47 Comments

Just a nanotechnology toxicity poisoning

https://outraged.substack.com/p/what-did-rw-malone-do-for-nanotherapeutics

Expand full comment

Malone needs to come clean on "medical countermeasures"; they're military countermeasures. I've unsubscribed from that whining fraud's Substack.

Expand full comment

Come clean? He's behind this.

He is not alone

Expand full comment

And still whining about his pretended persecution.

Expand full comment

Also come clean with the love-hate the SM relationship you all have with him, it’s preposterous he the one and only serial killer with a million fold newborns, you are the real controlled opposition I would call it voyeurism.

Expand full comment

Voyeurism is not strong enough.....what about fetishism?

Expand full comment

The subject or the smear? He says himself I come from the belly of the beast, so what is he hiding?

Expand full comment

This is all based on evidence, not on slandering anyone.

The cause of the unusual "Covid" deaths and injuries and the adverse effects of these injections is nanotechnology (quantum dots, carbon nanotubes and so on). https://outraged.substack.com/p/evidence-of-crimes-against-humanity

But even with all this evidence, some people can't fathom, some push it.

Expand full comment

Exposure the first step, but there has to be accountability to avoid repeats. I highly recommend the sub stack Radically Genuine with Dr. Roger Mcfillin, PsyD, he is speaking up on the dangers of psychotropic drugs. The medical system began to corrode due to the influence of the Rockefellers, and that in turn led to domination by pharma and its corrupting influence on science. It all has to be reversed. Hospitals are needed for emergencies and surgeries, but for recovery we need a very different type of facility, that becomes part of mainstream treatment. There is enough info from FOIA documents to corroborate the suspicion that C19 viral spread was due to a lab release. Also, the genetic signature proves the virus was tweaked in a lab. It is indisputable now. However, we don't have a media that will inform the public of the truth, and so there is little outrage and demand for correction. It also seems like the DOJ is not impartial, and the checks and balances are no longer operating as intended. Unfortunately, I think the public will learn the hard way, and many of the perpetrators will be gone by the time society is ready for a reckoning. We still have to push ahead and call out every discovered lie and deception. Perhaps Tucker is correct, and the mainstream media is teetering on its last legs, and a platform like 'X' will inform a wider audience of what is really going on.

Expand full comment

'X' (Twatter) remains part of the cover-up and suppression. Shove it down a borehole! You suggest anyone seriously follow Mockingbird big media (also including most of the "scientific", esp. medical, publishing business) for any reason besides ridicule? Those who do anyhow will never learn, and just continue shatting on us.

Burn FDR, Vannevar Bush, Charles Edward Merriam Jr., Louis Brownlow, Harry S. Truman, Harry S. Truman, and Paul V. McNutt in effigy.

Expand full comment

Here is the thing though lots are moving to X despite the negatives, because they at this point in time have a voice. That may change, but they are using it for what it is worth in the meantime. No point throwing the baby out with the bathwater. What other options do people have to get the facts out on a large scale without being censored, I don't know of any.

Expand full comment

Move, have a voice? How? Open a new Twat account every time they shut one down for asserting ivermectin can prevent river blindness? (They demand I retract that comment to consider reinstating my account.) That "advocates suicide", doncha know? Even 'X' is a lie since it redirects to twitter.com. Shove the lot of them down the borehole!

Expand full comment

But, it is not that black and white. Needed facts are being disseminated on that platform more than any other, not saying it is ideal, but echo chambers are not the answer.

Expand full comment

If you're not suggesting numerous new accounts, then what are "echo chambers"?

Expand full comment

The echo chambers are all the medical freedom fighters speaking out amongst other medical freedom fighters, and the message does not penetrate the mainstream.

Expand full comment

I was reading another substack (forget author) that claimed tyrannical actions rarely get admitted. Russia never apologized for killing many citizens by banishing them to Siberian prison camps or executing them for crimes against the state. I, too, feel outrage. I want desperately for authorities to acknowledge THEY WERE WRONG. It's possible that this will never happen.

Expand full comment
Dec 30, 2023·edited Dec 30, 2023

A stellar article. I contacted the ABC , in Australia, back in 2022, after they had published a headline that Prof. Holmes had debunked the Lab Origins theory. I pointed out some flaws in his logic and concluded that the headline was misleading. Several weeks later I received a reply from the ABC acknowledging my concerns and including a reference to a WHO article that supported the possibility of the Lab leak theory. They agreed to change the the headline to a more balanced caption. Ever since, I've had no respect for Eddie Holmes.

