Next you can implement SELF censorship of what we viewers see. Let US choose if it meets OUR personal guidelines and not some youtube/wef community guidelines. No censorship unless WE flags certain topics or sources or reporters. So if Associated press or Reuters had a channel I could select them to be censored. If Amazon was an advertiser I could select to not see THEIR adverts, if Fauci was being interviewed I could reduce my blood pressure by censoring him.
Later people can categorise adverts, products, people, advertisers, channels according to a number of metrics, do they support flat earth, then they get a conspiracy fraud flag, if they say ivermectin is only for horses they get a medical mafia flag.
After a while people could choose which flags they want to censor from their own stream. If you do a lot of flagging you get credit, if you pay money or watch adverts (that fulfil your censorship criteria) you get credits. If you have credit you can subscribe to flagging portfolios by smart people you trust or syndicates that select rational flags. In the USA you could probably subscribe to republican or democrat flagging syndicates if you want to only see one side of the story or select independent politics to get a more well rounded selection of flags. If you join a flagging syndicate that resonates with you then your flagging will be a crowdsourced input to the syndicate and will fine tune the flags that the syndicate selects. Some syndicates will be run by just one genus, others by the health freedom movement, others by conspiracy nuts or conspiracy debunkers, all are welcome. However each syndicate can be characterised by political leaning as determined with open industry standard metrics and also test for criminal back ground (pharma fines), promoting falsehood (safe and effective). This means I could look at flagging syndicates that are similar to my own choices and see if they have a unsavoury political slant that I do not want to entertain.
Once the flagging syndicates get better and branch out to other sources they will gain great power, better than a news paper, basically a tryst list of news sources that defeats the source of news and propaganda. These flagging syndicate profiles could be leased out to ANYONE for site income, someone could have a browser plug-in that checks every news page one visits against the lists and provides a live rating of the content and could place a read background behid any names on the naughty list to warn us while reading that out chosen worldview is not supported by Fauci or Schwab for instance. If a news report has a feed source of Reuters or Associated Press it could highlight the title to warn us that the whole article is primarily propaganda.
Imagine if all children (and us adults) has a way to choose based on factual metrics a worldview and then have junk flagged to warn them they are being played.
Fantastico. Let me be the first to congratulate Dr. Jack. Can't wait until it begins. I thank you, my sister thanks you and so does Josh.
Congrats… 🍀 🍾 Following on odysse 👍
Excellent cat interview 😆🐾🐾❤️❤️ perfect therapy 🐈⬛ 🐕
Is podcasting on your radar? It's one of the last bastions of free speech.
I love this idea.
Next you can implement SELF censorship of what we viewers see. Let US choose if it meets OUR personal guidelines and not some youtube/wef community guidelines. No censorship unless WE flags certain topics or sources or reporters. So if Associated press or Reuters had a channel I could select them to be censored. If Amazon was an advertiser I could select to not see THEIR adverts, if Fauci was being interviewed I could reduce my blood pressure by censoring him.
Later people can categorise adverts, products, people, advertisers, channels according to a number of metrics, do they support flat earth, then they get a conspiracy fraud flag, if they say ivermectin is only for horses they get a medical mafia flag.
After a while people could choose which flags they want to censor from their own stream. If you do a lot of flagging you get credit, if you pay money or watch adverts (that fulfil your censorship criteria) you get credits. If you have credit you can subscribe to flagging portfolios by smart people you trust or syndicates that select rational flags. In the USA you could probably subscribe to republican or democrat flagging syndicates if you want to only see one side of the story or select independent politics to get a more well rounded selection of flags. If you join a flagging syndicate that resonates with you then your flagging will be a crowdsourced input to the syndicate and will fine tune the flags that the syndicate selects. Some syndicates will be run by just one genus, others by the health freedom movement, others by conspiracy nuts or conspiracy debunkers, all are welcome. However each syndicate can be characterised by political leaning as determined with open industry standard metrics and also test for criminal back ground (pharma fines), promoting falsehood (safe and effective). This means I could look at flagging syndicates that are similar to my own choices and see if they have a unsavoury political slant that I do not want to entertain.
Once the flagging syndicates get better and branch out to other sources they will gain great power, better than a news paper, basically a tryst list of news sources that defeats the source of news and propaganda. These flagging syndicate profiles could be leased out to ANYONE for site income, someone could have a browser plug-in that checks every news page one visits against the lists and provides a live rating of the content and could place a read background behid any names on the naughty list to warn us while reading that out chosen worldview is not supported by Fauci or Schwab for instance. If a news report has a feed source of Reuters or Associated Press it could highlight the title to warn us that the whole article is primarily propaganda.
Imagine if all children (and us adults) has a way to choose based on factual metrics a worldview and then have junk flagged to warn them they are being played.
Dr. Jack, you are truly amazing!
This is so exciting, gentlemen. Congratulations and thank you!