Don't Forget the "Proximal Origins" Fraud that Covered Up My January 2020 Laboratory Origin Assertion

Those would abuse science in the name of fraud are not scientists and are not conducting science. They are fraudsters. We are not done with this.

When I first proposed the lab origin of the SARS-Cov-2 virus in January of 2020, I did not expect those involved to double- and triple-down in their attempts to coverup the obvious.

Incredibly, by March 2020, scientist from Shanghai and Beijing had already published a rebuttal in the journal Emerging Microbes & Infections that

“Dr James Lyons-Weiler, the CEO of the ‘Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge,’ made an appalling online statement on 3 February 2020, which claimed the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) responsible for the ongoing COVID-19 epidemic was most likely constructed via laboratory recombination.”

Hao P, Zhong W, Song S, Fan S, Li X. Is SARS-CoV-2 originated from laboratory? A rebuttal to the claim of formation via laboratory recombination. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Mar 8;9(1):545-547. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1738279. PMID: 32148173; PMCID: PMC7144200. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7144200/

Following the publication of that rebuttal, the CCP put out the word to all Chinese nationals doing science to stop publishing rebuttals.

It’s been painful to watch the coverup that ensued. Kristian Andersen’s alleged complicity in rolling over on the evidence that the SAR-CoV-2 sequence for Fauci did not appear to be consistent with evolutionary origins in the wild strikes many people as inexplicable; my expectation is that, if true, they planned his report to Fauci because they felt they had to bring the tempest into the teapot.

Another person who has disappointed is the famed evolutionary virologist Andrew Rambaut. To (apparently) be involved in such as scheme as to publish a paper that derived its conclusion from its agenda - to inform that world that (contrary to all evidence) the SARS-CoV-2 virus could not have originated in the lab - is a stain on his career that won’t wash away anytime soon.

Which brings us to the article I want to share with you. It points to the Wellcome Trust as a key player in the alleged cover-up. The article is very, very long and detailed, but when I said that history will remember, this is precisely what I knew would occur.

The article was published a while back by Johnny Vedmore (see: The Wellcome Five – The Proximal Origin of Covid Control – johnnyvedmore.com)

I want to reproduce only part of the article, as, to me, I believe it is the most important - it shows how scientists might sell out to appeal to their funders, something I have never done and never will.

“Andrew Rambaut and Kristian G Andersen – Proximal Origin Clean-up Crew

I had originally started out by building a picture of who these people were by looking at their families, schooling, career history, affiliations, and associations, to try and see any potential pattern which could help build a basic profile of these top table appointees. It cannot be understated, the individuals explored thus far in this article took up key roles and their task was viewed as an incredibly sensitive one for those who have been driving the Covid agenda. If we are to unravel the larger control network, we must build a profile of the people involved as doing so is vital in aiding our recognition of other players. In this case, that necessary profile was very easy to form thanks to the publication of the Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2 paper.

There are some other interesting scientists who were involved in the creation of the SARS-CoV-2 origin paper, the first being a man that fits the profile for one of the special 35 graduates who receive almost all of their career-long funding from the Wellcome Trust initiative that has been managed by Holmes since 1994.

Andrew Rambaut is a British evolutionary biologist who, as of 2020, held the position of Professor of Molecular Evolution at the University of Edinburgh. If you were to look at the official Wikipedia entry for Mr. Rambaut, you’d notice that there is, as of writing this, no mention of his participation in the SARS-CoV-2 paper. However, if you were to search his Wiki page’s history, you’d discover that all mentions of his part in the origin paper have been removed, by a computer with the IP address 92.238.235.86, which is also coincidentally based in Edinburgh. The aforementioned IP addresses edits have also included changes on the SARS-Cov-2 wiki entry, suggesting that these actors are still successfully altering the public information. Andrew Rambaut is a relatively young man, he has his entire career ahead of him, so why he agreed to be involved in such a nefarious scheme which was bound to be uncovered in the end?

