Their definition of "Fully Vaccinated" means at least 21 days of case data and COVID-19 deaths are not being reported for Moderna & Pfizer and 14 days for J&J. Time to hit the BS Button.
The CDC knows the clot shots suppress natural immunity for a given time frame and seek to fix the data on their effectiveness. This is why double jabbed will be considered "unvaccinated" soon. Fear, propaganda, manipulation, control, power and the "vaccines" are the pandemic. The virus is the excuse.
Like every other Orwellian feat in this data-f*cking perception management campaign, the redefinition of terminology such as “unvaccinated” versus “vaccinated” has been used to obscure the inefficacy and potential lethality of the injections while feeding into their fear-mongering about the uninjected.
So yes, let’s demand they show us the raw data—and now … not 2096.
Likewise, every press release regarding hospitalizations, ICU numbers etc. should be scrutinized. I suspect a high percentage of "status unknown" is included in the unvaxed numbers wherever there is no separate category. Could be due to time constraints, no clear documentation standards, compliance issues, pressure from admin, just to name a few possible reasons.
And so far I haven't seen a single journo ask about this specifically.
It takes a couple of weeks for the vaccines to take affect. Fine. Those >14d people could be counted as fully vaccinated. However, the people in the <14d window should also be counted and *separately labeled*. If they are instead of being lumped in with the completely unvaccinated, that is disingenuous misdirection.
I've seen statistics from other countries, probably UKHSA, that does have a separate category for "partially vaccinated". If the CDC is lumping them in with totally unvaccinated, yet another reason to regard CDC statistics as unreliable.
Crossed paths with an ‘unvaccinated’ Jensen recipient. Caught the rona shortly after receiving the jab. Then roughly 3 days later had a pulmonary embolism.
Ever since massholes started harming their children with these jabs, rona is spreading like wildfire through the remaining uninfected vaccinated (most of the pure bloods I know have already recovered from Delta).
Hoping (praying) this will speed up the spread to herd immunity. But original antigenic sin scares the heck out of me.
In Germany people with only one dose (except JJ) or second dose <=14 days are counted as unvaccinated according to an answer based on a FOIA request I sent. So I would ask the CDC what is there definition. Months ago they (RKI) also calculated people with unknown vaccination status as unvaccinated.
The CDC knows the clot shots suppress natural immunity for a given time frame and seek to fix the data on their effectiveness. This is why double jabbed will be considered "unvaccinated" soon. Fear, propaganda, manipulation, control, power and the "vaccines" are the pandemic. The virus is the excuse.
Like every other Orwellian feat in this data-f*cking perception management campaign, the redefinition of terminology such as “unvaccinated” versus “vaccinated” has been used to obscure the inefficacy and potential lethality of the injections while feeding into their fear-mongering about the uninjected.
So yes, let’s demand they show us the raw data—and now … not 2096.
A "vaccine" so safe, you can't know about it until 2096.
😆 And *you*’re the conspiracy theorist for not trusting Pfizer and the government ;-)
You won't be around in 2096 anyway....
You're BS button says linked to a private page, even though I'm already subscribed 🤷🏻♀️
fixed!
It still doesn't work for me. No worries. It's fine
Righteous ! Loved the BS button, almost "smash a mole'd my phone," lol.
Likewise, every press release regarding hospitalizations, ICU numbers etc. should be scrutinized. I suspect a high percentage of "status unknown" is included in the unvaxed numbers wherever there is no separate category. Could be due to time constraints, no clear documentation standards, compliance issues, pressure from admin, just to name a few possible reasons.
And so far I haven't seen a single journo ask about this specifically.
It takes a couple of weeks for the vaccines to take affect. Fine. Those >14d people could be counted as fully vaccinated. However, the people in the <14d window should also be counted and *separately labeled*. If they are instead of being lumped in with the completely unvaccinated, that is disingenuous misdirection.
I've seen statistics from other countries, probably UKHSA, that does have a separate category for "partially vaccinated". If the CDC is lumping them in with totally unvaccinated, yet another reason to regard CDC statistics as unreliable.
Crossed paths with an ‘unvaccinated’ Jensen recipient. Caught the rona shortly after receiving the jab. Then roughly 3 days later had a pulmonary embolism.
Ever since massholes started harming their children with these jabs, rona is spreading like wildfire through the remaining uninfected vaccinated (most of the pure bloods I know have already recovered from Delta).
Hoping (praying) this will speed up the spread to herd immunity. But original antigenic sin scares the heck out of me.
In Germany people with only one dose (except JJ) or second dose <=14 days are counted as unvaccinated according to an answer based on a FOIA request I sent. So I would ask the CDC what is there definition. Months ago they (RKI) also calculated people with unknown vaccination status as unvaccinated.