Expand full comment

Dr. Jack, it is YOU I followed through the beginnings of the vid, and the science you presented far outweighed the scientism peddled by our 'leaders'. I read the Nature article, and even THAT didn't persuade me. (of course) I knew it was a major cover-up. Thank you for the vigilance and your BS meter.

Expand full comment
Dec 30, 2023Liked by James Lyons-Weiler

Pathogenic priming made sense to this grandma on her iPad along with other articles not in circulation anymore. The big picture is frightening as we are still discussing old events as a major distraction to the loss of our rights through the international health regulations in preparation for the next planned events.

Expand full comment

While it published the early material about zinc and such RNA viruses as rhinovirus (the common cold), Nature has since fallen off the rails.

Expand full comment

Thank you for bringing renewed attention to the Wellcome Five article- it contains a wealth of info that remains to be explored. And thank you for all you do to promote truth and science- happy new year!

Expand full comment
Dec 30, 2023Liked by James Lyons-Weiler

Dr. Lyons-Weiler, please keep diving into the connections between scientists and the agencies that pay them. This is VERY important to reveal ...and helps people understand how deep the rot goes.

Expand full comment
Dec 30, 2023Liked by James Lyons-Weiler

PS and thank you for this dive....keep em coming. Ordinary people need to understand that scientism is not science.

Expand full comment

Thank you this info. Can you discuss or explain the federal regulatory process/pathway to be able to require EUA Countermeasures on the public without informed consent to refuse or not? Please look into 21USC 360bbb-3(k). These c19 vaxx is Not considered investigational and therefore does not require informed consent

Expand full comment

Any medical procedure requires informed consent, "investigational" or not. Targeting with military measures does not. "medical products" in that act is an outright lie. At least it disingenuously admits such products are "unapproved". Apparently shooting you with biological weapons is approved. "Mandates" (gratuitous, written requests for favors) partially side-step that, but most people don't know their own language.

Expand full comment

This section of 21 USC 360bbb-3 is confusing

(K) RELATION TO OTHER PROVISIONS

If a product is the subject of an

authorization under this section, the

use of such product within the scope

of the authorization shall not be

considered to constitute a clinical

investigation for purposes of section

355(i), 360b(i), or 360j(g) of this title or

any other provision of this chapter or

section 351 of the Public Health

Service Act [42 U.S.C.262].

(I) OPTION TO CARRY OUT AUTHORIZED

Expand full comment

From this declaration we learn what the criteria for issuing Covid-19 mRNA “vaccine” “emergency authorization” (EUA) are:

7. Prior to approval, beginning in December 2020,The same formulation of the vaccine,

known as Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine, was available under an emergency use

authorization ("EUA"). See https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-

key-action-fight-against-covid-19-issuing-emergency-use-authorization-first-covid-19. FDA has

Ediscretion to issue an EUA for an FDA-regulated product if: (1) the Secretary of the Department

of Health and Human Services has declared a public health emergency involving a biological or

other agent that can cause a serious or life-threatening disease or condition; (2) it is reasonable to

believe that the product may be effective in diagnosing, treating, or preventing that disease or

condition, and the known and potential benefits of the product outweigh the known and potential

risks of the product; and (3) there is no "adequate, approved, and available" alternative to the

product. 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(c). 2

2 Distribution of a product pursuant to an EUA is not a "clinical trial" subject to the requirements

for clinical trials conducted under an investigational new drug ("IND") application. 21 U.S.C.

§§ 360bbb-3(k); 355(1). Clinical trials must be conducted in accordance with an approved IND

and involve only enrolled study participants. Only clinical trial participants enrolled in a clinical

study conducted according to an approved IND receive the study drug.

Expand full comment
Dec 30, 2023Liked by James Lyons-Weiler

I am grateful for what you have done to advance science--without ties to pharmaceutical companies or WHO or WEF or other government agencies. This article-- so clearly contrasting your knowledge and devotion to scientific truth with corrupt bureaucrats and researchers-- did more for my mental health than years of psychotherapy. God bless your efforts and ipak-edu.org! We need to know that "the science" isn't necessarily disinterested, helpful, and worthy of unquestioned belief and obedience.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you so much. We are just warming up!

Expand full comment

Amazing article. Thank you

Expand full comment

Thanks James your material was one of the bright lights in a dark sea early 2020. Whitney Webb has covered farrar and Wellcome some time back. Very strong ties to Military and Intelligence

Expand full comment