One obvious reason why Andrew Rambaut was chosen by Farrar is because it was very much in Professor Rambaut’s financial interest to do so. The reason why Jeremy Farrar and his Wellcome friends are so important to the Establishment cannot be understated, Farrar and the “philanthropic” Wellcome Trust funds a large amount of expensive research, including projects led by Andrew Rambaut. Only two years prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, in January 2018, Farrar’s Wellcome Trust had been funding Professor Andrew Rambaut’s research. In fact almost all of Andrew Rambaut’s research has funding links to the Wellcome Trust.

Since taking part in the fake Covid origins paper, Rambaut has taken centre stage at some Wellcome Trust events. Between 13 and 15 September 2021, Professor Andrew Rambaut was a guest speaker for the Wellcome Trust’s “Wellcome Connecting Science Conference on Virus Genomics and Evolution.” The Wellcome Trust’s Sanger Institute had also published a case study authored by Andrew Rambaut in 2017, as well as other past collaborations published while Farrar has been leading the Wellcome Trust.

Kristian G Andersen’s input into the origin paper organised by Farrar is bizarre. Even though Andersen put his name on the paper, he was noted in the Fauci emails as studying the virus and, with the help of a small team, coming to the conclusion that it was in fact man-made. In the Fauci emails, Andersen states clearly:

“after discussions earlier today, Eddie, Bob, Mike and myself all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory”.

So, what made Professor Kristian Andersen become involved in a scientific paper which was very soon after come to the opposite conclusions? By February 2021, Kristian Andersen found himself having to defend his actions publicly, something none of these “scientists” seem to have been expecting. Andersen claimed that the emails to Anthony Fauci showing that he had found the viral genome to be “inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory” was simply a “clear example of the scientific process”.

There was no way for Andersen to avoid confronting the Fauci emails once they were published, with Professor Roger Pielke of the University of Colorado Boulder asking Andersen on Twitter to explain what “all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory” actually means in layman’s terms. Andersen’s response was to double down on the original findings by stating: “it specifically means we thought – on preliminary look – that the virus could have been engineered and/or manipulated. Turns out the data suggest otherwise – which is the conclusion of our paper.” In a further tweet, Andersen stated:

“Conspiracies have created a narrative where we all ‘dismissed it [the lab leak hypothesis] out of hand’.”

stating that the very idea was:

“absurd and couldn’t be further from the truth. It’s just that the data don’t support the hypothesis.”

So, knowing now that the lab leak theory is being accepted as the probable source, we can only conclude that either Professor Kristian Andersen is really incompetent at his job, or he was complicit in the creation of fake science, conjured up in an attempt to hide the true origins of SARS-CoV-2.

Although at first glance it may appear that Andersen has no obvious link to the Wellcome Trust, his postdoctoral advisor at the Harvard-linked Broad Institute was Pardis Sabeti, who I will mention shortly. Andersen heads up the Scripps Research’s Andersen Lab, which also includes external research contributions from fellow Proximal Origin paper authors Andrew Rambaut and Bob Garry.”

You can read the rest of the full article yourself, but the key reminder here is that anyone conducting scientist fraud are not conducting science. Science lies outside of the realm of fraud and vice-versa, and for the sake of our collective well-being, I urge people to keep this distinction in mind.

Those who have given science a bad name owe the rest of the scientific community an apology for staining our reputation. I cannot blame the public for their mistrust of “science”, nor its mistrust of big-profit allopathic medicine. I join them in my utter disdain for captured agencies and their no-bar low-bar to get pharmaceuticals into our bodies.

But I urge all scientists to come out and support my next initiative, which will publish soon - a very specific call for a very specific worldwide ban that you will read in the next few weeks.

Dr. McCollough and Dr. Sin Hang Lee support the call for the ban. If you’re a physician or scientist and would like to preview the call for the worldwide ban, send email to info at ipak-edu.org