NEVER tested for infection, which is almost 3 times the purported infection signal in the data - this basically would invalidate the efficacy signal.
We will agree to disagree. You may have been sick, but I doubt very seriously if anyone had gotten samples of mucus from your lungs and truly attempted to isolate it and follow Koch postulates, and/or discovered under electron microscopy, they would’ve found nothing. Just because you were sick, doesn’t mean that you were sick necessarily with a specific virus. As you well know there is a School of thought that viruses may not exist at all. There’s overwhelming evidence, that AIDS was caused by a behavior pattern or exposure to a toxic environment has in Africa and had no relationship whatsoever to a retrovirus that was labeled HIV Peter Duuesberg was a world, renowned biologist, and a leading if not the leading authority on retroviruses, and his opinion was there was no way that there was any link whatsoever between a retrovirus no matter what you called it and AIDS. And a lot of those individuals many of them gay ended up taking Tony Fauci‘s AZT, which is what actually killed them. That’s elaborated in RFJ Jr’s book but many others had observed it before RFK Jr wrote it in his book. Furthermore, we have to factor in the possible toxic affect of 5G. There are a lot of potential explanations for why people are getting sick and dying from multiple toxic exposures but I’m pretty convinced that there’s no virus which as causative.. COVID-19 caused a non-pandemic for the last two years. it was their pretext to get many individuals to get in line to take what was called a vaccine, but actually turned out to be a and exercise in a pharmacological program. Sorry you got sick and are so emotional but when the dust settles we’ll see who’s right about this .
And by the way, the CDC and most hospitals refused to publish the cycle rate it was being used for the PCR, which would’ve precisely predicted the likelihood of falls positivity the only public official that I know of that demanded that the cycle rate be reported what’s the governor of Florida.
At the end of the day, we have a great deal of chaos going on right now a great deal of confusion and a great deal of miss direction. Multiple opinions again emphasis on chaos. That usually means that Satan is at the root of it and I often refer to Ephesians chapter 6: Put on the whole armor of God that you might stand against the wiles of the devil, for we struggle, not with flesh and blood, but against powers and principalities against the rulers of the darkness of this world against spiritual wickedness in high places. The chaos is going to continue because Satan is alive and well, and is the prince of the earth and he has minions and he has disciples and Acolytes just like Christ, our Lord. I pray that the world will come to discern the difference. God bless you and I’m sorry for your suffering. We’re all struggling for the truth.
Now I want Dr Campbell to do a re-analysis on the efficacy data. I'm genuinely curious why he recommended a vaccine with an absolute efficacy of less than 1%, tested on a largely youngish healthy population. I began watching him because I disagreed with him, and wanted to get that perspective. The fact that he is recognizing side effects and malfeasance in different areas means he's an ethical and evidence-based medical practitioner. I would love to understand from his view why he recommended it in the first place. Was he being as evidence-based regarding initial efficacy as he is now?
MANY evil people responsible for the fake vaccines deserve LIFE IN PRISON or worse!
They are lying, hiding info from us, caused/causing untold MILLIONS of injuries & deaths, STILL pushing the deadly shots, unnecessary lockdowns, destroyed economy, loss of jobs & businesses, etc... we DEMAND accountability?!?
Oh so wish I knew this and my husband too so he would have not taken the shot and still been here. :(
I’m so sorry for your loss!
Yes, this is beyond a travesty - it IS criminal.
Sorry to hear about your husband. 🙏
What does this tell us about our governments ?? We don’t need more evidence . We now need judgement don’t we ?
The regimes own judgment, or at least claim to, and nearly everyone accepts that presumption.
Always at the end , it ends up in the streets
I watched a video with Dr Meryl Nass a few minutes ago on rumble about vaccine ingredients we don't know about.
Professor Sucharit Bhakdi was speaking about the possibility of prosecution in Germany that was somewhat encouraging.
Well worth watching. A short video but very informative, as usual,with these two and the other Doctors participating.
Dr Nass was presenting information on the ingredients and the secrecy surrounding them and Dr Bhakdi was giving information on the Bio-n-tech company and some legal issues upcoming.
