Confusing Public Health Messaging Kills: Resources on Early Aggressive Treatment
Timing is essential in COVID-19 treatment. Universal knowledge of aggressive early treatment is required to counter reckless disinformational whiplash
Those of us most critical of Fauci and other public health voices hold a singular, crystal clear thought in our heads: confusing public health messaging kills.
A massive number of physicians around the country have circled around a handful of clear-cut, easy-to-follow protocols that science says reduces hospitalization. The entire gambit that early, aggressive treatment is in competition with vaccines was a red herring; the vaccine failure proves that public health messaging that buried and killed (for a while) COVID-19 therapies has been incredibly costly in terms of lives lost and the scale and scope of COVID-19 disease burden. Disinformation kills.
It’s up to Ethical Physicians to teach the early, aggressive treatments to their patients - BEFORE they get sick. Every physician who knows and uses the Math+ protocol should put out a video message to their patients telling them step by step the supplements and medicines they should take if they are exposed, or if they test positive.
Why “exposed or test positive”? Because by the time the public figures out they have COVID-19, it can be too late. Two or three days difference in terms of early, aggressive treatment can mean the difference between ambulatory care and hospitalization, and it can mean the difference between life and death.
As far as my detractors go who will dismiss this as another “anti-vaccine message”, go vaccinate yourselves all you want. The reality is that the public deserves to know the truth about early aggressive treatment regardless of vaccination preferences.
I have a message for physicians and public health personnel. PLEASE stop confusing the masses about early, aggressive treatment. It’s killing people. People are being hospitalized, given risky medicines, put on ventilators and dying needlessly because they go into phase 2 COVID-19 needlessly. MATH+, Dr. Brownstein’s maintenance protocol both keeps Vitamin D levels up well before they are needed - and by the time they are needed, it’s almost always going to be too late (see this database of COVID-19 VitD studies).
To my regular readings, please share this w/a physician or anyone else who is stuck on the vaccine vs. no vaccine distraction.
These two resources are super-important.
C19Early.com
IVMMETA.com
Also share the following please
https://covid19criticalcare.com/
https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(20)30673-2/fulltext
https://www.oatext.com/pdf/JTS-3-186.pdf
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2050312120925344
https://www.publichealthpolicyjournal.com/general-5
https://www.publichealthpolicyjournal.com/clinical-and-translational-research
Let's call what it is: most of the doctors don't make sense. Even before the pandemic, the medical system didn't work. It's time to change it for the better.
You are so right it hurts. Once again I'm waiting on a good (old) friend who is hanging on, at the edge of hospitalization. He got mAb ten days after exposure and nothing of substance since. The MDs dismiss nutraceuticals and claim IVM is dangerous so, even when you try and help, people are often afraid to go behind their doctor's back.