Combined Early Treatment of Dewormer, Combined with Antihistamine, Expectorant and SSRI Shows Major Clinical Efficacy Against Serious Illness From COVID19
Amazing, it only took 3 years.
I dedicate this article to Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. David Brownstein, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Paul Marek, Dr. Didier Raoult, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, who were among the true first visionaries who saw it as never-an-option to do anything but treat sick patients. I also dedicate it to the physicians who have stood firm against the ignorance-inducing effects of the enforcement of non-extant standards of care against the 21st Cures Act, which requires that physicians pay heed to real-world evidence on COVID19 outcomes.
Public health, allopathic medicine, the press, and politicians infamously railed against ivermectin as a “horse dewormer.” Fauci himself single-handedly killed a good study by Henry Ford Hospital on corticosteroids and hydroxychloroquine by claiming that because we did not know if it was the corticosteroids or the hydroxychloroquine, the study was “flawed.” That study had a 1/4 reduction in mortality in hospitalized patients.
Public health, allopathic medicine, the press, and politicians railed against ivermectin as a “horse dewormer.” This controversy overshadowed discussions around potential treatments for COVID-19 that did not fit the conventional pharmaceutical narrative. Similarly, a study by Henry Ford Hospital that reported a reduction in mortality from the use of corticosteroids and hydroxychloroquine was criticized by prominent figures like Dr. Anthony Fauci, who pointed out the study's design limitations in distinguishing which component was effective, leading to its dismissal as "flawed" - in spite of a 1/4 reduction in mortality.
Now, a study from Thailand has been published that has found that early treatment of dewormer combined with antihistamine, expectorant, and SSRI shows major clinical efficacy against serious illness from COVID-19.
The study investigates a combined early treatment regimen of a dewormer, an antihistamine, an expectorant, and an SSRI, demonstrating significant clinical efficacy in preventing serious illness from COVID-19. This approach challenges the earlier narratives and suggests a potential shift in the treatment paradigm for COVID-19, emphasizing the benefits of combination therapy that simultaneously targets multiple aspects of the disease.
Study Details and Findings
The Thai study conducted a controlled clinical trial assessing the impact of the combined treatment on patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 symptoms. Key findings include:
Zero deaths.
Prevention of Severe Disease: Patients treated with the combination therapy showed significantly lower rates of progression to severe disease compared to those receiving standard care.
Reduction in Hospitalization: There was a notable reduction in hospitalization rates among patients treated with the combination therapy.
Safety and Tolerability: The treatment was well-tolerated, with minimal adverse effects reported, suggesting its suitability for wide use.
These results provide evidence supporting the efficacy of this unconventional combination therapy and open the door for further research into repurposed medications as viable treatment options for COVID-19. It underscores the importance of rigorous scientific investigation to uncover potential treatments that may lie outside traditional frameworks.
This study from Thailand could represent a turning point in the ongoing fight to bring objective science to the fight against COVID-19. It challenges existing biases and expands the arsenal against the virus with affordable, widely available treatments. The success of this trial underscores the importance of diversity in therapeutic approaches, particularly in resource-limited settings, offering hope that more such combinations could be explored to improve patient outcomes globally.
The results of this study serve as a reminder of the potential of multidisciplinary treatment approaches in tackling complex diseases like COVID-19 and the need for more inclusive perspectives on drug efficacy and application.
Here you can listen to Dr. Mobeen Syed discuss the study.
There is no possible way that this combination of treatments could possibly be of benefit, as the profit margins are just too low. I mean, all these products can be purchased readily off the shelf.
"Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. David Brownstein, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Paul Marek, Dr. Didier Raoult, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko" - I would add a lot of others but in the early treatment section one really stands out. Dr Borody out of Australia. In August of 2020 he was using a IVM, Doxy, Zinc protocol and said:
"We know it's curable", "We can probably eradicate this" and "this is easier than treating the flu now".