There’s an elephant in the room that I’m more confused about John. Why were the adverse events with the placebo so high? What was the actual placebo? Was it just saline or were there heavy metals also commingled I don’t believe this data I’ll be blunt to have adverse events that high in the placebo group makes absolutely no sense.
People in both groups would be getting sick from covid. This was 2020.
They don't use just saline for "placebo". At best it's everything else except the specific antigen (or precursor such as mRNA, but you get the PEGylated carrier); adjuvants and all. They often use another "vaccine" chosen for high adverse effects.
My point exactly that is not a placebo. That is a misdirect that is a Canard. 
In my understanding there were 22,000 people in the placebo group for the Pfizer trial. They label negative health events in the placebo group as adverse events, but don't attribute them to the shot. They use it as a baseline comparison to the drug group. If a certain number of health events are happening randomly, and the drug group has more negative health events then random, then we know the drug has adverse health effects.
Precisely.
The risk benefit is ratio is pretty easy to answer. Purportedly, 100 cases of COVID-19 of 10,000 jabbed would have been averted over 90 days or so from the Pfizer data. 1 in 800 suffer serious events, let’s assume average time of recovery is 900 days. Risk benefit is roughly 900:90, 10:1.
Why would someone given a placebo here have any adverse side effect? Or it wasn't really a placebo?
From covid? This was 2020.
AESI include death, hospitalization...etc, from COVID or any cause. Pfizer included COVID in safety data, Moderna did not ( or the other way around) check the study
Several outcomes have CI that include the Null value
0.57% of Moderna victims experienced serious adverse events. Meaning that >99% had no serious adverse events. So the average person who was vaccinated, and their close friends, probably experienced no adverse events. Which helps explain why it's difficult to persuade some folks that there's a problem.
That is if you believe there was a Covid to begin with. I don’t think the 2020 data was anything more than just people getting seasonal flu since we know that the death rates on the “flu“ dropped dramatically as alleged Covid deaths rose. Furthermore, what is the basis for the diagnosis of Covid? You guessed it the PCR and we know how worthless that test is. This may be redundant, but we know first of all that Kary Mullis, who designed and created the PCR said it should never be used as a diagnostic test, and he won the Nobel prize for it. Furthermore, we know that the CDC was able to change the cycle threshold, ad libitum to literally create false positives. So what possible value was the PCR……… None.
I got choking bronchial spasms from the Wuhan strain, and never had a PCR (or any other; why should I pay for a serotest and get jabbed - Deu 14:1 - they generally didn't report the number of replication cycles on PCR , and afaIk know, never ran blanks) just to prove I had it?) test? Consider this a dislike Substack doesn't provide. (How does one insert emoticons?) The bases in lamestream medicine for diagnosis of covid are chest CT (for bronchial inflammation - no, I didn't get a CT) and genetic sequencing. Damned right, there was a covid! It could have killed me! (Peppermint oil relieved the spasms.) Are you making excuses for Ralph Baric, Anthony Fraudci, Bill Gates, etc.? While flu has given me pneumonia, flu and cold never gave me choking bronchial spasms. As you damned well ought to know, coronavirus is infectious bronchitis virus (IBV - formerly Infectious Bronchitis Disease IBD). Right; people got sick from generally-nonexistent in early 2020 5G!
And as you tacitly acknowledge, viruses crowd other viruses out. I think that be an interferon effect.
Why are people in the placebo group suffering adverse reactions? To what? A placebo?
I don’t believe the placebo is a saline solution, but some other “safe” vaccine.
I don't believe the Pfizer and Moderna studies finding one serious adverse event for each 800 vaccinees. An UnderReporting Factor (URF) of 40-50, as Steve Kirsch (41) and Dr. Josh Guetzkow and Del Bigtree's attorney(50) find, seems much more plausible. I.e., 1 in 16-20. They use a URF of 1 when VAERS and these Pfarm companies' studies are shown to elide most serious adverse events? (Those before 2 weeks after the second jab, Maddie de Garay, etc.) Why does John Campbell accept this? Fear of upsetting the normies and the fact chucker-outers?
The adverse effects data for this analysis comes from the trial, not VAERS. As to the matter of under reporting, it's pretty clear that Pfizer/Moderna have large vested interests in "defining away" data that is unhelpful to their cause, or in fact just ignoring it altogether.
Examples of this are legion. In the Pfizer trial, someone with a lot of time on their hands cross-checked that published data to find that over 1600 people were abducted by aliens (disappeared from the data). An FDA audit of the trial observed that almost 500 people in the trial reported Covid-19 like symptoms but were NEVER tested for infection, which is almost 3 times the purported infection signal in the data - this basically would invalidate the efficacy signal.
As a famous internet feline calls it, Pfraud
There's much more
We will agree to disagree. You may have been sick, but I doubt very seriously if anyone had gotten samples of mucus from your lungs and truly attempted to isolate it and follow Koch postulates, and/or discovered under electron microscopy, they would’ve found nothing. Just because you were sick, doesn’t mean that you were sick necessarily with a specific virus. As you well know there is a School of thought that viruses may not exist at all. There’s overwhelming evidence, that AIDS was caused by a behavior pattern or exposure to a toxic environment has in Africa and had no relationship whatsoever to a retrovirus that was labeled HIV Peter Duuesberg was a world, renowned biologist, and a leading if not the leading authority on retroviruses, and his opinion was there was no way that there was any link whatsoever between a retrovirus no matter what you called it and AIDS. And a lot of those individuals many of them gay ended up taking Tony Fauci‘s AZT, which is what actually killed them. That’s elaborated in RFJ Jr’s book but many others had observed it before RFK Jr wrote it in his book. Furthermore, we have to factor in the possible toxic affect of 5G. There are a lot of potential explanations for why people are getting sick and dying from multiple toxic exposures but I’m pretty convinced that there’s no virus which as causative.. COVID-19 caused a non-pandemic for the last two years. it was their pretext to get many individuals to get in line to take what was called a vaccine, but actually turned out to be a and exercise in a pharmacological program. Sorry you got sick and are so emotional but when the dust settles we’ll see who’s right about this .
And by the way, the CDC and most hospitals refused to publish the cycle rate it was being used for the PCR, which would’ve precisely predicted the likelihood of falls positivity the only public official that I know of that demanded that the cycle rate be reported what’s the governor of Florida.
At the end of the day, we have a great deal of chaos going on right now a great deal of confusion and a great deal of miss direction. Multiple opinions again emphasis on chaos. That usually means that Satan is at the root of it and I often refer to Ephesians chapter 6: Put on the whole armor of God that you might stand against the wiles of the devil, for we struggle, not with flesh and blood, but against powers and principalities against the rulers of the darkness of this world against spiritual wickedness in high places. The chaos is going to continue because Satan is alive and well, and is the prince of the earth and he has minions and he has disciples and Acolytes just like Christ, our Lord. I pray that the world will come to discern the difference. God bless you and I’m sorry for your suffering. We’re all struggling for the truth.
Where is WikiLeaks when we need it? Only the DOD knows what was in the placebo group. Oh wait, the DOD has Assange too
Now I want Dr Campbell to do a re-analysis on the efficacy data. I'm genuinely curious why he recommended a vaccine with an absolute efficacy of less than 1%, tested on a largely youngish healthy population. I began watching him because I disagreed with him, and wanted to get that perspective. The fact that he is recognizing side effects and malfeasance in different areas means he's an ethical and evidence-based medical practitioner. I would love to understand from his view why he recommended it in the first place. Was he being as evidence-based regarding initial efficacy as he is now?
MANY evil people responsible for the fake vaccines deserve LIFE IN PRISON or worse!
They are lying, hiding info from us, caused/causing untold MILLIONS of injuries & deaths, STILL pushing the deadly shots, unnecessary lockdowns, destroyed economy, loss of jobs & businesses, etc... we DEMAND accountability?!?
I am neither surprised nor confused. I would be surprised if the actual rate of damage is not much worse. Dr. Campbell will likely remain confused.
Excellent video